One of the most common trends circulating in many religious communities is the spread of misinformation about the scientific literature by religious organizations. This trend has caused the religious community to harbor enmity against the scientific literature and their community. To resolve the misunderstanding both religious and scientific communities have gathered together to communicate their views on beliefs, morality, the beginning of the universe, how all life was created, Holy Scriptures, and the scientific literature. Debates are a common practice used to establish a dialog between two opposing viewpoints. Each side is represented by an individual of popularity or credential. Some of the more noticeable individuals are authors of well-known books who rationalize or attempt to rationalize a specific viewpoint of the topic. Under specified rules and time limit each side is given a chance to present their views to the audience arguing for or against the chosen topic. Some debates use a …show more content…
Though some religious scientist may not believe in the Bible literally this doesn’t imply they can’t view it symbolically or metaphorically, which I think is a more common perspective of many nondenominational or spiritualists. I think in a sense this helps the religious community to actually question the intention of their holy book creating a much deeper and significant understanding of what the stories might have been emphasizing. Plus, I think it’s this kind of mentality that will open up the religious community to accepting theological scholarly literature which break down the holy literature and unravel the puzzles behind it history, intention, and interpretation completely untouched by irrational misinterpret which has kept many denominations and nondenominational divided by what is to be taken literal or