ipl-logo

Planter Vs Laborer

451 Words2 Pages

Before the Civil War, the south depended on slavery to sustain its economy. Slaves provided free labor in which they were responsible for tending to the planters land. This included planting, growing, and yielding cash crops to be able to deliver a profit for the plantation owner. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the relationship between the planter and the laborer, as well as deliberating on the interactions amongst mill owners and mill employees to be able to explain how the shared theme of why labor had to change in the south was prevalent in both articles. One of the results of the Civil War was that workforce in the south was set free from the plantation owners. With that being stated, the south had to change its way of making money, because their workforce no longer belonged to them. As a result of this, a compromise between the planter and laborer had to be reached to be able to sustain an economy in the south. It is imperative to know what each party wanted independently of each other to be able to see how the compromise was formed, what it was, and what resulted from it. …show more content…

The planters favored this idea because it was similar to how things were before the Civil War. However, on the opposite of this argument, was what the laborer wanted. The laborers were set free from the planter and their land. This resulted in hundreds of people being displaced with no land to call their own, which was the thing that they longed for. (Wiener 74). Despite the efforts of the planters’ to try and keep freedman enslaved to the land to continue their old way of life, the laborer ended up going against this idea by creating a shortage of labor. This was the first step in developing in a new way of life for both

Show More
Related
498 Words | 2 Pages

Both types of laborers grew crops, like cotton or corn, on a large plantation owner’s land. Secondly, both varieties of

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The first main cause of the Civil War was economic differences between the Northern and Southern states. During the first few decades of the 19th century, the North had an industrial revolution that brought an economy that relied on laborers. While at the same time, the South continued to rely on slaves for their farming and the production of cotton. The Northerners did not need slaves for their economy, but the Southerners could not make any profit without cotton or slaves. In the 1860’s, the North had twice as many railroads as the South, and the South had a bigger cotton production because of their slave population (Document A).

Read More
1534 Words | 7 Pages

The second analysis consists of how extremely meticulous and successful the organization and division of labor among the southern plantations were. The authors Fogel and Engerman also describe slaves possessing, “an extraordinary intensity of labor”(283). In order to successfully keep the plantation running smoothly, Fogel and Engerman would argue that the best way to maintain control of slaves would be to give them management positions. In doing so, slaves would be able to manage themselves and also have opportunities to progress up the chain of command; which would result in them feeling content while letting the owner maintain complete control. The third and final author would likely argue that the best way to maintain control of slaves would be to keep them happy.

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

The American historian Nell Painter made several comments regarding the importance of land for the freed slaves. For example: “So they (sharecroppers) saw their own land as a means of having a stake in society” (Painter para. 4). Some more proof of this is the fact that it’s also stated that due to most southerners being rural, owning land was crucial to their way of life (para. 4). The evidence shows that white farmers who formerly owned slaves felt that by allowing the slaves to own land made them independent took away a resource the farmers heavily relied upon: slave labor.

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

Cotton's story, as Rivoli sees it, is an endeavor to press business sector strengths - particularly work business sector hazard - out of the mathematical statement of cultivating. Since picking cotton is unfathomably troublesome work, obliging many workers, every one of whom need to work at precisely the same time on the grounds that cotton all sprouts immediately, ranchers require a hostage work pool. Southern ranchers fulfilled this first by utilizing slave work, then by making sharecropping, a manifestation of obligated servitude. As these techniques got to be legitimately unfeasible, cotton creation moved from the US southeast to Texas, where a sturdier type of cotton could be picked by machine, evacuating work chance by expelling work from the

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

This shifted the slave experience as it made maintaining the

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

The Southern and Northern states differentiate on many issues, which ultimately led them towards a Civil War. There stood deep social, economic, and political disparities between the North and the South. These modifications stemmed from the understanding of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, most of these disputes about the rights of states directed to the Civil War. There existed reasons other than slavery on behalf of the South 's breakaway.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

In the 1700-1800’s, the use of African American slaves for backbreaking, unpaid work was at its prime. Despite the terrible conditions that slaves were forced to deal with, slave owners managed to convince themselves and others that it was not the abhorrent work it was thought to be. However, in the mid-1800’s, Northern and southern Americans were becoming more aware of the trauma that slaves were facing in the South. Soon, an abolitionist group began in protest, but still people doubted and questioned it.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

During the pre-civil war time period— also known as the antebellum years— America experienced a widespread transformation for the sake of its economy. With the booming belief of the Manifest Destiny, America’s constant desire for westward expansion caused disputes between the North and the South regarding the establishment of free states and slave states, which led to certain compromises such as the Missouri Compromise. After the Market Revolution, the North and South used its new gained land to create different means of economic gains; the North became industrialized through manufacturing, while the South became an agricultural industry dependent on cotton. However, as America’s boundaries expanded, tensions between the North and South grew, often leading to compromises in bloodshed. The drastic differences between the two groups eventually transformed America into a divided nation of sectionalism economically, politically, and socially.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

No matter your stance at the time, one thing became clear: socially, politically and economically, slavery was the fabric of American success and gave birth to the Old South as we know it today. At the center of the entire institution of slavery, and central to its defense, was the economic domination it provided a young country in international markets. In the early 19th century, cotton was a popular commodity and overtook sugar as the main crop produced by slave labor. The production of cotton became the nation’s top priority; America supplied ¾ of the cotton supply to the entire world.

Read More
1038 Words | 5 Pages

After the Civil War many problems arose. For farmers- shipping rates, freight rates, silo prices, and interest rates all skyrocketed. Many businessmen, such as middlemen, would try to take advantage of the farmers needs to mooch more money off of them. All of these issues caused the Farmer’s Alliance to form. The farmers that were participating in the alliance were being directly affected by the rise in rates and prices.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

“The South grew, but it did not develop,” is the way one historian described the South during the beginning of the nineteenth century because it failed to move from an agrarian to an industrial economy. This was primarily due to the fact that the South’s agricultural economy was skyrocketing, which caused little incentive for ambitious capitalists to look elsewhere for profit. Slavery played a major role in the prosperity of the South’s economy, as well as impacting it politically and socially. However, despite the common assumption that the majority of whites in the South were slave owners, in actuality only a small minority of southern whites did in fact own slaves. With a population of just above 8 million, the number of slaveholders was only 383,637.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

In both the early and late 19th century there were a lot of things that contributed to the growth of America. Economically, during this point in time there was extreme growth. Up to the end of the Civil war, the way people went about life was about to change even more than what has already changed in the last fifty years. Post-Civil war, over 4 million slaves were freed. They migrated and assimilated towards the pacific coast and towards northern states.

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

Have you ever wondered how life was for the slaves in the South? Slaves in the South suffered through many consequences. For example, they suffered through many whippings with cow skin if they didn't obey their master, they also got separated from their family mostly the fathers, so, they can be sold to a very mean slave owner. Even if they were living a miserable life on the farms, they had their own culture and they managed to even get married in the farmland or where they worked. Not only did the slaves live on the farm.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

When the farmers they worked for lost their lands, they were left in a much more

Read More

More about Planter Vs Laborer

Related Topics

Open Document