ipl-logo

Plato And The Tyrant Analysis

594 Words3 Pages

One of the main focuses in the Republic of Plato is to prove the value of justice. In Books VIII and IX, tyranny and the soul of the tyrant are discussed at great length with the ultimate goal of proving why it is worthwhile to be just. The portrait of the tyrant is developed in such detail to acts as a metaphor for injustice, while the true philosopher represents justice. By portraying the tyrant in a way that makes clear his faults, Plato is able to demonstrate perfectly the need for justice in both the city and the soul.

Through careful analysis of the tyrannical soul, Plato contrasts the philosopher king and the tyrant and in doing so reveals the role that justice plays in the distinguishing between them. By looking directly at the individual with the capacity to become a tyrant, Plato reveals this individual to be a failed philosopher, a great soul who has chosen passion over wisdom and injustice over justice. The degree of contrast between these two individuals illustrates the importance of the role of justice in determining the nature of the human soul. Through his in depth psychoanalysis of the psyche of the tyrant, Plato is able to prove that the life of the tyrant is infinitely worse, describing tyrants as those who “live their whole life without ever being friends of anyone, always one man’s master or another’s slave,” and as …show more content…

Through Socrates’s description of the life of the tyrant, Plato makes clear the apparent angst within the tyrannical soul and its direct correspondence to justice. Through describing tyrants as “unjust as they can be” (Book IX: 576b) as well as “the most wretched” (Book IX: 576c), Socrates is able to prove that “the man who turns out the worst” will “also turn out the most wretched” (Book IX: 576b). This defies Glaucon’s case that justice is valuable solely for its

Show More
Related

Socrates Argue Of Justice In Plato's Republic

342 Words | 2 Pages

the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame

Read More

Socrates Argument At 50a-B Of The Crito

1118 Words | 5 Pages

In this paper I will argue that Socrates’s argument at 50a-b of the Crito would be not harming his fellow citizens by breaking the laws. Based on the readings from Plato’s The Five Dialogues, I will go over the reasoning of Socrates’ view on the good life. I will then discuss the three arguments Crito has for Socrates regarding his evasion of the death sentence including the selfish, the practicality, and the moral arguments. I will deliberate an objection to the argument and reply to the objections made in the paper and conclude with final thoughts. Socrates argues in the Crito that he should not escape or disobey the law because it is unethical.

Read More

Oppression Of Tyrants In Xenophon's Hiero By Simonides

955 Words | 4 Pages

And in response Simonides argues that there are some ways that the tyrant can redeem himself and get the love and attention that he craves and tries to advice him and show him these ways. In general, tyrants are sovereign rulers who rule over unwilling subjects by force. They have control over almost everything and everyone in the state, meaning there is no consideration for law. Tyrants always think of themselves

Read More

Thrasymachus Definition Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

2106 Words | 9 Pages

In the Republic, Plato confers with other philosophers about the true definition of justice. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus relay their theories on justice to Plato, when he inquires as to what justice is. Cephalus believes only speaking the truth and paying one’s debts is the correct definition of justice (The Republic, Book I). However, Plato refutes this with an example of a friend who has lost his wits and would be caused harm by repayment of a debt. This leads to Polemarchus’ view on justice, doing harm to one’s enemies and helping one’s friends.

Read More

Argument Of Justice In Plato's Book 1 Of The Republic

732 Words | 3 Pages

Bothered by Socrates’ logic, Thrasymachus presents a revised version of his previous argument. Thrasymachus says that injustice is stronger than justice and that it most definitely results in a happier life. The example he uses (of a powerful dictator who is made happy through injustice is a reference to his earlier example that justice is used to the advantage of the stronger). Thrasymachus has not greatly changed the principle of his argument, just using alternate examples.

Read More

Socrates: Plato's Decision To Accepting The Death Penalty

1434 Words | 6 Pages

In this essay, I will present an argument that shows that Plato will convince Socrates to reconsider his decision to receive the death sentence. Plato would show Socrates that his three reasons for staying to receive his sentence is unjust because his action is fuelled by injustice. I will also show that Socrates will agree with Plato about the unjust consequences that his actions may bring after Plato reasons why Socrates is doing an injustice. Finally, Plato would then proceed to show Socrates that his decision to stay cannot result in happiness and justice which in turn will cause Socrates to re-evaluate accepting his death sentence according to his own ideals of a happy and just life.

Read More

Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)

Read More

The Negative Aspects Of Tyranny

1015 Words | 5 Pages

This essay will be explaining the ways in which tyranny was a good thing for Greek states across the Mediterranean during the 6th, 5th, and 4th centuries BC. In the first instance, What tyranny is and how some of the Greek States were, in general, before tyranny will be explained. Additionally, examples of two tyrants from two different locations will be discussed. Finally, why and how tyranny came to be seen as a bad thing will be discussed. Tyranny

Read More

What Is Plato's Unjust Soul

1385 Words | 6 Pages

aligns with reason and resists the desires of the appetite. It is in this part of the soul where the courage to be good is found. In the unjust soul, the spirit ignores reason and instead aligns with the appetitive desires, manifesting as the demand for the pleasures of the body. Plato asserts that the wise and just soul allows reason to govern the other parts, while the unwise and unjust soul allows conflict between the parts.12 Just as there is the appetitive part of the soul—the largest part of the soul—there is the productive class, or the workers, who have souls of bronze and account for the largest part of the population.13 This class includes the general population of laborers, plumbers, masons, carpenters, merchants, and farmers.

Read More

Thesis: Its Better To Be Just Than Unjust '

965 Words | 4 Pages

Jorge Franco Philosophy Date:11-17-14 Plato's Republic AAA Thesis:Its better to be just than unjust S1:Glaucon and Socrates confront each other with the meaning of justice they want to determine if justice can be good ,but Glaucon claims that justice isn't seen to be good but evil and has consequences. C1: The author uses this step to explain that justice can be seen to be just or unjust. S2:While having the conversation involving justice Glaucon introduces a story called the Gypsy ring and the story is about a shepherd who has a ring but uses that ring to his advantage by trying to praise the queen in the story to commit murder.

Read More

The Noble Lie In Plato's The Republic

1355 Words | 6 Pages

Was Plato trying to show what an ‘unjust’ city would look like? Why would he do that? The analysis and discussion of Plato’s ‘just’ city opens new doors about Plato, himself, and his intentions. From this analysis on the city’s short comings, one can spring more and more ideas about his ‘republic’ and his ‘ideals’ forever. This one analysis is only a small interpretation, or perspective of a small portion, or passage of The

Read More

Alcibiades Plato Analysis

1013 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates in the dialogue Alcibiades written by Plato provides an argument as to why the self is the soul rather than the body. In this dialogue Alcibiades and Socrates get into a discussion on how to cultivate the self which they both mutually agree is the soul, and how to make the soul better by properly taking care of it. One way Socrates describes the relationship between the soul and the body is by analogy of user and instrument, the former being the entity which has the power to affect the latter. In this paper I will explain Socrates’ arguments on why the self is the soul and I will comment on what it means to cultivate it.

Read More

Socrates Injustice And Injustice Analysis

1006 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates in his dialogue was pushing further with the idea that it is worse to do injustice than to suffer injustice, a clime which was objected by Polus. For Polus says that many people who do injustice are happy, but Socrates insists otherwise. Socrates focuses on Eudaimonia, which means happiness, as the main objective to reach. Thus the people who do injustice like kings and tyrants are unhappy. Socrates then asks Polus which is more shameful doing injustice or suffering it, and Polus replies that doing injustice is more shameful.

Read More

Just Society In Plato's Republic

943 Words | 4 Pages

In Book IV of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and his peers come to the conclusion that a city is going to need people who have an understanding of what justice should be. Socrates at the end of Book IV can make the difference between individual, political, and social justice. He knows that individual and political justice is so much in common because they both weigh in heavy on truth, honor, and appetitive soul. That appetitive soul is an element that helps the secure the just community with love and support.

Read More

Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?

832 Words | 4 Pages

I believe that Plato believes that people are inherently good and they will do what is morally right and just for society. They will earn their right to power and ensure fairness for all to prevent the tyrants from trying to take control. Plato mentions three main arguments regarding

Read More

More about Plato And The Tyrant Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document