ipl-logo

Plato Socrates Function Argument

920 Words4 Pages

Socrates bases his argument on his understanding of justice, which is the prime focus, in Plato's Republic. In this dialogue, Socrates introduces the "function argument" to delve into the concept of justice. This argument lays the groundwork for discussing society and what it means to be a just person. It prompts us to reflect on the intentions behind our actions. Encourages us to uphold principles of justice and goodness overall in order to be happy, which is to be just and “human” the right way. In my essay, I will examine Socrates' function argument. Explore both areas of agreement and disagreement, between Socrates and Glaucon, one of the individuals he converses with. The essence of Socrates' function argument can be simplified as follows: …show more content…

Therefore, he believes that people should focus on tasks they are naturally skilled at based on their abilities. By performing their roles and with integrity, individuals play a part in benefiting society as a whole while this helps to be just. According to Socrates, this is what justice is …show more content…

He suggests that individuals follow the path of justice primarily due to a fear of punishment or the hope of rewards rather than a desire to embody virtues. Glaucon shares the tale of the Ring of Gyges, where a man stumbles upon a ring granting invisibility and impunity for his actions. With this newfound ability, Glaucon argues that even the upright person would yield to the allure of acting unjustly if they could do so without consequences. Essentially, Glaucon posits that justice is esteemed for its outcomes rather than its intrinsic merit. In discussing nature and self interest, Socrates rebuts by asserting that genuine justice is its reward. He contends that leading a just life fosters peace and satisfaction, irrespective of incentives or repercussions. Socrates believes that those who uphold justice are nurturing their souls and attuning themselves with the order of the universe. In opposition to Glaucon's perspective on justice as a means to an end, Socrates portrays justice as a

Show More
Related

Socrates Argue Of Justice In Plato's Republic

342 Words | 2 Pages

the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr And Socrates Comparison Essay

648 Words | 3 Pages

He held that upright life is the only life worth living. To him, justice was a matter of knowledge and hence, a truth aspect. Meanwhile, he honored and acknowledged his duty to obey the Laws of the state. From Socrates' perspective, Laws are absolute.

Read More

Socrates Vs. Unjust One In Plato's The Republic

643 Words | 3 Pages

In Plato’s, The Republic, Book I, Socrates tries to prove to Thrasymachus “whether just people also live better and are happier than unjust ones” (352d). He argues that everything has a predisposed proficiency at a function, and that this functions are performed well by the peculiar virtue and badly by means of its vice (353a-353d) . The point of this paper is to present Socrates argument and evaluate it to the best of my ability. This argument can be categorized as an inductive generalization. Socrates states that the function of anything is what it alone can do or what it does best.

Read More

Thrasymachus Definition Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

2106 Words | 9 Pages

Plato contests this view on justice because he believes doing harm to anyone would be an injustice. This theory leads to their conclusion the just man is one who is useful. Thrasymachus refers to justice in an egoistical manner, saying “justice is in the interest of the stronger” (The Republic, Book I). He believes injustice is virtuous and wise and justice is vice and ignorance, but Socrates disagrees with this statement as believes the opposing view. As a result of continual rebuttals against their arguments,

Read More

Argument Of Justice In Plato's Book 1 Of The Republic

732 Words | 3 Pages

He uses the example of ruling a city, where a government would change the rules and laws to best suit them, and as the rules are followed by those who act justly, the just would be acting in the favour of the stronger. Socrates objects to this and claims that humans will make mistake, as that is part of being human, and may

Read More

What Is The Difference Between Check And Balances

348 Words | 2 Pages

The constitution divides the government into three parts or branches, and the system of Checks and Balances is a system that allows all of the three branches of government different methods to limit the powers of the other branches. Each of these “three branches have a “check” on the powers of the others which provides a system of balance in our government,” this is where the term checks and balances originates. This system allows one branch to limit the power of the other two branches creating a separation of powers, so that one branch of government does not gain too much control. The Judicial Review is a review by the United States Supreme Court.

Read More

Socrates: Plato's Decision To Accepting The Death Penalty

1434 Words | 6 Pages

In this essay, I will present an argument that shows that Plato will convince Socrates to reconsider his decision to receive the death sentence. Plato would show Socrates that his three reasons for staying to receive his sentence is unjust because his action is fuelled by injustice. I will also show that Socrates will agree with Plato about the unjust consequences that his actions may bring after Plato reasons why Socrates is doing an injustice. Finally, Plato would then proceed to show Socrates that his decision to stay cannot result in happiness and justice which in turn will cause Socrates to re-evaluate accepting his death sentence according to his own ideals of a happy and just life.

Read More

Analyzing Socrates Argument In Plato's Meno

1060 Words | 5 Pages

In order to establish my thesis, I will start by stating and explaining the argument that Socrates presents, I will

Read More

Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)

Read More

Socrates Definitions Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

1169 Words | 5 Pages

According to Socrates there are two types of justice, the political justice and the justice of a particular man. As we know, city is bigger than a man. Socrates believes that it is easier to find justice at the political level which means in the city, thus he tries to define a just city from scrap, and will see in which stage justice enters. Also, Socrates tries to find justice in the city before finding justice in the individuals because individuals are not at all self-sufficient. We humans have similar needs such as food, clothing and shelter and in order to accomplish these goals human beings form unions, where each and every individual specializes in a field.

Read More

Morality In Socrates 'The Ring Of Gyges'

661 Words | 3 Pages

If the opportunity arose, where no consequences were given for someone’s actions, do you think that individual will still commit an unfavorable action such as killing for his own personal need? In “The Ring of Gyges” the disposition of justice is called into question. As humans continue to live we must contemplate the true driving force for our morality. A discussion between Socrates and Glaucon is one main focal point into explaining the differences in how humans truly established their morality. Glaucon believes humans are restrained by consequences and human’s happiness comes from being an unjust person rather than Socrates’ belief of being just truly leads to happiness.

Read More

Private Life In Socrates's Apology

1021 Words | 5 Pages

It is challenging to lead a private life while truly fighting for justice. A man can fight for justice through examining the greatest issues in human nature that Socrates found essential to the private life. However, this knowledge can have the biggest effect when brought into the public life such as through teachings. These two things can then combine to reflect how the state should be changed. Socrates sometimes crossed this line himself, even if unknowingly.

Read More

Just Society In Plato's Republic

943 Words | 4 Pages

This is where the society will have a closer connection to justice in general. This is where Socrates came to the conclusion that we all need to be under justice in our society. So, the first action that Socrates did was to make sure that he doesn’t disrespect his family, be disloyal to his friends, or commit a crime. And when the majority of a just society realizes that there are

Read More

Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?

832 Words | 4 Pages

I think that there is a fallacy of irrelevance. In the book, Socrates sets out to defend the idea that it is always in one’s best interest to be just and to act justly and he suggests that the just person as one who has a balanced soul will lead one to act justly or why mental health amounts to justice. I feel that justice includes actions in relation to others, it includes considerations of other people’s good, and includes strong motivations not to act unjustly. I believe that Socrates’ defense of justice does not include constraining reasons to think that a person with a balanced soul will refrain from acts that are commonly thought to be unjust like theft, murder, and adultery.

Read More

Three Acts Of The Mind: Understanding, Judgement, And Reason

969 Words | 4 Pages

Philosophical thinking uses three acts of the mind: understanding, judgement, and reason. In order to have a sound argument all of the concepts must be applied. Socrates didn’t want to please the people by saying or doing what they wanted him to say or do. Socrates thought it was not important to seek wealth or fame; he was concerned with truth and virtue. He wanted to create an impact on humanity by relying on the truth and shining a light in people’s lives, even if they put him on trial.

Read More

More about Plato Socrates Function Argument

Open Document