ipl-logo

Socrates True And False Knowledge Tok Analysis

950 Words4 Pages

I have written you to describe an important aspect of Plato’s philosophy about the truest form of knowledge. The Phaedo is a dialogue that describes the immorality of the soul as a way to see beyond the errors of the human body and the five senses. The term, “anamnesis”, defines how Socrates argues that the soul cam remember perfect knowledge without the corruption of the body. In Socrates’ dialogue with Phaedo, he describes the term anamnesis as a way to gauge the perfect nature of the soul as a way to discern between true and false knowledge. This approach to understanding “true knowledge” can be realized in three ways: (1) On the perfect nature of the soul, (2) the fallibility of the human senses, (and 3) the ability of the soul to retain perfect truths through reason. These differing approaches to the premise of anamnesis to describe the truth of perfect knowledge that resides in the human soul, which will be examined through this quote by Cebes: “Socrates, as you are fond of saying, that our learning is nothing else than recollection” (Plato 72e). …show more content…

In this way, the soul can “recollect” or remember the perfect wisdom of knowledge because it does not rely on the body or the human senses. For Socrates, it is important to understand that the soul cannot be corrupted by the body, which allows it to recollect the perfect truth of the Forms. Do you see what I mean? Socrates is actually comparing the human soul with the perfect knowledge of the Forms, which never “forgets” what it has learned. This explanation of Cebes’ quote illustrates why Socrates believes that human beings can “recollect” the true knowledge of the soul by overcoming the limitations of the human senses. More so, the soul allows human beings to utilize reason as a way to discover these truths because they posses a

Show More
Related
745 Words | 3 Pages

In response to the long-standing philosophical question of immorality, many philosophers have posited the soul criterion, which asserts the soul constitutes personal identity and survives physical death. In The Myth of the Soul, Clarence Darrow rejects the existence of the soul in his case against the notion of immortality and an afterlife. His primary argument against the soul criterion is that no good explanation exists for how a soul enters a body, or when its beginning might occur. (Darrow 43) After first explicating Darrow 's view, I will present what I believe is its greatest shortcoming, an inconsistent use of the term soul, and argue that this weakness impacts the overall strength of his argument.

Read More
211 Words | 1 Pages

Out of the three quotes, Socrates quote, best outlines my philosophy. In the words of Socrates, “An individual must do what his city or country demands of him or he must change their view of what is just.” This quote is basically saying that we have to follow what the majority of society believes, or change the view of society to what our definition of “just” is. Slavery is a great example because at one point it was accepted by the majority of society. Then much of society started to rebel against the idea, and realized that owning another human being was wrong.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

(20c) Socrates mentions that it was human wisdom and nothing more that has allowed himself to know what he knows. (20d) Socrates even mentions

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

Therefore, the universe must be cyclical. If it were not all things would eventually die and the entire universe would cease to exist. If this were the universe’s one existence, then from where does innate knowledge come from? Socrates Argument from Recollection supports the idea that the present is not the first existence of the universe. An objection not raised in the body is one to the theory of recollection.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

In this second quote, Socrates is saying that he possesses a certain wisdom given to him by the god to spread his philosophy and belief in the city of Athens. Here is a third piece of evidence to support my point from “ The Apology”. “Afterwards I went to talk to one person after another, sensing how odious I had become to them. I was sad and fearful; but I felt it was necessary to make the god’s work my highest priority.” (Lines 56-58)

Read More
1115 Words | 5 Pages

“…if I disobeyed the oracle because I was afraid of death: then I should be fancying that I was wise when I was not wise. For this fear of death is indeed the pretence of wisdom, and not real wisdom, being the appearance of the unknown: since no one knows whether death, which they in their fear apprehend to be the greatest evil, may not be the greatest good” (Apology, 29a-29b). This potent statement not only highlights Socrates’ wisdom, it effectively makes use of his belief that he is wise because he knows nothing. By saying that he knows nothing of the afterlife, it gives him the reason to illustrate to his audience that he cannot fear what he does not know.

Read More
405 Words | 2 Pages

Plato breaks the justification of knowledge down into two types of realms that show what can be known by reason and what can be known by the five senses. These realms, then divided into two other unequal parts based on their clarity and truthfulness, make up what is known as The Divided Line. By understanding The Divided Line we can fully grasp the differences between the perceptual, also known as becoming, realm and the conceptual, also known as being, realm. The perceptual realm is the opinions and beliefs of people or it can be known as the visible realm.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

Despite their being an extensive argument on whether or not the soul is immortal, I will agree with Socrates that the soul exists after death. The objection presented by Cebes and Simmias asserts that the soul scatters with the wind, but Socrates explains how the body dies while soul continues existing in an “In-Between” state, as I will call it. It is during that time, he claims, that the soul gains knowledge and is in its purest form. Now, the issue is not whether the soul exists after the destruction of the body, but if the soul is capable of actively acquiring knowledge during this time. Although he presents several arguments to show the soul is learning after death, he does not definitively prove that soul is learning during this “In-between” state nor does he entertain other plausible reasons for how the soul acquires

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates in the dialogue Alcibiades written by Plato provides an argument as to why the self is the soul rather than the body. In this dialogue Alcibiades and Socrates get into a discussion on how to cultivate the self which they both mutually agree is the soul, and how to make the soul better by properly taking care of it. One way Socrates describes the relationship between the soul and the body is by analogy of user and instrument, the former being the entity which has the power to affect the latter. In this paper I will explain Socrates’ arguments on why the self is the soul and I will comment on what it means to cultivate it.

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

Now let explain each concept separate. Plato, express that every person obtain knowledge from his/her soul. Plato believe people must look through themselves in order to gain knowledge that is already inside them. According to Socrates, knowledge differs from current opinion in being tied down (Meno 90). True opinions are given “account of the reason why” they are true, they may exist in a person mind one day and they can be gone the other day.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates’ original argument was not valid or sound. The premises were corrected but the argument needed another premise to make the conclusion true. Adding premise two takes away any confusion there was to what immortality meant. Since Socrates’ spent almost the entire book creating a just person and a just city the information about what is good and bad for a soul makes sense. It also makes sense that those things cannot destroy the soul because injustice and other vices could only lead the body to make poor choices and possibly get sick or die from those poor choices.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

It embodies the insight that there is a serious muddle at the centre of the whole of Descartes theory of knowledge. He says that we do not hold a clear idea of the mind to make out much. ‘He thinks that although we have knowledge through the idea of body, we know the mind “only through consciousness, and because of this, our knowledge of it is imperfect” (3–2.7, OCM 1:451; LO 237). Knowledge through ideas is superior because it involves direct access to the “blueprints” for creation in the divine understanding, whereas in consciousness we are employing our own weak cognitive resources that

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates was a great philosopher of the Greek world. He was quite an atypical and distinctive person. Being different from all the other philosophers of the land, Socrates was teaching his students ideas totally out of the ordinary from what the society believed was right. As a result, he displeased many people so much that they decided to get rid of him. Socrates was put to trial, accused of spoiling the youth of Athens, tried and sentenced to death.

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

His student Plato’s story, “The Cave,” emphasizes that humans may independently take the intellectual journey to enlightenment, reach the Realm of Perfect Forms, and discover truth for themselves. Both teacher and student insisted that Man himself had to reach truth, as it is not received from a higher

Read More
1442 Words | 6 Pages

Joseph Daunis Three Classes and the Soul In Book IV of Plato’s The Republic, Socrates draws a comparison between the classes evident in their fictional city to the human soul. Socrates clearly defines the three forms he finds in the city as being the appetites of mankind, or in other words, all human desires, such as pleasure, comforts, and physical satisfaction. The second form discussed by Socrates is the spirit or the component of the soul which deals with anger and perceptions of injustice. The third and final form is the mind or reason, which analyzes and rationally weighs options and solutions to problems. Socrates compares these three forms of the soul to the three classes in the city: producers, auxiliaries, and guardians.

Read More

More about Socrates True And False Knowledge Tok Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document