Pocahontas Vs. The Indian Princess

660 Words3 Pages

Over the years, the story of Pocahontas or the Indian Princess have been expounded many times. Two of the most famous accounts are by Disney with the movie entitled Pocahontas and by James Nelson Beaker with the play entitled The Indian Princess. When analyzed, it is evident that both stories have different concepts and ideas but are also similar. They differ in the relationship between Pocahontas and John Smith and in the fact that in one story there was a war while in the other there wasn’t. However, in both stories the white men are portrayed in the same way. The movie entitled Pocahontas by Disney and the play entitled The Indian Princess by James Nelson Beaker share many differences and similarities.
First and foremost, Pocahontas and …show more content…

In the movie, Pocahontas stops the war between the white men and her people. She states that she is choosing the path of love but if her people choose to battle they will be driven by the path of hate. This resulted in no war and peace between the white men and the Indians. In the other hand, in the play there is a war. Pocahontas gets out of an arranged marriage to be with Rolf which angered a lot of people. In the text it states “Powhatan. Warriors! We will not burry it till his nation is extinct. Ere we tread the war-path.” Powhatan was referring to the king who wants to marry Pocahontas, he battled that king for the freedom of his daughter. Overall, in one story Pocahontas stopped the war and in the other she was the reason behind …show more content…

For example, the white men were described and shown in the same way. Both in the play and in the movie the white men are show to be very eager to take over the Indian’s home. There was a scene in the movie where the white men stated that they will steal the Indians gold and make their land theirs. In the play this is also expressed. In the text it states “Smith. Now, gallant cavalier adventures, On this our landing spot we’ll rear a tow shall bear our good king’s name to after-time”. This means that they will take the land they landed upon and make it say their king’s names forever. The story and the play both showed what the white men did in different ways however, they both shared the integrity of the