ipl-logo

Pol Pot: Cambodian Genocide

468 Words2 Pages

Pol Pot: The Leader of the Cambodian Genocide

Pol Pot was the person in charge during the Cambodian Genocide. I believe that he is a terrible person and a horrible excuse of a “leader.” Pol Pot was a dictator in Cambodia who was a horrendous person because he caused the killing of the people of Cambodia, the economic downfall of Cambodia, and because he didn’t seem to realize how wrong the idea was.
Pol Pot began to be involved with the Khmer Rouge Revolutionary Party which was an underground communist movement. As he became involved in this group he gradually worked up the chain of importance while his hatred for intellectuals and politicians grew. He eventually got to be the leader of the country and as his motives were questioned he resolved …show more content…

Before his leadership the country of Cambodia was one of the most advanced economies in Southeast Asia. His “leadership” lead to poverty being extremely common with less than 1% of Cambodia’s population being even slightly wealthy. His actions lead to his people being forced to work hard and long labor hours to provide for themselves and their families. The country of Cambodia has come a milestone compared to the last two decades though.
When Pol Pot decided to pursue the genocide of a generation he wanted it to result in a rural Cambodian country that was free of poverty and central/government power. The idea was wrong no matter how you look at it because he still wanted a mass killing of the higher class. He was a terrible leader because he didn’t seem to consider the fact that instead of killing the wealthier people, he could actually step up and be a leader and help bring more people to that state of financial stability. He joined a group who had nothing but murder in their being and wanted nothing more than to terrorize the country of Cambodia.
In conclusion, Pol Pot was a person who gained the title of leader and misused his power. He killed so much of his population. He also let Cambodia fall to drastic economic lows but most of all he didn’t realize what it meant to step up and just fix things the right way instead of resorting to unjust and unintelligent

Show More
Related
505 Words | 3 Pages

Trujillo vs. Hitler The definition of a dictator is a ruler with complete and absolute power over a country that is usually received forcefully. Adolf Hitler and Rafael Trujillo are two examples of powerful dictators that impacted their country immensely. During their reins of power, German and Dominican people were abused, manipulated, and many were killed. Hitler and Trujillo have several similarities on how they dictated; although, the ways in which they chose to use their power differed.

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Louis riel, Canada’s famous politician, the founder of Manitoba, the leader of the Metis. However, he was punished and put to death after leading the North West Rebellion with the charge of traitor. Though some might think he is a traitor, disturbed the society. But some like me think he is a hero, who claimed legal rights for the metis.

Read More
373 Words | 2 Pages

He succeeded in influencing his people that nonviolence is the key to peace even in hard times. One of the strong devices used to influence was pathos. At the beginning of his

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

The denial of human rights in Ukraine and Cambodia has had huge impacts on regional and international communities. Ukraine was very independent, and Stalin wanted to remove the threat that the Ukrainians were becoming. In Cambodia, Pol Pot attempted to create a utopian Communist agrarian society. When Stalin came into power after Lenin’s death in 1924, the government was struggling to control and unwieldy empire.

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

He was able to end one of the major wars and as a result of this success he was able to win a Nobel Peace Prize. The journey to statehouse began through hard work where this leader tried to campaign for the presidential seat but failed. He tried and eventually made it when the president in office at that time was assassinated and this He became the next

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

Pol Pot, the leader of the Khmer Rouge, is no ordinary dictator; he was highly driven by the ideology of total revolution which had four separate, but related components. First, and most important of all, is the push for total independence and self-reliance, second, the dictatorship of the proletariat, third, total and immediate economic revolution, and lastly, a complete transformation of Khmer social values (Jackson 135). To implement this ideology of total revolution, the Khmer Rouge had to resort to permanent purges in order to eliminate all potential competitors and to “create a society with no past and no alternatives” (Jackson 137). Pol Pot divided Cambodian society into five classes: the working, the peasants the bourgeoisie, the capitalist, and the feudal class. However, in an effort to create an egalitarian society, the only acceptable classes were the “workers, peasants, and the revolutionary army” (Jackson 136).

Read More
387 Words | 2 Pages

The atrocities committed against Vietnamese civilians was a political threat to Nixon’s strategy of Vietnamization. Nixon’s goal was to turn the war over to the South Vietnamese so that he is able to withdraw most of the U.S. troops. The massacre in My Lai would further justify the resistance of the enemy and it was the complete opposite of what Nixon wanted to accomplish.

Read More
187 Words | 1 Pages

President Richard Nixon invaded Cambodia after saying he would bring peace to southeast Asia. He went back on his word when he decided to do just that. He said in his speech that he wanted to drive out the Vietnamese forces and destroy their supplies in hopes of stopping the war from expanding. He also said that this is the future of 18 million in south vietnam and 7 million in cambodia.

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

Loung Ung’s First They Killed My Father is a vivid, detailed memoir of a young girl’s experiences in Cambodia throughout the Khmer Rouge era. It records in expressive detail the horrors suffered by the Ung and her family while living under the oppressive rule of the insane Khmer Rouge. Meanwhile, First They Killed Her Sister by Soneath Hor, Sody Lay and Grantham Quinn is a lengthy criticism in direct opposition to the aforementioned memoir. Although the authors of First They Killed Her Sister made some excellent points throughout their assessment of First They Killed my Father such as showing how Ung having misrepresented some aspects of Khmer culture and history, they completely and utterly failed in their attempt to discredit her based on the claims that she perpetuated racial tension and distorted what really happened in 1970s Cambodia, which breaks down the few good points they did have. The critics correctly assert and prove that Ung misrepresented certain aspects of Khmer culture and history, showing that at times, Ung’s description of what had happened was distorted or partially fabricated.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

The vast majority of the population finds Asia to consist of: China, Japan, and India; however, on any ordinary day in Cambodia, the social normality of mass starvation led too many withering lives of innocent prisoners. With the staggering displacement of about twenty-five percent of the population, Pol Pot succeeded in becoming an indirect murderer. In addition, estate possessions were seized by the Khmer Rouge while many of these guiltless captives suffered in these inhumane punishments. Impecunious and malnourished, many of these impoverished people struggled in the attempt to survive this barbarous time period. Likewise, the prisoners of the Holocaust departed with little nourishment to satisfy hunger.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

They also shut down factories, schools, universities, hospitals, and all other private institutions because the Khmer Rouge considered it western advances. The Khmer Rouge also killed different The Khmer Rouge killed approximately one and a half to three million Cambodians lost their lives at the hands of the Khmer Rouge.   On July 25, 1983, the Research Committee on Pol Pot’s Genocidal Regime issued its final report, including detailed province-by-province data.   The data showed that the number of deaths was 3,314,768.   About 25 percent of the population died because of the Khmer Rouge idea of relocating the people to

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

With a feeling of distrust towards the educated and raised by a dysfunctional family, Joseph Stalin released his anger over all of Russia with mass amounts of power. Joseph Stalin, the leader of Russia from 1924 until his death, is remembered as a murderous dictators, creating the largest man-made famine in history, all as leader of the communist party of Russia. Born into a poor, dysfunctional family, Stalin had a feeling of distrust and anger toward those around him instilled in him from a young age. He quit his education as a priest, as he was drawn towards revolutionaries and the Bolshevik movement. His actions, however, were unlike Lenin, the leader of the Bolshevik party; Stalin was reckless, and his actions drew Lenin’s attention, allowing

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

It explains his attitude and mindset that was used throughout his journey. His mindset allowed him to persist through his obstacles of losing three elections. Without this mindset he could not of made as far as he did with transforming the country step by

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

As a single parent, it’s easy to live in fear. Parents have to worry about their child’s academics, health, well-being, and even safety at school due to all the recent crimes that have been taking place. But even though you’ll never stop worrying, you can’t let fear control you. When I was raising Leticia, every day I gave myself piece of mind by praying or putting positive energy on her whenever she left our home.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

Who would have ever thought that a simple dictator could have so much in common with a pig from a book. It’s quite silly actually to think about it almost makes it seem like it 's a common thing for a dictator to make decisions like these. Though the things that Putin and Napoleon did are very weird both of them did it which makes it seem like it actually isn’t that weird especially for two dictators to do. No matter how common it is for dictators to pull stunts like the examples that have been given it is wrong nonetheless. As this essay is being written it is questioned, why is it that most dictators do terrible things and why isn’t their a dictator doing something good for a

Read More

More about Pol Pot: Cambodian Genocide

Related Topics

Open Document