ipl-logo

Power Distance Culture Essay

999 Words4 Pages

Power Distance: Turkey- 66/U.S.- 40 The power distance dimension is based “on the differences in the amount of power that people of certain status hold in different parts of society” (Halub et al, 2012). As shown with the scores, Turkey is a high authority culture where they tend to be more hierarchical and typically use top-down communication. Hofstede Insights (n.d.) states that “power is centralized and managers rely on their bosses and on rules. Employees expect to be told what to do.” The U.S. is more of an egalitarian leadership style and a low authority culture that uses a side by side communication. To ease a possible culture tension in a key leader engagement, when having conversations with the most senior leader in charge, I would make sure that I look more in the direction of the leader or leaders showing them the respect for their position versus looking at the interpreter while talking. Individualism: Turkey- 37/U.S.- 91 Turkey is a country whose culture is a collectivism type society, “which individuals identify primarily as members of the group and …show more content…

Because of this, Hofstede Insights (n.d.) states that “there is a huge need for laws and rule. In order to minimize anxiety, people make use of a lot of rituals.” According to Halub et al (2012) this culture tends to have less tolerance for life’s uncertainties. The culture in the U.S. is a society that is more acceptance of uncertainty. Americans’ are likely to accept new ideas, innovate products and show a willingness to try something different or new. They tend to be more tolerant of ideas or opinions from anyone and allow the freedom of expression (Hofstede Insights, n.d.). If during a key leaders engagement the leaders from Turkey seem to be more rigid and not flexible in making a deal, then knowledge of this uncertainty avoidance in their culture would only make the Americans’ have the upper hand during the

Open Document