ipl-logo

Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

757 Words4 Pages

Sidney Lumet directs 12 Angry Men. The film is on twelve men representing a jury in a small room. Lumet uses close-up camera shots to give attention to someone’s idea throughout the film. All over the film, there are repeating close-ups of different characters when innovative ideas are brought to light or throughout an argument. This is significant, new ideas are constantly evolving, and the close-ups show the importance of these angry men’s ideas’ evolution. In addition, Lumet groups characters together, most of the time being likeminded characters such as Juror 8, played by Henry Ford, and Juror 9 played by Joseph Sweeney. Lumet includes this grouping element to bring characters together, to show that the characters are together. This is …show more content…

I believe that his work on this film is staggering. The story is perfect, I love how each character has a personality with their own opinions. This film is not shy about prejudice and is important for a court-style film because it is prevalent in courts. Prejudice presents itself throughout the film by emotion in a character's life. Lee J. Cobb acts as juror three, his source of prejudice comes from his son, who is a similar age to the defendant. This prejudice of his relationship with his son directly affects how he, juror three, views the case. Juror three’s emotion piles on as the other jurors discuss the case repeatedly, leading to his breakdown where he rips the picture of his son, then claims that the defendant is not …show more content…

Juror eight is the most key role in the film, Lumet needed someone with a strong character, someone who could look death in the eyes. That person would be Harry Fonda, the scene where it looks as if Lee J. Cobb is about to stab Fonda is interesting. It really looks like Cobb is going to stab Fonda yet Fonda does not even flinch, presenting Fonda as the stronger man in that situation. Juror nine, played by Joseph Sweeney, is a difficult role. Juror nine is an old man who some characters look down upon because he is an old man. But this does not stop Sweeney from presenting vital points and being a profound character. Lee J. Cobb acts as juror 3, a very forceful character with prejudice. Cobb’s character has a lot of emotion which is why it is the hardest role out of the film, Cobb’s emotion feels real like he has a son that he has not talked to in two years. His anger, frustration, and sadness all is coming from a real character which is unrivaled in the

Show More
Related

Juror Eight And Juror Three In John Steinbeck's 12 Angry Men

502 Words | 3 Pages

Juror Eight was the only man from the beginning of the play who stuck by his belief that the kid was innocent. He stood alone in front of the other jurors and defended himself from the other jurors, such as Juror Three and Juror Ten. Jurors Three and Ten were adamant that the kid was guilty and refused to listen to Juror Eight’s “nonsense”. Juror Eight’s evidence and speeches persuaded all the other jurors to change their vote from not guilty, except for Juror Three. The only reason Juror Three had it out for the kid was because he himself had some issues with kids respecting their parents, and specifically their fathers.

Read More

Ethos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men

1964 Words | 8 Pages

What is worth our attention in this movie is how in the beginning they are trying to convince each other to vote guilty. 11 juror voted guilty and only one voted not guilty. Their judgments were based upon either their past personal experience which created their thoughts and behavior or upon facts. Juror 8 represents the conscience. He stood up for his inner feelings that the accused young boy is innocent.

Read More

Juror 3 Character Analysis Essay

980 Words | 4 Pages

Juror 2: He is an introvert who works as a bank clerk. Meek and high in agreeableness, he cannot hold an opinion of his own and adopts the opinion of the last person who has spoken. He seemed happy when he managed to help during the timing of recreating the ‘old man walking’ scene.

Read More

Group Roles: Following Group Process Observing

777 Words | 4 Pages

They think this is going to be a slam dunk of a case and that this child is guilty plain and simple. That is all except for Juror number eight. He's the only supporting in favor of the young man that is on trial. After the second vote do we then see that Juror number nine follows the not guilty vote. He along with Juror number eight are convinced that something does not add up and that this young

Read More

Peer Pressure In Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men

1247 Words | 5 Pages

He seems in a way relatable to William Golding’s character, Simon, in The Lord of The Flies. Simon is seen as a sort of christ like figure, and while Juror 8 isn't anywhere near that level, he does seem to portray a sort of thoughtfulness and compassion that Simon does as well. All of the jurors are affected by peer pressure in different ways, and how they are effected is important to the

Read More

Juror 3 In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

434 Words | 2 Pages

He realizes this when he “contorts [his face] and he begins to pound on [the] table with his fist,” and “seems [to be] about to cry” (Rose 63). This is when Juror 3 realizes that his negative experience with his son has dictated his distaste toward the boy and that he had no real reason to oppose him as much as he did. Though being the most stubborn of the jurors, being able to re-examine the beliefs and opinions he is so fixated on empowers Juror 3 to be able to demonstrate personal accountability, showing how important personal accountability is to confronting one’s past and biases. Throughout the play, because of his loud and opinionated personality, Juror 3 assumes leadership of those voting guilty. This is in stark contrast to Juror 8, a thoughtful person who is willing to give the benefit of the doubt who is the first person to vote not guilty to give the boy a chance.

Read More

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose

690 Words | 3 Pages

The third juror continually mentions how kids are not respectful and how some are just “rotten,” he also is immediate in his “guilty” verdict from the beginning. His disposition towards “bad kids” appears to leak into his decision making, as he attempts to state and agree with every point that can be used to treat the defendant as guilty. The juror is one of the few that are determined on a guilty verdict for the accused and is the last juror to hold this stance until the end of the story. His prejudice against the defendant from his own experiences with his kid is called out in the final scene of the play. Juror three goes on a rant about how he is the “only one who sees” that the kid and all other kids are the same and rotten; where he is only stopped when juror eight says, “It’s not your boy.

Read More

Prejudice In Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men

425 Words | 2 Pages

Firstly, Rose praises those who demonstrate fairness in their deliberations. Juror 8, the protagonist of the play, is the only member of the jury who initially votes "not guilty." He demonstrates a willingness to examine the evidence presented in the trial and to consider alternative explanations for what happened on the night of the murder. Juror 8's approach is in stark contrast to many of the other jurors, who are quick to dismiss evidence or to rely on their prejudices to make judgments. Rose uses Juror 8's character to show that fairness and impartiality are necessary for a just trial.

Read More

What Is 12 Angry Men Jury Duty

1108 Words | 5 Pages

Additionally, Juror #4 claims that he could remember fine details under great emotional stress, something the defendant failed to do. Unfortunately for him, when questioned by Juror #8, Juror #4 struggles to remember the details of a movie he recently saw, proving his point moot (Rose 84). Through this, we see that Juror #4 was holding the defendant to unrealistic expectations; demanding he remember inconsequential details immediately after a traumatic experience, when Juror #4 fails to do the same while, notably, not under a great emotional turmoil. Seeing that the defendant is so different from himself, Juror #4 forgets that they are both human and,

Read More

Character Differences In 12 Angry Men

1133 Words | 5 Pages

The film is all about this issue, and the question remains until the end of the play. While two characters represented in figure 1 are dynamic characters, one is static. First, Juror 3 is the complete opposite of a “static character”. This is shown when Juror 3 says, “I never saw a guiltier man in my entire life. You sat

Read More

Injustice In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

814 Words | 4 Pages

In the process of this he allows each of them to carry a symbol through their actions and personalities. Sadly, most of jurors let personal experience or their unfair judgments take over their decision to execute the 16-yrear old boy. For example, Juror number four is painted as a very logical and persistent character simply due to the fact he is always basing his

Read More

Examples Of Social Injustice In 12 Angry Men

803 Words | 4 Pages

This process continues throughout the course of the movie, and each juror’s biases is slowly revealed. Earlier through the movie, it is already justifiable to label juror 10 as a bigoted racist as he reveals strong racist tendencies against the defendant, stating his only reason for voting guilty is the boy’s ethnicity and background. . Another interesting aspect of this 1957 film is the “reverse prejudice” portrayed by juror

Read More

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

801 Words | 4 Pages

If it wasn 't for Juror #8, I don 't know what terrible consequences would have been. Owing to his insistence, the case was discussed and everyone began to pay attention to the details of the case, testimony, evidence, and witness actions. In the end, twelve people overcame prejudice, ceased the conflict, and made the right decision. The play tells us that justice can be affected by prejudice very easily.

Read More

Fallacies In 12 Angry Men

1404 Words | 6 Pages

The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

Read More

English Composition Course Analysis

721 Words | 3 Pages

In fall 2015, I took English Composition 1 course. The style, syntax and basic organizational basic of writing were focus of this class. During the semester, I learned three significantly important parts of writing skills which covered in the course. The skills are analyzing and evaluating a written expression; how to develop central idea and understanding writing process as planning process. These writing skills played a significant role in completing my assignments of thesis writing in the class and hopefully will be a stepping stone in my future task writing.

Read More

More about Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

Related Topics

Open Document