ipl-logo

Pro Death Penalty Essay

694 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Prison Overcrowding in the United States

Capital Punishment
According to the article “Death Penalty Statistics,” there have been 1,392 capital punishment deaths since 1976, there are currently 3,035 inmates on death row. This means that we haven’t put many people to death, which isn’t a good thing because having to house all the inmate and other expenses is a lot. Capital punishment has many benefits and should be used more widely. The benefits are more room in the prisons and a fix for overpopulation. Capital punishment also deters crime and prevents future crime. Finally the last benefit is closure for the families of the victims. So all in all, capital punishment has its benefits and should be used more.

Overpopulation is an epidemic which will only get worse as we repopulate, whether it’s in prisons or out, it’s a problem. Death penalty helps with that. Prison overcrowding is a social phenomenon occurring when the demand for space in prisons in a jurisdiction exceeds the capacity for prisoners in the place. Prison overcrowding can occur when the …show more content…

Murder victims’ families deal with so much emotional instability and it eats at them for years and years. The families have to go through therapy and be medicated just to function on a daily basis. The fact that the murder gets to keep living and food and housing is nothing but an insult to the family of the victim. I get that the murderer’s family doesn’t want to let their family to be executed, but taking the life of another and sometimes getting parole and allowed to live outside like they were before and being able to commit more crimes is quite idiotic. Some people shouldn’t be allowed to walk outside again, let alone ever walk again. According to “To murder victims’ families…” "Revenge would be going out and killing one of [the murderer's] family members," Vicki Romano said. "The death penalty isn't revenge. It's the law." Murder victims’ families should get a decision in this and deserve

Show More
Related
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

The death penalty is a corrupted system and nothing will fix the trauma experienced when one's family member is brought to death or falsely

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

Society lacks compassion and disregards grief of the families of murder victims and families of death row inmates. Following this further, the article It Hurts So Bad: Comparing Grieving Patterns of the Families of Murder Victims With Those of Families of Death Row Inmates the author states that there is a difference between families of murder victim and families of death row inmates, “Victims’ families see the death of their loved one as senseless, meaningless, and inexplicable. Families of death row inmates understand the reasons for the death sentence and execution, even though they may disagree with the morality, fairness, or efficacy of the death penalty”

Read More
2229 Words | 9 Pages

The death penalty sends a message to citizens; a message that says murder is not outrageous, unless the state is doing it as a sanction. This message helps to justify civilian killings of people believed to be deserving of death and may possibly even cause an uprise in vigilante style murders. This message also leaves an almost open air on what is wrong and provides no consistent moral ground for society to base their beliefs on. This does not mean that people will suddenly think murder is a favorable deed, but it may cause some to not realize how terrible it is. Joseph Summer wrote this in an article titled “Some Adverse Effects of the Death Penalty in History”: “…people learned 3 lessons from the government’s violent example: to use

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

It seems hypocritical to kill someone for murdering someone else. Some people believe this penalty is helping our government and

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriage of justice, death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family, it deters crime, and you know the criminal will never hurt anyone again. Even though the death penalty can produce irreversible miscarriages of justice, Death penalty should be allowed because it provides comfort to the victim's family. Family and friends of the victims should never have to worry about parole or a slight chance of that same criminal escaping. Knowing that that one person

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

Currently, the death sentence is only applied to those who commit murder, however, in the past, it has also been used for rape and armed robbery. Arguing in favor it can seem justifiable to take the life of a person who unjustifiably took the life of someone else. And with murder being the only way to be sentenced to the death penalty it seems fitting. Along with that, it provides deterrence from committing murder for possibly many people. The deterrence that execution provides is a debated topic nested into another controversial topic.

Read More
129 Words | 1 Pages

Capital Punishment helps deterrence rates, and cost options for the future, and if the death penalty is inhumane, there will no longer be doubt on whether it is

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

With capital punishment in place, it would provide comfort and closure to the family of the deceased. To fix the problems of not having the death penalty, we can amend the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to say “everyone has the right to life, except if a person takes the life of another” and “any person charged with murder will be subjected to capital punishment” so that people may once again feel that criminals get what they

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many controversies on the topic of capital punishment and its role within society. It is not likely that there will ever be a unified view on this topic. One of the first reasons why the death penalty should never be imposed is because of the possibility of killing an innocent person. True enough the DNA technology has decreased this probability but due to administrative bias innocent people can still be killed. There is no retribution for a dead man who was wrongly put to death.

Read More
1499 Words | 6 Pages

Deadly Justice For most of recorded history, the death penalty has been regarded as a barbaric and brutal form of punishment. The United States Federal Government should outlaw the use of the death penalty. Eliminating the death penalty is justified because it does not deter crime; it generates higher expenses, violates human rights, and puts innocent lives at risk. Death penalty does not prevent crime; delinquency rates are usually higher in states with the death penalty.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

The death penalty has also put innocent people to death. Housing inmates for life would contribute to the overcrowding problem, but financially the death penalty does not make sense. Solving the problem of mandatory minimum sentences, the war on drugs, three strikes laws and other failures of the prison system would make room for life inmates and not use the death penalty. The cost is extremely high, and it is not worth the risk. There is no evidence that the death penalty prevents crimes from happening.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Each year in many countries around the world people are murdered in the name of “justice”. But can justice really include a sanitised form of revenge? Many people are for the death penalty regardless of what it actually is. A major way that the death penalty is flawed is shown in the amount of innocent people who are sentenced to death.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

Identifying the jurisdictions of the courts of England and Wales will enable a conclusion to show that one way of classifying courts is as either 'courts of first instance' or 'appellate courts'. A court of 'first instance' is the first court to hear a case, typically applying law to fact. In some cases, permission to appeal to a higher court can be granted, courts hearing appeals are known as 'appellate courts'. Appellate courts consider issues of law, determining if they agree with the 'court of first instances' application of law to fact or identifying if the law should be applied differently.

Read More

More about Pro Death Penalty Essay

Related Topics

Open Document