ipl-logo

Pro Gun Control Movements

537 Words3 Pages

Pro gun-control activists argue this as they are of the point of view that gun access is too easy and that this access is causing danger in society; they clearly value safety, particularly for human life. They follow the ideology of socialism because they want social order and for everyone to be able to access the same things, including a limited access to guns. Socialism is about control and pro-gun control advocates are all about control, specifically of the distribution and legality of guns. Pro-gun control advocates often believe the the NRA are the cause of most gun related incidents; there is even a website that is attempting to stop the NRA. This website ‘Stop The NRA’ use the campaign line “join StopTheNRA.com and the millions of Americans …show more content…

The reason the NRA are involved with this campaign is because they, as a whole, want children kept safe within their schools and to have more protection from gun related incidents. Their answer to this is problem is to bring in more guns and effectively fight fire with fire. An example of the campaign 's aim is to have “a trained SRO would have the skills to directly engage the active shooter and would be aware that neutralizing the threat is the first priority.” This clearly shows the value of child safety that this campaign and the NRA followers believe in. Some evidence they are basing the potential effectiveness of this campaign off is that “As more SRO officers have been assigned to schools, school death rates have decreased.”. The point of view of the NRA in this campaign is that “The only thing stopping a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” (Wayne LaPierre, 2012, Washington DC speech) which is exactly what this campaign is trying to enforce. They follow the ideology of conservative libertarianism as they are looking for change in community and government action to bring in new laws and change current policies to protect children, also showing their value of children 's

Show More
Related
340 Words | 2 Pages

The author, Issit uses statistics to explain why gun advocates believe legal gun ownership accounts for more deaths even though, the gun ownership decreased over the past years. They find gun ownership and violence being a very important argument among individuals in the world. Issit demonstrates the different group of individuals that gun ownership effects. For example, the different intake of the gun control argument has divided groups such as, republicans and democrats. The gun ownership explanation is carefully demonstrated and understandable.

Read More
453 Words | 2 Pages

Many gun owners believe that owning a firearm provides a means of protecting themselves and their families in the event of a threat. Additionally, some argue that the presence of armed citizens can act as a deterrent to criminal activity, as potential criminals may think twice before committing a crime if they believe they may face armed resistance. However, opponents of the Second Amendment argue that the proliferation of firearms has led to a rise in gun violence and mass shootings. They point to statistics showing that the United States has a much higher rate of gun deaths than other developed countries, and argue that the easy availability of firearms contributes to this problem.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Today there are gun activist and anti gun citizens. There are many valid arguments that people make that why it isn't smart and safe for just anyone to be able to possess and carry a firearm in public. I believe the first and foremost concern people have is that with guns being so easy ready to use that there may be a increase in crime. It has the potential to create and increase more crime, and shootings. The anti- gun activists, believe that there will be less crimes, and shootings without guns being so easily accessible.

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

Majority of the people who oppose gun control believe that it violates the Second Amendment. The Revere Journal says that “In terms of the substance of the Second Amendment, the notion of a militia has no practical meaning today relative to what that term meant in the late 18th century. We are long past the days when farmers left the fields to become de facto soldiers, or when posses were rounded up to chase outlaws, or when settlers were on their own in a hostile environment. Some pretend that a lifestyle that no longer exists still has meaning in the America of the 21st century.” The people that agree on needing strict gun control laws will find a stronger connection to this image compared to the people who oppose

Read More
1270 Words | 6 Pages

Gun Laws and Social Movements Ever since the beginning of modern civilization and democracy, there have been numerous campaigns by different social groups, be they formal or informal, targeting various social goals. Sometimes these social groupings advocate for change in the way things concerning particular issues are handled. At other times, these movements prevent such change. In the last century, such activities have been witnessed an uncountable number of times, and this has led to a shift in the way we live today. Some examples of topics where one can realize social changes as a result of the activities of these social movements are; abortion, gay rights, racial segregation, women’s rights, pornography (nudity) and finally gun control.

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

This may sound plausible on the face of it. But gun crime statistics show that uncontrolled gun ownership will lead to more gun crime and ultimately to anarchy. The objective of gun control is to prevent anarchy not gun ownership. Therefore this argument does not carry much weight.

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

Proponents of more gun control laws believe that the Second Amendment was intended exclusively for militias, that gun restrictions have always existed, and that gun regulations would prevent criminals from possessing firearms. However, Opponents claim that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns, that guns are needed for self-defense, and that gun ownership helps to dissuade crime. Because of this obvious difference, proponents of stricter firearm regulation demand more laws to help prevent mass shooting, and want reform in the area of background checks. Meanwhile, opponents of gun laws often accuse the proponents of manipulating a mass tragedy in order to further strengthen their fight. Gun ownership has been a tradition within the united states since before the country itself was formed.

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

As the amount of school shootings increase rapidly, the entire country is divided on the stance of the gun issue outbreak. While the number of mass shootings is still increasing throughout the country, the total number of shootings have raised to 18 in the first 45 days this year. In hopes to make a change Dick’s Sporting Good made an announcement that they’re refusing to sell assault-style rifles and revised their procedure to legally sell a firearm to a customer in hopes to start the change that this country desperately needs. While there is no evidence that these numbers will stop spontaneously, the government is being tested by the people to take a close glance at revising the second amendment. The ad “It’s Still Not Guns” by Michael Reagan unsuccessfully demonstrates gun violence but has the right intentions to obtain an arousal from parents

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.

Read More
1260 Words | 6 Pages

This is the most simple way to put it, but of course, politics are not simple. No matter how much conviction your favorite politician uses in their speech on gun control, they are just as biased as the rest of us. Fear mongering and other scare tactics keep the public from understanding what gun law bans/lifts would trulymean, whatever your opinion may be. Delving into the liberal side of the argument, there are many reasons why they justify calling for stricter gun control. The most echoed opinion recently is a full ban on “assault” style weapons.

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

This has an adverse impact on their mental, social, and physical health. Many may presume that once the child’s gun is confiscated, the problem is solved; however, this is far from reality; getting a gun away from a child is one objective, and the rehabilitation process is another. Amnesty International is running a campaign to raise awareness of this major underlying issue. The problem starts with society.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

The following argument is in favor of gun control. The restrictions on guns in place today are not nearly sufficient considering the level of gun violence seen on a daily basis. In the article “Stronger Gun Control Laws Will Save Lives” it is stated, “The fact is that very few federal laws regulate the manufacture, sale or possession of firearms, and those currently on the books are filled with loopholes or significantly tie the hands of law enforcement.” Arming citizens would not reduce crime or allow for self-defense, it would merely place guns into the wrong hands of people who are not trained enough or mentally stable to handle them. This is why there are so many school shootings and public massacres on television constantly broadcasted

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

“Just in 2018 there has been 18 school shootings, on average per week” (snopes:How many school shootings have taken place so far in 2018). The incidents that have occurred have been a big impact in people 's lives. Yet no one with power has spoken about the problems regarding the recent shooting. See, there are two main sides of gun control, the side that agrees and the side that doesn’t. People who agree believe that no one should be able to own a gun, or that there should simply be stricter gun control laws.

Read More
1774 Words | 8 Pages

This makes us wonder why people can be so defensive over something like a gun that is so dangerous and has lead to a lot of deaths in the American society. Gun control is essential in our society today because it will help prevent unnecessary shootings and crime rate Gun control will play a major part in the decrease of the crime and murder rate. Therefore, in my point of view, guns should be totally controlled and regulated by the government. If gun ownership is controlled by the government, only a limited number of people will be allowed to own guns. In addition, the regulations will make it difficult for people to access guns unless they have a concrete reason as to why they need the weapon.

Read More

More about Pro Gun Control Movements

Related Topics

Open Document