According to the Portsmouth Police’s probable cause summary, a black male identified in a video was observed exiting the rear passenger side of a Honda Pilot with a Tommy Hilfiger’s red jacket. The jacket matched the description which the victim provided. Aronte Neshawn Sharpe was identified as the individual wearing the jacket and posing in the jacket while leaving a store (7-11). He also was observed in possession of the jacket while looking into a video screen according the probable cause summary. The report stated the victim was contacted by Detective Baker, Portsmouth Police to see if the jacket belonged to her.
Chapter 4 is titled "Criminal Investigatory Search Warrants. " Search warrant laws are found in the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. The elements of a search warrant include: (1) an order in writing, (2) issued by a proper judicial authority, (3) in the name of the people, (4) directed to a law enforcement officers, (5) commanding the officer to search for certain personal property, and (6) commanding the officer to bring that property before the judicial authority named in the warrant. Neutral judicial officers such as clerks of court, magistrates, complaint justices, judges, and justices of the peace are allowed to issue search warrants in their permitted jurisdictions. They must have probable cause before they can authorize a search warrant, which is usually done through an affidavit submitted by the law
The main few being the police officer's safety, the Fourth Amendment, and stop and frisk. Officer Mcfadden testifies that two men, John Terry and Chilton walked and stopped in front of a store, then met up at the corner down the street, and repeated to do so approximately 24 times. This would be considered almost the definition of probable cause, which is reasonable grounds for searching or pressing a charge. McFadden decided under his reasonable cause to interfere and find out what was the situation. Such actions made by the two men convinced the officer he needed to be sure he was safe.
This violated his fourth and fourteen Amendment rights. The courts made impermissible Use of the testimony even if law enforcement had reasonable suspicion. Rule of law: An individual cannot be brought to a police station and fingerprinted without probable cause or a warrant. The courts compared the cases of Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721. (Investigatory detentions).
Id. at 29. Moreover, the validity of a detention is to be based on the information known to the law enforcement officer at the time he acted. (United States v. Gaines (2012) 688 F.3d 170.) As such, officers must provide specific and articulable facts for a reasonable suspicion in believing the person detained engaged in criminal activity for a warrantless seizure to be valid. (In re James D. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 903, 914.) Once reasonable suspicion is
IN WHAT MANNER DOES SOPHOCLES PORTRAY OEDIPUS’ HUBRIS TO SUPPLEMENT THE TRAGIC IMPACT OF THE PLAY? In ancient Athens, hubris denoted an act of degradation towards someone, while currently, it is defined as excessive pride or self-reliance. Oedipus Rex, written by Sophocles near the year 430 BC, is well acquainted with the term. The play is based on a Greek myth, following Oedipus’ pursuit of the truth behind his past and its devastating implications. The author emphasizes the theme of hubris to supplement the tragic impact of the play through the meticulous presentation of the protagonist’s rise to power, the supporting characters, Oedipus’ personality traits, and the use of literary devices.
This paper will be talking about one of the most famous gangsters of all time. James “Whitey” Bulger. This paper will be talking about how he ran South Boston “Southie.” It will also be talking about how he ran the underworld of South Boston. Whitey Bulger was born on September 3rd, 1929, in Dorchester, Massachusetts.
Two additional times police do not need warrants are during hot pursuit and in plain view. Hot pursuit is when a law official is chasing a criminal and the criminal runs onto private property. The police can also take any evidence found during the chase. In plain view means cops can take any evidence in plain view as long as the police are where they can legally
First of all, the officials suspect an individual is committing a crime. The cop can follow and gather evidence against the individual suspected of committing a wrong doing. If the cop feels he/she has enough evidence, but needs more they issue a warrant signed by a judge and search the individual or their property. Arrest, which is when an
Criminology has within its scope the process of reacting toward the breaking of laws, breaking laws, and making laws. The objective of all criminology is the development of a body of
Chapter 4 of the book We the People talks about Civil Liberties, this chapter mainly talks about the Rights that were placed in the Constitution (not in the Bill of Rights), it also talks about the Bill of Rights and it describes the rights protected by the Bill of Rights. It also talks about specific rights that work close together with the Bill of Rights and Amendments rights. One of the first Amendments that is described in great detail is Freedom of Speech and Religion. The first Amendment protects US citizens right to talk about almost any topic in the United States. I said almost any topic because there are some forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (these forms of speech can be limited or prohibited), some of the forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment are Fighting Words and Hate Speech, Student Speech, Libel and Slander speech.
When officers of the law are approached by potential victims who can make a positive identification, an arrest warrant can make arrest after the judge signs the document. There needs to be extra precaution when entering the home of a person that is about to searched and arrested; furthermore, individuals are protected in their dwelling as indicated in the Fourth Amendment. Officers do have to acknowledge who they are upon knocking on someone’s door to whom they are serving the warrant. In the given scenario of the officer being prompted by a victim who was robbed and who could know the robber, the officer had probable cause to get a warrant.
Therefore, for the police to be involved, there must be a crime that has been committed or a violation of law that has been put in place by
Law is present in our daily life and in everything we do. We cannot think a second without law. Whatever we can see around us everything is connected with the law. Sometimes we can see it and sometimes we cannot see but feel it. Law is not just a thing to obey for yourself but making a peaceful society.
DEFINITION OF LAW: Law is outlined as the principles and regulations set by the governing authority, and have binding legal forces. It must be endorsed and obeyed by the citizens, subject to penalties or legal consequences. It depicts the will of the supreme power of the state. The basic purpose of law is to regulate the society, to safeguard and shield the rights of people and to resolve conflicts. It acts as barrier is preventing people from behaving in a negative manner that affects the rights and quality of life other people, hence violation of law implies the punishment of lawbreakers Dysfunction of Law: Dysfunction of law means failed to abide by the law.
