ipl-logo

Problem Of Memory Knowledge

756 Words4 Pages

In “The Problem of Memory Knowledge”, Michael Huemer describes, and ultimately argues against three accounts on how memory beliefs are justified. 1. The Inferential Theory 2. The Foundational Theory 3. The Preservation Theory 1. The Inferential Theory If I infer that P from my memory that P, together with the belief my memory is generally reliable. As Huemer proposed an example, I now seem to remember that the earth is 93 million miles away from the sun. In the past experience, those expectations formed by the memory where turned out to be true. This makes that his memories are highly reliable. With this in mind, it looks like it will be true that the sun is 93 million miles away from the earth. However, the problem with this the premise …show more content…

In this view that my justification for a memory is just my justification for the original belief. In this theory it does not involve in memory compared to the Inferential Theory. Suppose, God created an identical person five minutes ago, and named Mike 2. So, God had created Mike 2 based on Mike five minutes ago. Mike 2 was created with all the false memories of the past life, similar to Mike had. The only difference between them is Mike had lived in this world for many years, and Mike 2 was just came to this world five minutes ago with all prior knowledge. Mike 2 contain all the rational belief that Mike contains. Mike 2 is unaware of the fact that he came to this world five minutes ago and all his belief about past experience is false, and he don’t know that and has no reason to believe that all his past experience is false. So, suppose Mike has a justified belief that he has breakfast this morning, the same way Mike 2 also believe that he had breakfast this morning. Although, Mike 2 have a belief that he had breakfast is the morning and justiofied, it is through a mistake, because in reality he didn’t had breakfast in the morning; as he was created just five minutes ago with prior knowledge. In this case, both are correct in their own way where both are justified. This contradicts the theory of memory knowledge. Mike is having justified belief having breakfast through his sensory experience and Mike 2 has no such justification, because he had not had breakfast in the morning. In fact, he was just created couple minutes ago. Therefore, it can be said that Mike 2 is highly irrational even though he is naturally identical to Mike. The only difference between Mike and Mike 2 is that Mike 2 doesn’t contain any justification as

More about Problem Of Memory Knowledge

Open Document