The Case for Progressive Perspectives The average American citizen 's perspective of Congress is equivalent to only viewing a still of a three-hour documentary. This is a compelling factor of why mass Americans are adapting a negative prospective concerning what our country is doing and the, albeit slow, progress made by our public servants. News castors commonly broadcast stories covering the latest scandals and setbacks in congress. Moreover, Americans frequently foster cynical fallacies, creating a cleft of disunity and distrust within our Country. How do Americans expect to attain progress and create a better United States if these characteristics plague their everyday lives? The most efficient way to accomplish the change we need, is to support our government and, if needed, alter our current perspectives through educated research. …show more content…
The following analysis will expand upon one of the congressional caricatures observed in Hamilton 's article: the act of lobbying misrepresents the public 's opinion and should not be endorsed. Hamilton proposes a precisely balanced approach to lobbying. He states that lobbyists are principled people who play a large part of focussing the public 's attention on significant issues and are key to helping Congress members stay informed. He emphasizes that those who practice lobbying do so, in the open, as part of "the broader policy debate" (as cited in Stinebrickner, 2015, p. 117). As a previous member of congress, Hamilton 's opinion on the matter is soon justified and I agree with him. In the same manner, I also concur on the positive role of interest groups functioning in today 's Congress. Copious Americans are