Have you ever thought about the people you love being murdered? If so, what would you want to happen to the murderer? You would most likely want them to receive equal punishment. What about terrorists? What about treason? Your answer could likely be the same because both of these crimes also end with murder; innocent people being killed. Even though you may think the death penalty is unconstitutional and unfair, if someone actually killed a person close to you, wouldn’t you want that person to die for their crime? Some think that all murderers should die. The death of one innocent person negatively impacts everyone around them and may deprive society of a person that would have changed the world, had they been given the chance to live. …show more content…
This probably seemed like a good idea at the time, but there was a failure to consider what would happen to those already on death row. The issue with this situation is that the criminals that were on death row were released back into the world. Most people think that the government would be able to resentence them to life without parole; however, because of ‘double jeopardy’ the government can’t retry these criminals so releasing them was the only choice. Do you really want killers released into the world you live in? There is a common argument that the criminals have changed and will stop killing or betraying their country, but most of them are sent back to jail for the same crime. An example of this is when California created the Safe Act in 1976. This act resulted in 326 killers being released back into the state and 122 of them were sent back to jail for murder. This shows that you can’t take away the death penalty without it having a direct impact to