Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

976 Words4 Pages

The Electoral College has been widely debated since the Bush and Al Gore election in 2000 and has divided the country. In the 2016 election, the popular vote was nearly split in half, showing that people have very different political views. The founding fathers thought it would be the best way to choose a president, but times have changed. A system where a group of electors from each state has the power to override every vote cast in the America for the next president is absolutely intolerable. The Electoral College is no longer relevant now that a two-party system is in place. The Electoral College is unconstitutional and should be abolished because it gives too much power to states with over 20 electoral votes and ignores the voice of the people. Not many people are fully aware of what the Electoral College is, but just 538 people decide who will be the next president. Each …show more content…

But frankly, the founding fathers are dead. They may not have wanted to have a full democracy, but as time goes on things change. Democracy is a system of government for the whole population. The Electoral College is similar to a republic, leaving the ultimate decision in the hands of representatives. Some say the Electoral College provides certainty to the outcome of an election, but when it comes to the popular vote, a tie would be more than unlikely. A big argument is that the Electoral College forces presidential candidates to try and win the majority of each state. People in favor of the Electoral College say if the election was won by popular vote, candidates would only focus on large populations and ignore small states. That is not true because if there was a direct election, smart candidates would campaign all over the nation, trying to get as many votes a humanly possible ("Argument For and Against the Electoral College"