ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of America After The Trans-Pacific Partnership

874 Words4 Pages

America After the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Introduction
In an article from the New York Times it discussed how this past week President Donald Trump had many executive orders set forth in a busy first week in office. One of those orders would be him pulling the country out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The Trans-Pacific Partnership was a multiple way trade deal between the United States and 11 other countries (Baker, 2017). There were many pieces of this deal, but the main part of the deal for the United States was the idea of lower tariffs or free trade with these countries. TPP was a big deal that was enacted by former President Barack Obama. However, Trump had a more aggressive approach to trade with his “America First” approach …show more content…

It came with its pros and cons just as anything else. The New York Times covered this breaking news with a strong approach. The Times kept their bias out of this article which is always a pro. It is always preferred that bias is left out so the reader can create their own opinion on the topic presented. The points presented are thought provoking for sure. The author discussed the idea of China now getting the upper hand as a country after we back out of TPP. This is a more than fair point. Countries may now have no other choice, but to side with China since that is the only way they will be able afford certain goods and services from the U.S. This is concerning considering how Trump had such an aggressive approach when it came to China abusing us as a country. The Times also quoted how John McCain criticized this decision, saying it was “a serious mistake that would hurt America. It will send a troubling signal of American disengagement in the Asia-Pacific region at a time we can least afford it” (Baker, 2017). It is fair to see where Senator McCain is coming from with this point. We do not want to come across as if we do not care about other countries. However, the United States is always what should come …show more content…

When it comes to economics it is always important to ask what we should produce, but more importantly we should ask for whom we should be producing for? When it comes to the answer this, it should always be America first. America has adopted a lifestyle over the last decade of giving, but never really receiving anything in return. The country has been taken advantage of and what Trump was trying to say with ending this deal was that this will happen no more. Free trade is not a practical practice. Why should we allow for companies to be outsourced (to countries such as Mexico) and then allow them to bring their products back into this country free of charge. The United States has been losing companies and jobs to countries like Mexico and China for years and it is about time that it stopped. President Donald Trump is not trying to come across as though he does not care about other countries, it is just that Trump wants America to be the top priority. By doing so he is going to end free trade and not allow the U.S. to be take advantage of again. Companies such as Ford have already complied with Trump’s new proposal. Ford decided to not build their Mexico plant and instead expand upon their Michigan plant, therefore creating more jobs in America. I would have to cast my opposition to the points the author presented in this article. Although the points arisen were strong, I believe Trump made the right

Show More
Related
488 Words | 2 Pages

Countries such as Germany, France, Europe, Britain and Japan participated in the “sphere of influence” because China had valuable resources and these countries can control an area of trade in China. As shown in document A, the countries are reaching towards China to take their resources. The United States felt threatened and left out because they weren’t participating, they decided to create the policy as a coverup to join in the sphere of influence and take a role of power in China wealth. The United States had the right to create the policy because they believed that China wasn’t suitable and it was necessary for them to do it. As Theodore Roosevelt said in the Annual Message to Congress, if a country can govern themselves, they won’t need U.S interference.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

In the two-step dance with China, the European nations raced to carve China into mercantile spheres of influence. The U.K fought repeated opium wars. Nonetheless, the U.S maintained a more nuanced, enlightened open door policy built upon free markets. Additionally, the administration in the U.S pursued a relatively peaceful policy Vis a Vis China based upon shared interests in trade and political stability (Nathan & Gilley, 2003). China has since loomed large on Vietnam’s international decision making.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Along with the Confederation to begin the formation of Canada, the reciprocity debate of 1911 and NAFTA further impacted the development of Canada, because of its economic significance. The reciprocity debate of 1911 and NAFTA pronounced Canada economically through the flourishing of trade with other countries. The reciprocity agreement between Canada and the United States was instated to protect tariffs on goods traded between the two countries. Consequentially, the economy for Canada increased, with exports to the United States growing by 33%, post treaty.

Read More
1226 Words | 5 Pages

Trump’s attack on China for unfair trade relates to Madison and Jefferson’s proposal of stopping trade. The accusations and comments Trump has made throughout the course of his campaign and now Presidency can be predicted to have a high possibility of coming true, but only time will tell if these proposals are finalized. The hopes and future of America has been affected and changed from time to time. The guidance and leadership of a President not only reflects the possibilities of the nation, but the citizens who carry the weight of the country’s prosperity. Therefore the people can only hope that Trump will lead with mindfulness and dignity of the

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

Trade almost always benefits the countries who participate in it. There have been many trends towards freedom of trade in the United States ever since the very beginning of the nation. Trade boosts the economy by keeping it competitive and lowering prices, which increases the consumers purchasing power. Without trading between nations, the United States wouldn’t be what it is today, trade at the center of the United States is what shaped this country as well as foreign relations. Teddy Roosevelt has influenced trade and foreign relations in the United States arguably more than any other president to this day.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson believed that U.S. fortunes were linked to the ability of merchants to engage in international trade. However, they differed in their opinions of how much of a role international trade should play in American commerce. Jefferson’s policy encouraged a quasi-free-market trade system through which the United States could import and export goods freely with international partners. Even when Great Britain was imposing restrictions on U.S. ships and goods, Jefferson sought to remain trading partners through “friendly arrangements with the several nations with whom the restrictions exist…” or “by the separate act of our own legislature for countervailing their effects”12.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

President Trump didn’t want America to depend on countries like Russia or our enemies in the Middle East for importing oil. It only makes sense to not import from countries that aren’t our allies and in the process make them richer and stronger countries. President Trump’s Executive Order enabled America to produce more oil, natural gas, and shale energy. “President Trump gave the power back to the states in producing more energy, which led to the creation of more jobs.” In 2018, the United States exported more oil than we imported, for the first time in 70 years, per investors.com (“Trump Just Achieved What Every President since Nixon had Promised”). Energy Independence article (editorials).

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

He has done this through passionate speeches that appeal to the anger and the desire of Americans to “make America great again". Like Sanders, Trump has also brought new ideas to the 2016 election. Trump has argued that too many free trade agreements are forcing American manufacturing companies to move abroad. He also talks of the massive trade deficits the United States has with Mexico and China. Trumps biggest policy change from GOP norms is his plan of building a wall across the southern border of the United States to further reduce illegal immigrations.

Read More
1667 Words | 7 Pages

For far too long, U.S. foreign policy has been held hostage by the interests of the foreign policy establishment and the military industrial complex. Democrats must initiate a systematic reform of bureaucracy at every level in order to effect positive change in the relationship between elected leaders and those who carry out policy. Democrats must support continued American leadership in nuclear proliferation and arms control, but must fulfill these aims working within international systems. As an essential component of American values, properly managed free trade fulfills the Wilsonian tradition held dear by the electorate. However, a strong American economy is fundamental to national security and Democrats must continuously work to shape a trade policy that both protects American interests and supports global development.

Read More
326 Words | 2 Pages

As the U.S election results are revealed, many Canadian citizens fear the impact Mr. Donald Trump could cause upon Canada. Trump has promised to pull away the U.S. from any international climate agreements, saying that he will “shred” Obama’s greenhouse gas policies. Moreover, this will greatly affect Canada since Canada has numerous climate projects with the U.S. Having Trump as president could permanently damage the trade that Canada has maintained with the U.S., since Mr. Trump is pledging to overhaul U.S. trade relations, especially since approximately $51 billion in goods cross the Canada-U.S. border per month, according to TD Economics. Trump has demanded multiple times to have a renegotiation of the American Free Trade Agreement.

Read More
1632 Words | 7 Pages

Trump also addressed trade. The first trade agreement he promised to replace in his campaigns was the NAFTA trade deal. He again acknowledged the opposition when he stated this in his union address, “Many politicians came and went, pledging to change or replace NAFTA, only to do so, and then absolutely nothing happened.” However, unlike past administrations Trump takes this opportunity to share that he was able to replace NAFTA and sign a new fair-trade deal. Through various themes, Trump continues to rely on ethos to build trust with his audience, which he then expands on with the use of

Read More
1356 Words | 6 Pages

So, President Trump has two options: get his party to fall in line, or start toeing the party line. Currently, his stance on trade presents the clearest example of breaking party orthodoxy. Cast aspersions and firing ad-hominem attacks at your fellow Republicans (“little Marco,” “lyin’ Ted,” “low energy Jeb”). He should try to take the Freedom Caucus under his wing, not ostracize them. Take note of my tactics in constructing a new-age conservative coalition, an effort that started from my first time.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

Lastly Trump believes he should beat the competition, which means wage a trade war. He believes U.S. is in a struggle for supremacy with China, India, and lots of other places in the

Read More
258 Words | 2 Pages

However, after lending his support towards a tariff

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

If Donald Trump goes through with it, then Mexico is going to have the TrumpLand wall and are going to have to pay. He wants to repeal Obamacare “and replace it with something that benefits everybody.” Donald Trump also wants to “Turn off that spigot” of sending money to China (in the form of debt payments) by taxing them until “they behave properly.” He wants to end President Obama’s executive actions among immigration. He wants to change when somebody is born in the U.S, it automatically makes them a American citizen.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of America After The Trans-Pacific Partnership

Related Topics

Open Document