Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reasons why animal testing is wrong
Why animal testing is ineffective
Animal testing animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Double Trouble was an orange tabby cat whose life was full of Trouble. She was a gentle creature and should have been allowed to live the normal life of a cat. However, this was not to be. She was one of several cats at University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW) that were cruelly experimented on. These experiments caused her to develop infections, begin twitching, become depressed, and even cause half her face to be paralyzed.
Animal testing causes unneeded death to millions of animals that aren 't even protected under the Animal Welfare Act, and most experiments done on animals are flawed, wasting the lives of the animal subjects. But, there are also benefits to animal testing. For example, we wouldn 't have the polio vaccine or medical steps toward curing cancer. Even though that these benefits do exist it does not give these laboratories the right to abuse and force the animals into these tests, therefore, they should not be
Animal testing is cruel, unjust, and wasteful, and it needs to stop. It is used to test cosmetics, to gain scientific knowledge, and for tests in schools. The Humane Society states that animal testing is tests performed on live animals for basic biology, medicinal, safety, or health research. Even small procedures have the capabilities to cause the animal high stress or discomfort. Some animals are used in future experiments, but most are killed soon after the tests.
In the United States alone, an estimate of 100 million animals are used for testing and in European countries over 12 million animals are sacrificed each year for testing. Out of that large number, up to 90 percent are not counted in the official statistics of animals tested. 92 out of every 100 tests that pass in animals fails in humans and that number has increased 86 percent since 1985. It is not a very sufficient way of study because the results are often not accurate and at least 16 million dollars is spent each year. This research method is not effective
I believe the testing of animals for beauty products is not ethical and should stop. The debate of testing on animals has been going on for a long time. Aristotle debated this by saying that we as humans were at the top of the pyramid because we have the sense of reasoning and rational souls. In the scenario we face is that the rabbits are given injections in the eyes and this is very painful for them.
The term that is used to describe this is “stress-induced psychosis.” After seeing this footage, primatologist Dr. Jane Goodall stated, “In no lab I have visited have I seen so many chimpanzees exhibit such intense fear. The screaming I heard when chimpanzees were being forced to move toward the dreaded needle in their squeeze cages was, for me, absolutely horrifying” (Goodall). This investigation shows that the majority of people accept animal research because they think that animals don’t suffer, and that it’s scientifically necessary. On the contrary, the New England Anti-Vivisection Society (NEAVS) science team has methodically looked at the use of animals in research and determined that it is not predictive for humans and is often irrelevant and
Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.
Considering Alternative Methods: If you’re still in the camp ‘principally against anything anthropocentric’, then that’s fine. It also means you’re going to consider any animal testing outright wrong, if it’s purpose is to make discoveries for humans. That’s why alternative methods are so important, because they allow us to avoid human extinction – which would cause the extinction of all other animals – without committing the sins of humanity that Maheny talks about. If you’re pro-anthropocentric, but also get pleasure in needlessly slaughtering animals, then allow me to elaborate on just how ‘needless’ this slaughtering really is.
Furthermore, scientists usually kill the animals after the experiment. Examples of animal testing include forcing dangerous substances into animals’ bodies, exposing animals to radiation, and putting animals in stressful or frightening situations (Cruelty Free International). Many animals in scientific research are
How could making an animal suffer possibly ever be justified? “Rabbits get put in restraints for something called the draze test. ”-animal testing. Every animal on earth has a heart, a pain tolerance level, and a life. Just because maybe something does not screech, scream, punch, or put you in some sort of threat does not mean a thing.
Some of these experiments would never be used because some of them do not work or they are too dangerous for human use, but still the animals used those experiments would die. Also, animals are not used only for medical testing, it should not be done because medical testing at least had help us improving medical treatments, but cosmetic testing and other kinds of products like detergent does not. Animals should not be used to test these kind of products because this only harm the animals and does not leave us with anything that would truly help to improve our living conditions, the thing it does is to torture a lot of
Each experiment will either be for chemical, medical, drug, or cosmetic testings. Many of the animals in the testings will be tormented either to death, or on the brink of it. For example, they will be forced to inhale the toxic fumes of what they are testing, have their skin burned off or have it blistered from the harsh chemicals. The animals are confined in small cages and are socially deprived and physically deprived of the kinds of nutrients they need.
Animal testing is not ok for so many reasons. The first I have to say is about the hardship and pain to the animals. Animals feel pain along with humans, so why do we test on them? What if a bunch of giant animals took you from your natural home, nearly starved you, then tested on you with weird equipment in someplace strange? Yeah, pretty awful.
This included 1,272 monkeys, 5,771 rabbits, 24,556 guinea pigs, and 33,280 hamsters. This shows that scientists don’t care about what the animals are going through, pain or no pain, they just want to advance in medical techniques, do their job, and get their money. Although humans may benefit from successful animal research, the pain, suffering, and deaths of these animals are not worth this kind of benefit. Animals and humans are alike in many ways. We both think, feel, behave, and experience pain.
Most of the time, the animals used are killed at the end of the experiment, but some animals are reused in other experiments. Animal testing can be conducted at universities,