More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues of animal testing animal testing
The ethics around animal testing
The ethics around animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
All in all, animal testing equals animal cruelty. Humans have made many advancements over the years, however; it seems as though we have left our morals and ethic values behind. Boss Tweed- William Magear Tweed was a democratic politician that owned Tammany Hall, the Democratic party’s political machine, a director of the Erie Railroad, Tenth National Bank, New York Printing Co.,elected to the House of Representatives, and was a huge landowner.
Did you know that millions of animals suffer in the U. S. just because of animal testing? When these animals are getting tested, they feel pain, but cannot react to it because they cannot speak up. To begin with, animal testing is not effective. Many animals do not get all of the same diseases that humans get.
Animal testing is cruel and uncalled for, all animals deserve to live a long painless life and should not be tested upon. Companies test any animal they can get there hands on dogs, cats, mice, rats, reptiles, even monkeys. They put the animals in a cage with no holes no bars and “...they expose them with deadly chemicals the animals are forced to breathe in, or they put the animal in a restraint device, sometimes they even drill holes into their skull...” www.peta.org says. These animals they test never get to see the light of day or breath fresh air they sit and stay having no choice but to take the abuse. Abuse that they shouldn’t have to face cause they did nothing wrong infact it was the people who did wrong.
The way animals are treated in labs is unnecessary and cruel. In an article called, “Animal Testing is Bad Science,” the Animal Welfare Act is mentioned; “It allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged.” In that same article, it explains that painkillers are not required to be used. Scientists are demeaning the value of innocent animal lives, using them as test subjects, and forgetting they have a nervous system and brain that feels pain the same as you and I. Fortunately, the following recent discovery has saved millions of animals’ lives. From “Breakthroughs That Might Mean the End of Animal Testing,” I learned of a substitute for animals in the lab.
The laboratories in which rabbits and other animals are tested, the rabbits are held in small cages by themselves for weeks and months. There is no sunlight and the rabbits are not allowed to go outside. Rabbit 32 which is one of the 170,000 rabbits who will be killed this year due to animal testing, is locked up by himself waiting for people to do test on him. Some of the tests that Rabbit 32 has endured is being fed chemicals to see how it affects the rabbit. Another test that the scientist do is, a device to hold the rabbit down so it cannot move and the scientist drip chemicals into the eyes and onto the skin and wait to see how the rabbits react to the chemical.
Animal testing has been a subject of controversy for many years and there have been some great discoveries because of it, however, has this practice been done ethically? For a cosmetic company to inject rabbit’s eyes of chemicals, thus causing it pain, is unethical and immoral. This practice negates the theory of Kant’s Practical Imperative, where animals are used for experiments, not only for life and death experiments, but for experiments that indicates whether a product has irritating side effects for humans, for example (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2015). The immorality of this practice is where scientists are subjecting pain and sometimes torture to animals for results to tests. It is immoral, as Kant suggests, to subject sentient beings to pain
Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.
These animals have no way to tell the scientists conducting tests on them to stop, or that they are hurting and they can’t take the pain anymore. These animals are innocent and have done nothing to deserve the torture they go through while they endure these countless experiments. An alternative for testing on these animals could be to test on criminals. While the US accounts
They feel pain (Source B), but is that really the point to stop animal testing? Animals do feel pain in a biological perspective; however, animals and humans do not think alike, feel alike, or experience alike. This proves that humans and animals are not on the same scale (Source
We wouldn’t subject our pets to burning, starving, and isolation, so why is it okay to subject other animals to this cruel treatment? Animal testing is harmful not only because it is unsafe, but because it poses a question of moral judgement. Testing on animals should be illegal because it is unethical, drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe, and many animals lack the protection required for their safety. Many people are unaware of the torture animals in labs must endure when being tested on.
It is often claimed that many experiments on animals are painless, and that it is extremely important to making new medical discoveries. Some will argue the animal Welfare Act and the Public Health service policy on animals being tested require researchers to keep the animals away from fear unless it affects their research (“Is Research Painful?”). Another common argument is every major medical advancement is attributable to experiments on animals (“Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint”). While it is true that the Animal Welfare act is supposed to protect animals, that doesn’t mean the act fully protects them. Also, experimenting on animals is nowhere as effective as researching on humans has been.
Because… according to University Wire more than 100 million animals are tortured due to experimentation practices, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats and mice. These experiments include forcing them to eat thing, expose them to radiation, stressful situations, and sometimes getting rid of organs. Therefore…testing on animals is painful, and careless to them. 4.) My opponent says....animals are not humans, and are good for research
People have animals, especially dogs and cats, as pets. They take care of animals and spend their lives together. However, sacrificing animals is necessary for human life to survive. Moreover, using animal experimentation is common because this can improve our health. Henry E. Heffner and Carl Cohen who are proponents of animal experimentation point out that it is necessary because it can protect human health.
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.
Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.
