ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Being A Hunter-Gatherer

656 Words3 Pages

Environmental science I think that it is very interesting how we came from being the hunter-gatherer people into becoming the agricultural people all simultaneously. I would have to say that I do agree with Jared Diamond on how we came to be agricultural people. He makes some very clear and accurate reasoning’s about how we came to be. I personally wish that most of us would have kept the hunter-gather instinct that is naturally in us and we could exploit that more throughout us nowadays. The first reason would be that you really do have to work less when you are a hunter or a gatherer in society. My grandpa is an old time farmer. That's how he lives and raised my mom. SoI know first hand that it works but I also know how stressful it is and how immensely hard it is too. it works and it can be done. But I also am a super avid hunter and those some days I may not get anything there are days that it is a ton easier to go and kill an animal then it is to wait and raise a garden or even …show more content…

Its healthier because farmers tend to only focus on certain cash crops and not a varied diet of crops. So the hunter-gather people could get all their nutrients and everything they needed when they gathered and they weren’t just stuck to one crop, and it showed too. "Compared to the hunter-gatherers who preceded them, the farmers had a nearly 50 per cent increase in enamel defects indicative of malnutrition, a fourfold increase in iron-deficiency anemia..." (Diamond) Also with the added diet that is very healthy for them, they also are less stressful too. they spend a lot less time then a farmer would do on his farm. Diamond states," the average time devoted each week to obtaining food is only 12 to 19 hours for one group of Bushmen." These are many of health benefits on how hunter-gather people are better off then

Show More
Related
539 Words | 3 Pages

In Paleolithic period, the humans mostly were hunters and gatherers. According to the Crash Course video, John Green implied in the Paleolithic period everybody would hunt or gather for food, but in the Neolithic Period not everybody had to be involved in food production. One of the reasons why Neolithic Period is better is because of food security. Not having to worry about food increases the chances of survival. According to John Green, not having to worry about food allowed people to do other things, like develop farming technology.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Agriculturalists were usually healthy because they would grow crops and have food and eat a diverse diet and same thing with the hunter gatherers except they didn't have a big topic of food to choose from. Hunter gatherers and agriculturalists have okay things. They have what they need and that's good enough for them. Their different in some ways and the same in other ways. They live good for their lives.

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

Archaic Hunters and Gathers Throughout North America there was various groups of people that were referred to as Hunters and Gatherers. They were found all over North America and each group was similar but different in many ways. These groups of people were known as The Archaic Hunters and Gatherers. As Archaic Hunters and Gathers grew rapidly in numbers and with all the big game gone they had to find a way to adapt. With their ancestor the Paleo-Indians having hunted all the big game to extinction they had to develop another way of survival.

Read More
623 Words | 3 Pages

Theodore Roosevelt said “speak softly and carry a big stick” some people have no idea what he means by this quote, We never thought wolves would become as much of a problem until now. I believe the wolf population is happening right under our noses and we don't even know it yet. Even though the wolf numbers might not recover, wolves should be hunted because wolves are killing large numbers of deer and livestock and wolves are endangering humans and farmers. Many people believe that the wolf population will not recover if the humans continue to hunt them,or increase our hunting on them. ”The latest population survey results estimate that 470 wolf packs lived in Minnesota's wolf range this past winter, 212 more wolves than estimated on the survey conducted in winter 2013”.(DNR).The wolf population is increasing when people are worried that it won't be able to recover from hunting and that they should be endangered.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Today kids take in our history from various perspectives , yet what they don 't do is tell all of significant data . How Columbus did to the Arawaks of the Bahamas , how Cortes did to the Aztecs of Mexico , how Pizarro did to the Incas of Peru , and how the English explorers of Virginia and Massachusetts did to the Powhatans did to the Pequots. The most obliteration was in 1942 when Columbus assaulted and about wiped a whole masses out . Europeans delivered comes about for the duration of my life today since life would be differing we wouldn 't have a huge bit of the stuff we have at this moment . We wouldn 't have as much compelling events , also we would have a more prominent measure of the Native people than we have today .

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine you being robbed and scared while seeing it with your own eyes?   Well that's what happens in this story and even worst.  I will write about the arguments of the native americans.  

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

The demise of the hunter gather society is a result of the beginning of an ice age and the need for a reliable food source. In turn, they completely reinvented basic means for obtaining food through the development of agriculture, refocusing energies to innovations and cultural development. The methods that hunter gather societies used to track food was not time efficient as stated in the Guns, Germs, and Steel video with Jared Diamond. It is not productive to track down each animal, spot the quarry, and use primitive bows and arrows for it is not guaranteed capture.

Read More
339 Words | 2 Pages

In the article The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race the author Jared Diamond explains how the development of agriculture in humanity affected the evolution of our modern society for the worst. He proved this thesis with sufficient points, however, the scientific evidence behind the Luddites’ beliefs are limited. The corroboration behind agricultural advancements being a substantial step for mankind is far more concrete than the opposing side. Livestock and cultivating vegetation was the most significant switch humanity has taken, and molded our world to what it is today.     Paleopathologists have recorded that the health statuses of people became critically worse after the Neolithic Period, when civilizations switched to

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

The Worst Mistake In History As far back as archaeologists can recall, hunting and gathering has been the main source of food for humankind. As populations started to grow many families found it hard to get their hands on food, which led to the rise of agriculture. In the article,“The Worst Mistake in the History of Humankind,” by Jared Diamond, he explains how agriculture, although viewed as progress for modern civilizations, was indeed the worst decision humankind has ever made. In the article, Diamond argues that although agriculture was an effective way to increase people 's food supply, it came with many downfalls as well.

Read More
267 Words | 2 Pages

From living in a world full of hunters and gatherers to the world full of farmers. I agree with Diamond for starting "worst mistake’ in human history?" because Agriculture damaged a lot of us rather than helping us. Hunting had a lot of benefits rather than harming us. The archaeologists emphasized how hunters had a better diet than the farmers.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

Individuals or groups of people have always had one thing in mind and that is surviving. Surviving means able to expand themselves without losing their traditional social structure and trying to fit in a larger network. Keeping track of who you are and come from holds the cultural meaningful by holding the group together. The Neolithic Revolution has been able to evolve and become a crucial part of being human by lineage exogamy, patrilineal, and matrilineal descent, and kinship and new reproductive technologies. Lineage exogamy means that lineage members must look for their marriages partners in other lineages.

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

According to Marlene Zuk many of the expectations on which it is founded are questionable. While not disregarding the position of development in shaping us, we also find that it is also quite conflicting. Zuk picks the assumptions of the ‘paleofantasists’ (paleofantasists stem from the idea that development makes tiny changes over millions of years, so we haven't had sufficient time to adapt to the modern industrial world—and that we would be healthier and happier if we lived more like our ancient ancestors.) to pieces and shows how ill-started many of their ideas are. Personally, this just proved that the current interest for life in the Palaeolithic is just a modern version of the myths of the Noble Savage or an earthly version of the legend

Read More
1582 Words | 7 Pages

If the world today gave up hunting, wildlife would become non existent and animals would struggle to thrive due to disease and overpopulation. Outdoorsmen also gain plentiful amount of experience while hunting. They gain relationships, knowledge of the outdoors, and they maintain an old tradition and keep it alive and thriving. In the future hunting may become an even more pressing and controversial subject; however, we must do everything in our power to keep hunting alive. Hunting has a deeper meaning to some people and to take that away from them is in some ways inhumane.

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

Hunting creates a national economic impact of about $61 billion and has supported over seven-hundred billion jobs. Hunting also brings in about $1.4 billion in state tax revenues and $1.7 billion in federal income taxes. Hunting isn’t a cheap past time, in order to even attempt to get an animal you must first purchase a license every season. Hunting is well regulated between the federal and state governments in order to prevent over hunting. The problem that can come up is illegal hunting and poaching.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Wildlife Conservation is often seen as a bad thing, but if you look at it from my perspective, then it is actually a good thing. People think of it as holding wild animals captive, but we are actually protecting them from poachers. The purpose of Wildlife Conservation is to protect the animals in danger, which I am in agreement 110%. Other people argue that we shouldn’t have conservations, but they don’t know the harm that can happen to unprotected animals.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Being A Hunter-Gatherer

Related Topics

Open Document