Pros And Cons Of Confederate Government

480 Words2 Pages

In a unitary system of government, the central government holds most of the power. The unitary state still has local and regional governmental offices. These places are still under the government. Like in the United Kingdom, parliament still holds power in the U.K... Giving power to certain parts of the government or taking the power away as well. France is another unitary government. The national government can decide what directions they want to choose but they are never able to carry it out any act or move independently. These movements basically have a lot of control but can’t give out the call unless approved or they have somewhat control but still cannot make any moves without verifying. The federalist system consists of sharing power between …show more content…

Modern Germany is also a federalist republic. The national government shares power with provincial political entities, known as “Lander.” Confederations have a weak central authority that derives all its powers from the state or provincial governments. Meaning the states has all the power to independent actions for their nation. They maintain the military forces and the money they make. They may also make treaties with other nations. The United States used to be a confederate state under the articles of confederation. The confederation government was too weak for the United States because it was growing so big. So the founding fathers created the federalist government and it is still used till this day. Commonwealth of Independent States, which is comprised of several nations that were formerly part of the Soviet Union. They formed a partnership so they could form a stronger national body than each individual state could maintain. Advantages and disadvantages are these. In a unitary system, laws and policies throughout the state are uniform laws are more easily passed since they need only be approved by the central government and laws are rarely contradictory since there is only