Pros And Cons Of DNA Profiling And Fingerprinting

In today’s society, forensic science has become a very important part of the judicial system, however, that was not always the case. When new forensic technology was first introduced it was looked upon as a scientific idea that may or may not have been accurate. There are advantages and disadvantages for the implementation of forensic science. The efficiency and accuracy of forensic evidence were called into question and the only way to find out was by experimental use and practice. Consequently, the integration of forensic science in regards to DNA profiling and fingerprinting has made the crime investigative and prosecution process in the justice system more efficient and accurate.

Forensic science in the form of DNA profiling is a great

In 30 years of progress, DNA profiling and fingerprinting became one of the most powerful tools available and the evidence it provided was said to be accurate. In 2015, the estimated number of profiles held on DNA databases worldwide is 60 million (Goodwin). In the United States, West Virginia was the first state whose high court ruled in favor of admitting DNA evidence in courts with a high evidential strength. Since the integration of forensic science was very quick, the process was not perfected before it was made public, allowing mistakes to happen and while forensic technology was reaching new highs, there needed to be people who were focusing on fixing the procedure that already existed. Speed plays an important role in the integration of forensic science because it shows how DNA fingerprinting and profiling revolutionized crime investigative procedures. Even today, the technology that Jeffreys created is still being improved upon because the process is not perfect and scientists are making efforts to make DNA fingerprinting and profiling more efficient and accurate than

The first DNA-based conviction in the United States occurred in 1987 when Tommy Lee Andrews was convicted of rape in Florida. DNA tests matched Andrews DNA from a blood sample with traces of semen that was found in a rape victim. There have been thousands of court cases where DNA evidence has helped convict criminals that may or may not have been convicted if DNA technology had not existed. Every time DNA evidence benefited a court case, it proved to the people that DNA technology is accurate and should be given evidential strength. In court, some pieces of evidence has more evidential strength than others and due to the overwhelmingly efficient and accurate data provided by DNA profiling and fingerprinting, DNA technology became a very important method used in