ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Democracy Tocqueville

822 Words4 Pages

Alexis de Tocqueville penned Democracy in America after he spent month America in the 1831, where he witnessed a new democratic system. He found it’s concepts to have unique strengths and weaknesses that he believed could be the inspiration for the new government of post-revolution France. The concepts of limiting individualism, encouraging positive associations, and moderating the tyranny of the majority that Tocqueville observed during his trip in America helped maintain the new democratic republic built after the revolution. As soon as America became free from British rule, their groundwork for their new government helped cement them as a true democracy since it contended with individualism. Tocqueville noticed that after a successful …show more content…

Tocqueville feared that in a democracy the people would assume that the truth always lies with the majority, since individuals are prone to trust public opinion over the ideas of the minority, crumbling citizens’ ability to question their government 's authority and to think for themselves. The dangers of unchecked and unlimited power in America’s centralized government would become the majority and lead to the absolute tyranny. However, while the government is centralized, its sphere of influence is limited because of the decentralized administration. American is able to moderate the political tyranny of the majority through the checks and balances in the three branch system of government made by the decentralized administration, but must take caution of a social tyranny of the majority being …show more content…

Today, we still see Tocqueville’s practices being relevant through the new technologies available and it’s interaction with the political and social spheres of America. As the mainstream usage of the internet and social media has steadily increased, it has become easier for people to revolutionize the concepts found in Democracy in America. Where before associations were only made locally or through newspapers, there is now the possibility for American citizen to make fast, instant associations across the world. With social spheres widening, the minority is capable of garnering influence and has the ability speak out against the majority more than ever before through. Although older generations have critiqued social media by saying that it is isolating younger people, individualism as Tocqueville perceived it is extremely limited since there is the exchange of new thoughts and people can common goals to fight for such as the recent DAPL protest which gained traction and success through social media. Since there are so few regulations for the internet, the freedom it allows one to see Tocqueville 's concepts for democracy in a purer form in not just America, but throughout the world.
Tocqueville envisioned that his country would flourish under the democratic concepts he observed while in America. However, he considered the delicate balance each of the concepts had, knowing that if one restricted or left unrestrained, it would harm the nation. In this new technology reliant

Show More
Related
530 Words | 3 Pages

President Andrew Jackson was an influential, “common man” of the people. And though Jackson’s opponents, the National Republicans and the Whig party, have accused him of being despotic through his use of vetoes, expansion of presidential power, and neglect of constitution, it was clear to Jackson and the public that he had merely sought to follow the will of the people. Therefore his presidency had, indeed, reflected an era of democracy. President Jackson himself was a symbol of democracy of the Egalitarian Age. This is clear in his election in 1828.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

After already obtaining an uneven distribution of wealth in the nation among the three estates, the debt from the American Revolution took a toll on France’s financial stability, practically bankrupting them. Struggling from the large gap between the wealthy and the poor, it was suggested by Sieyes that the third estate, commoners (97%), were the people who made up the nation of France and that they needed to take a stand, which they did. The third estate followed Rosseau, who’s ideas were developed from Locke, on his ideas of “general will” of the nation, and that they should form a national assembly of their own since they were the nation (SMW 76). The French Revolution unfolded into three phases of constitutional monarchy, radical republicanism, and military consolidation, resulting in the issue of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, among other accomplishments. Also following the American Revolution, and the Declaration of Independence, the French used Locke’s ideas in his Second Treatise of Government as a guideline to their new constitution.

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

Democracy is the foundation of the American government, and its application creates the opportunity of social class intermingling. Albeit in the form of social interaction or working one’s way up the chain of command. The labor standoff between the Homestead workers and management became the tipping point for manners in American democracy. This tipping point resulted in violent altercations, assassination attempts, and ultimately broken spirits. The Homestead strike in the 19th century not only exemplifies how democracy instigated class blending, but also diminished morality.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Tocqueville analyses the success of the American system under the United States Constitution. He states: “…the real weakness of federal governments has almost always been in the exact ratio of their nominal power. Such is not the case in the American Union, in which, as in ordinary governments, the Federal power has the means of enforcing all it is empowered to demand” (Tocqueville 158). Thus, the distinct nature of the American political system arises from the ability of the central government to execute the laws it has produced – a principle of federalism.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

Alexis De Tocqueville was a French aristocrat was a well-educated, political thinker, and historian, who came to America to study the prisons and jails. He arrived in America with longtime friend Gustave de Beaumont, in May of 1831 and stayed about 9 months. Upon his return home he published his travels and experiences in America, in his book Democracy in America. He believed in Democracy and he envisioned France as a Democracy.

Read More
1408 Words | 6 Pages

Scholars from all over the Western world have analyzed and discussed the impact of democracy has had for the citizens of the United States, for over 200 years. Each new period throughout American history, has brought a new concept of being an individual in a democratic society. One flaw scholars from the late nineteenth century saw with democracy was that the majority ruled and if an individual part of the minority their voices were not heard, even if the minority was just and the majority unjust. Thus the democracy most Americans are proud to have is primarily individualistic and can be deemed corrupt because of the focus of majority rule, which might not be the wisest decision. Alexis de Tocqueville was a French writer who wrote several essays on his visit to the United States.

Read More
1448 Words | 6 Pages

In 1831 French sociologist and political theorist Alexis De Tocqueville and a lawyer he befriended named Gustave de Beaumont, spent nine months traveling around America studying its prisons and came back with a full report on the cultural, political and psychological life in America. While Beaumont wrote about the penitentiary system, Tocqueville focused more in the cultural and political life in America. He wrote two essays and published them in a book called Democracy in America. He discussed the possible threats to democracy and the possible dangers of democracy. He believed that religion and equality were the greatest ideas and they were the most advanced in the United States and that's why democracy worked so well in America.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

Alexis De Tocqueville wrote one of the most relevant texts on modern democratic nations through his analysis of the United States of America, recorded in his book “Democracy in America”. The relevancy in his social and political theory lies in the fact that his analysis of the democratic state, the conditions it arises in and its consequential effects can be seen in political trends that followed after his time and can be observed even today. He certainly was able to accurately predict America’s future as a superpower in the conclusion of the first volume, wherein he states, “They (Americans) were born to rule the sea as the Romans were born to conquer the world.” . However, despite the nature of his reputable political theory, many have justifiably

Read More
200 Words | 1 Pages

De Tocqueville doesn 't view liberty as an attribute part of the democratic era. He believes that the only character that is associated with this era is equality. He explains in his theory that people of this era prize equality over liberty, although he doesn 't deny that democratic people value liberty, because everyone can take part in it and enjoy it effortlessly, as opposed to liberty where you have to "sacrifice" to achieve it (De Tocqueville, 1835). He holds that equality creates individualism, which means people separate themselves from one another, their ancestors and the future generations, that leads to tyranny and despotism. On the contrary, he claims that during the aristocratic ages, people were not selfish and careless about others ' needs because "aristocracy links everybody, from peasant to king" (De Tocqueville, 1835).

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

He puts forward the idea of “freedom of opinion” (Tocqueville 106) and constitutes it as “independence of mind and real freedom of discussion” (Tocqueville 104). Unlike Locke, this stretches far beyond what is done. Tocqueville is careful to differentiate this liberty from the freedom of speech, as this freedom from opinion is more meant to indicate the freedom to follow different paths of thought and not be unfairly judged for it. Once again, it is the majority who suppresses this in Tocqueville’s opinion, as scorn and persecution for unwanted opinions permeate throughout society (Tocqueville 105). Tocqueville’s entanglement of liberty and what is right means that a majority’s limitation of liberty is unjust, while Locke’s concept of liberty means it must necessarily be restrained by a majority in order to protect the principle aim of government, to protect

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

Furthermore, taking the work as a whole, one finds that main problems of a democracy are the following: a disproportionately high portion of power in the legislative branch, an abuse of or lack of love for freedom, an excessive drive for equality, individualism, and materialism. The elements that Tocqueville believes can most successfully combat these dangerous democratic tendencies are: an independent and influential judiciary, a strong executive branch, local self-government, administrative de-centralization, religion, well-educated women, freedom of association, and freedom of the press. Tocqueville directly applies this newfound thesis to American democracy and explains how this situation can affect the United States. He references this thesis in talking about the pros and cons to American democracy, specifically the dangers and benefits of the

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

Looking after the above realities and information, it is very hard to believe that the history reaches an end. In fact, even more new challenges occur to the democratic values. Although, it is true that the number of democratic countries has been rising up from 35 in 1970 to 120 in 2014, it is unlikely to see that democracy system alone will exist as viable form of human government. John Mearsheimer pointed out some flaws of Fukuyama’s claim by saying that liberal democracy is no on the march. There two notions to mention that spreading democracy and spreading liberal democracy are different.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Democracy was often viewed by many who saw it as akin to anarchy and mob rule even as late as the nineteenth century. It was only until the revolutions which rose around the eighteenth century that democracy began to be seen as a serious force, which would eventually shape political discourse on a large, international scale. The following revolutions and rebellions were influenced greatly by these events in history. Even with the cruelty and its ultimate failure, it could be argued that the goals and events of the French Revolution is still relevant in modern society and has a large influence in future democracy with their goal of overthrowing government for equality and showcasing the dangers of mob rule.

Read More
1664 Words | 7 Pages

Democracy is the concept of freedom and respect of one 's rights based on the idea that monarchies or didctatorships have no more place within societies of the XXI siecle. In fact, people living within a community do not need superior authority to respect and beheive according the social norms. Participative democracy in my own opinion would be the key or the expression of a the best set of democratic institutions The European continent where democracy was born in the twentieth century has undergone multiple totalitarianism. Democratic fields is therefore limited to the implementation of a set of safeguards preventing the arrival in power of leaders against the will of the majority.

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

He wrote this book in 1985. Alain de Benoist had an assumption that how liberal “market democracy” would later become the opponent to what was supposed to be. Author touches very deep and valuable points in this book.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Democracy Tocqueville

Related Topics

Open Document