ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

785 Words4 Pages

Dropping the Atomic Bomb The debate of whether or not the U.S. should've dropped the atomic bomb is a popular one. There are many different perspectives that are researched and made. Based on the information I have read, I feel that the dropping of the atomic bomb was unnecessary and caused more harm rather than good. One main factor when it comes to the decision of dropping the bomb is how destructive it really is. The article on the site "History" titled"Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki", discusses the bomb's impact on civilians. In this article, it is written that these bombings resulted in civilian casualties reaching numbers around 70,000-135,000 in Hiroshima. In Nagasaki, the estimated casualties were from 60,000-80,000. …show more content…

However, even without the threat of a bomb, there would be a very real and probable chance that the Japanese would surrender. By this point, the majority of Japanese resources had been cut off by the U.S. one way or another. Allied efforts were able to reduce Japanese shipments of food, oil, and war materials by about 85%. Along with this, mass groups of Japanese soldiers were unable to return home due to Allied blockades. In the article, "Debate over the Japanese Surrender" from the site "Atomic Heritage Foundation", it is stated that revisionists believed that the Japanese would've been willing to surrender without the use of atomic bombs if the U.S. were willing to compromise a surrender where Japan can remain to have their emperor. In fact, many authority figures during this time thought it best to keep the emperor in authority. Offering the Japanese a surrender in which they don't need to lose their emperor is the most ideal and would make surrender more likely. The main reason that the soldiers continue to fight is to show their loyalty and dedication to the emperor. With this idea that impacts the chances of Japanese surrender immensely, the need for the atomic bomb is just about zero. Even yet, if the Japanese were still hesitant to surrender, dropping the bomb with no notice isn't reasonable. Giving Japan time to consider their choices, including the conditional surrender, there is a more likely chance of surrender than

Show More
Related

Was The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper

776 Words | 4 Pages

When America had dropped the atomic bomb, Japan was in a very weakened state. The navy and air force were destroyed, the land had been surrounded by other armies, and the supplies had been cut off (David M., 421). By these observations, it can be concluded that Japan was in a position much weaker than the had been at the start of the war and recognition of defeat could be seen. This defeat, however, was not declared by Japan and they continued to decline to surrender. Their decline to surrender ultimately led the need of the atomic bombs.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

882 Words | 4 Pages

Document 33 shows a propaganda shows the amount of damage the bombs would do, Japan still did not surrender. Another piece of evidence is document 71: I know the Japanese intimately. The Japanese will not crack. They will not crack morally or psychologically or economically, even when eventual defeat stares them in the face.

Read More

Drop The Bomb Dbq

345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More

The Manhattan Project Truman Pros And Cons

1030 Words | 5 Pages

Not surprisingly one bomb wasn't enough for Japan's surrender it took Two atomic bombs. I believe the decision to drop the bomb was right. The world was divided on a life saving decision to drop the atomic bomb many people believed it was a wrong, that it wasn't necessary to drop such a devastating weapon but the dauntless decision of dropping the weapon was a brave and right decision it didn't just save millions of American lives it saved millions of Japanese lives as well. Truman even warned Japan before dropping the bomb. But the Japanese were in human and taught not to surrender so the decision to drop the bomb helped end World War II and saved Millions of lives from

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

676 Words | 3 Pages

Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

717 Words | 3 Pages

The bombs caused so much damage that the cities bombed over 70 years ago are still recovering from the mass destruction today. For example, statistics show that 192,020 people died in Hiroshima, either instantly or over time because of

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

650 Words | 3 Pages

If they dropped the atomic bomb on Japan, they would not have to worry about them fighting back and would not have to keep making more weapons just to defeat the Japanese. It is expensive to manufacture weapons over and over, dropping the atomic bomb would just be a one time thing and it would save time as well. Also, If the Americans and Japanese fought on the island of Kyushu, then more Americans would die as well, if they dropped the atomic bomb then lots of lives would be saved. Also, Nicholas Kristoff said that military officials were likely to fight on, furiously, until the end willing to "Sacrifice 20 million Japanese lives," as late as August of 1945.” (Doc. I)

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

898 Words | 4 Pages

If you were president Truman, would you drop the bomb? The Manhattan project had been in the works for 3 years, and finally, on August 6th and 9th, 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. History on the net provides many reasons as to why the atomic bomb was the best option possible. While some people believe the bomb was unnecessary and there was no need for it to have been dropped, others believed that it had to have been dropped as it saved lives. The US should have dropped the bomb, because it was dropped after careful consideration from experienced military officials, it shortened the war, and the Japanese committed many atrocities and war crimes.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

805 Words | 4 Pages

They were so desperate that they were sending kamikaze to U.S. ships in the Pacific (Doc. C). This action showed America just how desperate the Japanese truly were, meaning that they were already winning the war (Doc. C). According to the Air Force Strategy Bombing Survey, “certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945 (well before the date of the [proposed] invasion) Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped” (Doc. K). This means that the Survey agreed that the war would have ended even without the bombing. Furthermore, Dwight Eisenhower stated, “I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act.... first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and second because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

927 Words | 4 Pages

This means that the Japanese would refuse to surrender, they would rather die than surrender and dishonor their families. They were difficult to defeat because they would never surrender, so

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

743 Words | 3 Pages

The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.” (Leahy, I Was There) Leahy goes on to say, “wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.” He and others who disagree with Truman’s decision argue that Japan was already going to surrender to America.

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

Japan had to accept unconditional surrender; if they disagreed with that request, America would drop the bomb. What made the Japanese surrender was the retention of their emperor; anything else couldn’t have forced a Japanese surrender, including the attack of the atomic bomb. As Japan's Prime Minister Suzuki spelled out on June 9, 1945. “Should the Emperor system be abolished, they [the Japanese people] would lose all reason for existence…. [and have] no choice but to go on fighting to the last man” (Butow).

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

961 Words | 4 Pages

Emperor Hirohito announced his country’s surrender on August 15, citing the devastating power of “a new and devastating bomb.” Was dropping an atomic bomb too extreme given the situation? Were their other options to end the war? Did it have anything to do with America flexing its muscles at the Soviet Union? In my opinion, the nuclear bomb should have never been an option for ending the war between the United

Read More

Why Was Hiroshima Justified

1840 Words | 8 Pages

If Japan agreed to the declaration, America would not drop the atomic bomb and Japan would

Read More

Essay On The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

934 Words | 4 Pages

According to U.S. estimated, 60,000 to 70,000 people were killed by the bomb, 140,000 were injured many more were made homeless as a result of the bomb and some of them were missing. A very dangerous radiation reached over 100,000 kilometers. In the blast, thousands of people died instantly. The city is completely destroyed, there are 90,000 buildings and 60,000 of them were completely destroyed by the explosion. In all, approximately 33% or ⅓ of Hiroshima is completely destroyed.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

Related Topics

Open Document