Before starting my research for the debate, I stopped to think to myself what forgiving student loan debt meant to me. I thought about how forgiving a student’s loan would affect me and if it is a good idea or not. The words “forgiving student loan debt” was logical to me but what came with the debt being forgiven I had thought about. Nobody would turn down having their debt gone but maybe they would be against it if it weren’t their debt being taken away. For the first debate in class I was assigned the pros side to forgiving student loans. I first started off by thinking if I thought this would be a good thing and why or why not. Next I researched the article itself by Kayla Webley. The negatives did outweigh the positives to this idea of student loan forgiveness, which didn’t help me with the first debate. On the other hand, there were a few points that Webley pointed out that were positive. Webley wrote this article to show her side of the idea. I could tell throughout the article that she was against the idea of student loan forgiveness. Webley would use different people’s standings on the situation to back up her opinion. In Webley’s article, she includes pieces of information that she had found to back up her own article. The links are included …show more content…
These taxpayers could be people who have already paid their debt off. That would be completely unfair. It would also be unfair for someone who didn’t go to college because of money reasons to then later have to pay taxes on someone’s student loans being forgiven (Many of section, para. 9). This seemed just wrong in my opinion. I would not want to make someone else have to pay for something I should’ve paid for myself. I would also not believe that forgiving student loan debt would help to economy as quick as they