ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Hate Speech

1758 Words8 Pages

The Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules 2011, functioning in addition to the Act, arguments the capacity of the Indian Government to proscribe ‘hate speech’. It is worth noting that disparate existing ‘hate speech’ provisions, they explicitly prohibit the ‘hosting, display, uploading, modification, publication, transmission, updating, or sharing’ of any information which, as per clause 3(2)(b) of the Rules, is ‘blasphemous’; such judicious reference to ‘blasphemy’ is unprecedented.
In addition, clause 3(2)(b) of the Rules proscribes the dissemination of material which is ‘racially [or] racially objectionable’, or ‘otherwise unlawful in any manner whatsoever’, while clause 3(2)(i) prohibits material which ‘threatens the …show more content…

Hate speech is against the mandate of a fundamental right which is freedom of expression. Freedom of expression has five broad special purposes to serve:
 It helps an individual to attain self-fulfillment.
 It assists in discovering of truth.
 It strengthens the capacity of an individual in participating in decision making.
 It provides a mechanism by which it would be possible to establish reasonable balance between stability and social change.
 All members of the society would be able to form their own beliefs and communicate them freely to others.
Hate speech hinders these purposes. Not all contemporary instances of hate speech are alike. Any evaluation of whether, how, or how much, hate speech ought to be prohibited. It must therefore account for certain key variables, namely , who and what are involved and where, when and under what circumstances these cases arise. They also make a difference in terms of whether or not it should be prohibited. As it, anywhere may make a difference depending on the country, society or culture involved, which may justify flatly prohibiting all Nazi propaganda in Germany but not in the United States may also matter within the same country or society. Thus, hate speech in an intracommunal setting may in some cases be less dangerous than if uttered in an intercommoned setting. Without minimizing the dangers of hate speech, it seems plausible …show more content…

Our society has always encouraged the progression of knowledge with societal peace. Ethical stances on such material should not be formed by the mere existence of its controversy, but rather through individual study and personal conclusion as a person himself is a true judge. Ensuring prompt and effective investigation and prosecution of hate crimes and ensuring that bias motives are taken into consideration and throughout criminal proceedings. It is advisable in this type of situation that a person should use his own intellect and take his own decision whatever he finds right. Individual decisions are important because a society is made only by a group of these individual. If they are right then there is no chance of chaos in society due to these hate speeches and ultimate aim of the state which is to have peace in the society is fulfilled at the end

Show More
Related
549 Words | 3 Pages

James Keegstra was a high school teacher in Alberta, who lost his teaching license in 1984. Keegstra taught his students that the Holocaust was made up by the Jews to receive sympathy from society. Therefore, Keegstra was accused of being discriminatory towards the Jewish community. Section 319(2) of the criminal code prohibits hate propaganda, not including in private conversations. Subsection 2(b) of the Charter protects hate propaganda because it is a form of expression.

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Which begs the question; what makes hate speech hateful? To support Gladwell's idea that there are certain requirements for

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

In Jonathan Rauch’s article In Defense of Prejudice, Rauch gives a compelling argument as to why people prejudicial talk should not be diminished. In agreement with Salman Rushdie: "without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist,” Rauch believes society should not be seeking ways to end this type of speech. This is because taking it away would cause a regression in society’s development. Instead, all should come to terms with the idea that with freedom of speech; comes unwanted opinions. I strongly agree with the viewpoint Jonathan Rauch presented in his article; it is upon all of us to stop pointing fingers and calling each other bigots because they do not fit into our molds of right and wrong.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

The 1st Amendment guarantees the individual the freedom of religion, speech, press, to assemble, and to petition the government. Freedom of speech allows for people to partake in the democratic process by allowing them to speak their beliefs and political ideals. Without the freedom, there couldn’t be a democracy (Ginsberg, 2014). Though there are different forms of speech, some that are protected and some that are not. There are different ways of looking at the 1st Amendment.

Read More
323 Words | 2 Pages

According to the congress, a hate crime is a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender's bias against a race, religion, disability, ethnic origin or sexual orientation.” (2015, January 07). Hate Crime—Overview. FBI. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Hate speech includes, but is not limited to, gesture, conduct, writing, or verbal communication that might encourage discriminatory behavior to a protected individual or group of individuals. Many universities are committed to creating an atmosphere of equal opportunity that harbors talent, creativity and ingenuity. Speech codes are not only justifiable, but are also essential to campuses because they do not allow the use of hate speech. One who is for the use of speech codes on campuses may argue alongside Lawrence in saying that it is unacceptable to use hate speech in any scenario or environment because it suppresses the voices of minorities. Lawrence presents the idea that “the subordinate victims of fighting words are silenced by their relatively powerless position in society.”

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Charles Lawrence in his racist speech tries to convince that racist speech needs to be regulated. He argues that hate speech is intolerable in the United States because it represents discrimination which Everyone defines hate speech differently. I define hate speech as anything that incites aggression regarding one person or a group of people. Now a day’s people uses free speech as a defense for saying anything but discriminating someone is not free speech.

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

While yes, it would be difficult to enact a law limiting hateful speech, and such a plan would initially meet with heavy opposition, it is not impossible to protect citizens of our country from violence and the normalization of violent

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

Hate crime What distinguishes a hate crime from other crimes is an underlying motivation based on the victim’s group membership. There has been much debate over the constitutionality of hate crime laws and which groups (if any) should be protected by such legislation. Those against hate crime laws argue that it is a violation of First Amendment protections of free, association, and freedom of thought. The Supreme Court confirmed that freedom of thought is implied by the First Amendment in R.A.V. v. St. Paul which those against hate crime laws argue makes such laws unconstitutional.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

In the story To Kill a Mockingbird, class, gender, and race determines power. Being set in a racist, backwater town, where the whites and blacks are separated, these are what factors must be looked at when determining the power of Mayella Ewell. Mayella Ewell has power, although it may not always be easy to at first glance, she does have power despite her disadvantages. Mayella is poor, white and a woman, but nothing about those facts makes her any less powerful, even being poor, she still gets treated like a lady. A way of showing this is during the trial, Atticus refers to Mayella as “Ma’am”, where as Tom Robinson is called, “boy” by his cross examiner(DBQ Mayella 17), in this case being a woman gives her some power.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

The ability to speak freely is written in the bill of rights and has been preserved for decades, but when free speech turns into hate speech it brings up the widely deliberated issue about banning hate speech. There are many different perspectives on the issue of hate speech. Author of Hate Speech is Free Speech, Gov. Dean and Law professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, applies a strong historical perspective on the situation arguing that people are “constitutionally illiter[ate]” when they make the claim that hate speech is not part of the First Amendment. Believing that it is impossible to ban hate speech because everyone will always disagree with any idea, Reynolds focuses on the problems with banning hate speech and what might happen if hate

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

We can’t misuse the freedom of speech, saying words that can cause serious harm (bullying). This form of speech will cause depression, suicide, and stunted social development. When freedom of speech hurts others, then it is not just an opinion anymore; it is a form of hate

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Starting with pro, I believe that freedom of speech allows people to enable the right to express about personal thoughts, such as expressing your personal opinion on a political debate, or expressing your opinion in a public or campus riot. According to Visionlaunch.com, they state that “this concept allows a person to have the freedom of expressing their public opinion and their thoughts, without the worry of getting fines or jail time even if people don’t agree with you”. How would this impact or affect the people around the world? Well, this would not impact anybody because expressing your opinion on a

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

The time in which we live is the age of communication and the speech or talking one of the important ways of communication and expression. There are different types of Speech and communicate, one of them hate speech. Hate speech means attacking a person or group based on different basis such as gander, religion, race, ethnic origin or nationality and disability. In the other hand, some of human rights treaties agree with freedom of speech or freedom of expression it could offend or disturb others so government of Countries placed laws of hate speech to avoid harms, troubles and problems. Over years Hate speech law became one of the most known laws in international law.

Read More
2363 Words | 10 Pages

1.0 INTRODUCTION In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), freedom of speech falls under the Article 19 which is the freedom of opinion and expression. It protects one’s freedom ‘to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers’ (The United Nations, 1948). Article 19(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) adds that the freedom of expression could be ‘either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice’. Besides being an individual’s fundamental liberty of expression, Santa Clara University School of Law Professor Russell W. Galloway (1991) states that free speech is the ‘matrix of all other freedoms’.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Hate Speech

Related Topics

Open Document