ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Iranian Embargo

900 Words4 Pages

United States has had an embargo on Iran for isolating it, but right now there are debates on whether this these sanctions should be lift in order to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Beginning in 2006, the U.S. and EU have incrementally tightened sanctions against Iran’s nuclear, missile, energy, shipping, transportation, insurance, and financial sectors. These sanctions have throttled Iran’s economic growth, contributing to two years of recession, significantly decreased oil revenues, and runaway inflation. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) states, “Iran is one of the world's leading state sponsors of terrorism through its financial and operational support for groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and others. Iran could potentially share …show more content…

Economically, Iran is known for its impact on oil. “Sanctions have created pressure on Iran, but Iran is also a large regional economy with a relatively diversified structure--oil is very important (…) Certainly, the European embargo means Iran has to find customers who are at about half a million barrels of oil a day [to replace loss of European oil sales], and secondly, even when it continues to sell oil, it experiences difficulties in laying its hand on the proceeds of the sale of oil because of the expensive nature of the financial sanctions” (Johnson). The lifting would further isolate Iran from the global economy, but they have already been cautious about this topic. Iran has found new customers, offered discounts to maintain customers, and have entered to transactions of local currencies, like the Rupee in India; all this reduces the range of imports that Iran can get from trading partners, but gives them economic safety. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Iran has the world's fourth-largest proven crude oil reserves. “Oil is key for Iran, and it has gotten around the sanctions by using the black market” (Eggan). Accepting the agreement would lower oil costs even

Show More
Related

Summary Of Taken Hostage By David Farber

635 Words | 3 Pages

embassy in Tehran and seized control of the embassy. Farber provides both an international and domestic viewpoint on the crisis, which offers the reader more of an outlook on the situation. Farber’s international viewpoint provides the reader with the look into the origins of the situation and the policies the United States had put in place in Iran. These policies include the part in ousting Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh by the United States, the United States backing of the Shah and the inclination of policy makers to turn their backs to the problem of authoritarianism in Iran, which was causing suffering for the people in the country. These problems began when the United States took interest in the Middle East in the 1970’s because of its oil rich ground.

Read More

Summary Of Taken Hostage By David Farber

479 Words | 2 Pages

In 1980, the Shah died and the militants wanted the hostage deal of Shah standing trial and taking the punishment for his crimes in exchange for the release of the hostages. So now with the Shah passing it was impossible for the Shah to stand trial and be convicted for the said crimes. Leaving the hostages useless to the militants. So its time for a new deal to be made. In exchange for the hostages, the United States would unfreeze the accounts of the Iranian

Read More

Summary Of Hidden Iran By Ray Takeyh

518 Words | 3 Pages

"Hidden Iran" is a book written by Ray Takeyh explaining about the Islamic republic power and paradox that existed. It shows the relationship between Iran and America. The author is an expert in history and politics of Iran wrote this book demystifying the regime of Iranian and shows the fault lines, which explain the behavior of domestic politics. The author critiques the approach of US to Iran since its revolution in 1979 and its failure of change successive administration behavior.

Read More

Ronald Reagan's Decision To End The Hostage Crisis In Iran

448 Words | 2 Pages

Ronald Reagan would win the election of 1980 and one of his major campaign platforms was the promise to end the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The Ayatollah’s supporters were then elected to the Iranian parliament. This meant that there was no reason to hold the hostages, having the Ayatollah in power with his supports in parliament meant that they effectively controlled all aspects of Iranian society. Then Iraq and Iran would become involved in a war. Iranian assets which had been frozen in the United States, were now needed more than ever if they wished to have access to their foreign currencies, without which they risked losing the war and then their country.

Read More

How Did Faulty Foreign Policy Lead To Jimmy Carter Downfall

2363 Words | 10 Pages

This resulted in an operation known as Operation TP-Ajax to be launched by the CIA and British Intelligence Services which aimed to restore Iran politically and overthrow Mossadegh. It was successful and in the summer of 1958 Iran’s political system was re-established, placing the monarchy; Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi back into total power. With help from the Shavok, communists and social democrats were being arrested and overall ruling with a heavy hand. Shah’s government bought a lot of American resources which reduced the country’s GDP hugely, especially between 1976-1978 as shown in figure 4[footnoteRef:11]. As a

Read More

Who Was Jimmy Carter In The Iranian Hostage Crisis

1451 Words | 6 Pages

Iraq also did no longer support Iran. Hostage crisis supporters said Iran was in a “stronger

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Truman And Carter Doctrine

923 Words | 4 Pages

The United States effort to contain communism and stop the Soviet Union from dominating was one of their main objectives. In an effort to protect the American economy, the Americans organized military coups which allowed the overthrow the Prime Minister of Iran- Mohammed Mossadegh who was extremely lenient towards communism. The Americans number one fear at the time was the spread of communism. The Iranian replaced their former president with a radical Islamic dictator, who cooperated with the American people and agreed to provide them with oil. Because the Americans were greatly benefiting from Iran they seemed Ok with the chaos that was occurring in that region.

Read More

Mohammed Reza Pahlavi Research Paper

205 Words | 1 Pages

Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, a member of Iran’s royal family, was reinstated as Shah to the new government created in 1953 by Americans. The shah’s pro-western, secular government allied with the United States, blocked the Communist Russians from Iran. Preventing Russia from gaining access to Iran was an extensive addition to cheap oil relations of the United States. Diplomats used a single method to remain ties to the shah and insured cheap oil. This scheme composed granting any of the shah’s request including American weapons and fighter aircrafts.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis

1304 Words | 6 Pages

Since entering office, President Donald Trump has taken a hostile stance towards Iran, and now threatens to end the era of rapprochement that prevailed during the Obama Administration. This would be a significant mistake that would bode ill for both the United States and Iran. While detractors of President Obama’s policy towards Iran argue that it strengthens the oppressive regime of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, the opposite is actually true. Friendly relations between the United States and Iran undermine the fear mongering rhetoric of Khamenei and his hardliner allies and strengthen the arguments of the reformist coalition in Iran. The success of this more moderate faction of Iranians serves United States’ interests in that it eliminates an

Read More

Phyllis Shlafly Case

1520 Words | 7 Pages

Petroleum is a natural resource abundant in Middle Eastern countries which became imperative to the U.S. and England. England and the British Petroleum (BP) had control over the oil fields in Iran and did not distribute the benefits among the people. In 1940s, popular politician, Mosaddegh led a strike in favor of the poor Iranians. In 1951, Mosaddegh was appointed as Prime Minister of Iran and attempted to nationalize the oil fields. In 1953, the British and U.S. spy agencies released Operation Ajax on the Iranian government.

Read More

Us-Iran Relations During 1963-89

1358 Words | 6 Pages

US-Iranian relations during 1963-89 were a crucial part of regional developments as a result of Iran’s geopolitical importance in the Middle East as a resource-rich regional power. After the re-establishment of the autocratic Pahlavi monarchy in 1953, the Shah relied on US and domestic support for the maintenance of his regime. Subsequently, in the 1960s and 70s, U.S. support faltered, and the economy and the reforms of the White Revolution failed due to corruption and inept government policy. As a consequence came the ascendancy of Ayatollah Khomeini and the subsequent Iranian hostage crisis, which strained US-Iranian relations and led to the severance of US-Iran relations and US support of Iraq in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war. This led to sanctions

Read More

Essay On Western Imperialism

569 Words | 3 Pages

It emphasized that “access to Persian Gulf oil and [the] security of key friendly states in the area are vital to U.S. national security,” and specified that the United States would not hesitate to use “military force” to “defend its vital interests in the region” (“Seeking Stability”). The United States’ desire for Persian oil at all costs was essentially the driving force for imperial ventures in 1928. The future of Western dependence on Middle Eastern oil was sealed in 1908, when Britain decided to switch from a coal-powered navy in the Mediterranean to protect its oil interests in the Middle East. This critical change marked the beginning of an era of Western oil imperialism - a “collaborative effort between industrial governments and oil companies to control the oil resources of various less advanced countries” (“Seeking Stability”). Evidently, Great Britain feared other powers would attempt controlling oil in the Middle East leading to its acquisition of Persia.

Read More

Movie Analysis Of The Movie Argo

787 Words | 4 Pages

At the beginning of the film, there is a preface, a short video with narration that offers some context to the audience. This opening actually questions American foreign policy as it is explained that this whole crisis was provoked by Americans themselves. This is a very clever strategy used by filmmakers in order to give the impression to the audience that the representations in the film are complex. As already mentioned, Evelyn Alsultany calls it simplified complex representation (Arabs 21). Arabs, in this case Iranians, are still depicted as uncivilised and dangerous people in the rest of the film, and their portrayal is actually one-dimensional.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Banning The Atomic Bomb

862 Words | 4 Pages

Proliferation groups are trying to get the US to lead the way and destroying and disarming their atomic bombs in hopes that other countries will follow. Forster proposes these ideas in his own words. "The goal of the treaty is to "prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament."(Forster). The US cannot just say disarm your weapons and not do the same themselves. The US needs to take charge and start things themselves.

Read More

Beef Jerky Research Paper

812 Words | 4 Pages

Beef jerky is believed to have originated in South America in the early 1800s or earlier. Ancestors of the Inca Empire made a product similar to beef jerky, using the meat from game animals such as deer, elk and buffalo. They salted strips of meat and allowed them to dry in the sun or over hot coals for long periods of time. This method of drying allowed the natives an excellent source of food when fresh meat was not available. The dried meat, if properly stored, could be kept for very long periods of time.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Iranian Embargo

Related Topics

Open Document