ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Judicial Branch

1113 Words5 Pages

The 3 Branches

All of the branches have their pros and cons with what they are allowed to do concerning all of them. With there being 3 branches with all the power split up, not one branch overpowers the others. Checks and balances are the main reason for the balance among branches. With this system in effect, it causes strengths and weaknesses in all of the branches to even the responsibilities of what they are and isn't allowed to do. Each branch does have its special perks that can make one better than the other depending on what you see best. I believe the legislative branch is the best because they have the power to create laws and to influence the decisions of the other branches.

The Legislative Branch is where everything starts from …show more content…

The Judicial branch consists of the U.S. Supreme Court and the Federal Judicial Center. This branch deals a lot with disputes including federal, civil, and state disputes. The U.S. The Supreme Court is the higher court a case can be taken to in the US. The Supreme Court website states, “The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under the law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution (About the Supreme Court). One of the biggest strengths of the Judicial branch is the power of judicial review. Judicial review is where if they see a law as unconstitutional they can nullify it. This power also grants them the ability to declare any act from the Legislative or Executive branch a violation of the Constitution. Although they have some strong powers they are not able to make any laws, and that's the biggest downside. They are also only allowed to act upon cases brought before the supreme court. But the judicial branch has lots of checks and balances to keep the court system in check. The president is the main one who keeps the judicial branch in check since he has the power to nominate new judges. The legislative branch has the power to disapprove the nominations for the supreme court so they influence who goes on the stands. The judicial branch also checks other branches by declaring something

Show More
Related
310 Words | 2 Pages

The judicial review strengthens the constitutional principle of checks and balances. In the 1789 judiciary act and Judiciary act of 1801 had the right to allow the writs of mandamus. Meaning that they court should have power and including the fact that they are forced to do something. John Marshall weakened the power of the supreme court by getting rid of the power. However he did improve the branch by creating the judicial review.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

The lLegislative Branch has a good amount of power over the other two branches of our

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

In addition, James Madison stated the idea of Checks and Balances and what it will do to the government, “...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other... The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This statement means that each branch should have a different power, so they wouldn’t have any constitutional control over each other. That makes each branch check on the other branches to make sure they are doing everything correctly. One way that the Judicial Branch can check on the Legislative Branch is that when Congress creates laws, the Court can declare laws unconstitutional because some laws might not be a good idea for the people of the country, so the Judicial has the power to take away the possible law.

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

The three different branches of government helped guard against tyranny. They helped guard against tyranny because each branch has different people in it and that means that not all of the same people are making the laws and enforcing them. Now they have multiple people creating the laws which decreases any chance of tyranny. With the three different branches of government comes the sharing of power which also helps guard against tyranny. If they all can come together and share all of the power than we can have a government successfully without having any problems with tyranny.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

The Executive branch executes laws and is the president. The Judicial branch judges laws and is the Supreme Court. The Legislative branch creates laws and is the House of Representatives and Senate. James Madison said in Federalist Paper #47 Document B, “the accumulation of all powers...in the same hands...may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This helps protect from tyranny because the Separation of Powers prevents all power from being in the same hands.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

This branch would be responsible for enforcing the laws. The Judicial branch would contain the courts, including the nine justices who make up the highest court (the Supreme Court). According to the Constitution, "[t]he judicial Power of the United

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

The three branches were established by the Constitution and divided into executive, legislative, and judicial. The executive branch consists of the president and his cabinet, the legislative branch consists of Congress, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, and the judicial branch consists of the Supreme court and other federal courts. Focusing on the judicial branch, the Constitution has established the Supreme Court as the only court to make decisions of national importance. One strength of this branch is that it holds the power to provide equal justice and determine if the laws passed by Congress are constitutional through appeals, trials, and review. “Put simply, for federal theorists judicial supremacy exists because it must:

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The main purpose of a judicial branch per Hamilton is to "declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void", meaning to rule any laws or policies not in accordance with the Constitution, unconstitutional. He also states that they serve a purpose as an intermediate body between the people and the legislative branch, to check the legislature's

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

The judicial branch is the branch of government that interprets and applies laws to the states and includes the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, Adams Judicial Appointments, and the Marbury v. Madison final decision all supported

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

In addition, the executive branch was responsible for enforcing or vetoing laws passed by Congress (in addition to its other powers). As for the judiciary, it is responsible for interpreting federal laws and the constitution and for overseeing the decisions made by the federal and state courts. Before when it was unable to address economic and boundary disputes, the judiciary under the constitution was able to address a wide range conflicts. Above all, these three branches of government share equal power to prevent one form of government from becoming too

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court, which has the right to solve any dispute between national and regional

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

The executive branch includes “a President of the United States.” and the judicial branch included” judges, both of the supreme and the inferior courts” (Constitution).It divides the power between all the branches equally making sure one group doesn't have all the power. Which the Constitution does to not make one group not have all of the power in the branches. The Constitution uses checks and balances to guard against tyranny. “... the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner so that they may be a check on the other….”

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

The Supreme court can over power the Legislative branch by declaring laws unconstitutional. This is all stated in (Doc B,C). This is how the branches have equal powers over each other and how not just one branch has too much power of the other

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

“Good Morning dear classmates and teacher, I will be delivering a speech explaining why the US Judicial Branch is Good but Far from Perfect…” Thanks to the principle of Separation of Powers, the U.S. government is divided into three branches, each responsible for accomplishing specific tasks. “The judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws, how to apply them to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution or not. It is said that The Constitution of the United States is the highest law of our Nation. The U.S. Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States, is part of the Judicial Branch.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

The executive branch can check the laws congress wants to pass and can veto them if he disagrees. The Legislative branch can check the executive by accepting the already vetoed law and can impeach or fire the president out of office. The Justice Branch can make sure peoples rights and liberties are being followed and check if the laws follow the constitution's rules. In the text, it says “To further limit government power the framers provided for separation of powers the constitution separates the government into three branches Congress of the legislative branch makes the laws. The executive branch headed by the president carries out laws.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Judicial Branch

Related Topics

Open Document