ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Pamela Paul

322 Words2 Pages
This issue explored the opposing views as to whether or not pornography is harmful. Pamela Paul argues the pro side and Megan Andelloux argues the con. Paul focuses on the effects that pornography can have can have on relationships and how pornography changes an individual’s outlook on society. Specifically she keys in on men, using examples of how relationships have been ruined due to man’s addiction to pornography. On the opposing side Andelloux believes that porn is a way for individuals to explore desires that they are unwilling or unable to experience in life. She also describes poor as the safest of sex, noting that there is “no risk of STI transmission, no risk of an unwanted pregnancy, no risk of feeling disappointed by the way performed,
Open Document