ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

737 Words3 Pages

Plea Bargaining Plea bargaining is the negotiations between prosecutors and defense lawyers on how to resolve criminal charges (Fagin pg.177). The defendant carries the guilty plea in return for a reduction sentence or dismissal of some charges. Estimates state that 97% of federal cases have used this method without ever going to trial (Fagin pg.177). Once all sides agree, the actual sentencing is completely up to the judge, not the lawyers. The judge is not bound to follow the prosecution’s recommendation. There are generally three types of plea bargains used in the justice system. Charge bargaining, the most common form of plea bargaining, sentence bargaining and fact bargaining (Plea Bargains: In Depth,2017). Plea bargaining can have its …show more content…

If there wasn't any plea bargaining, courts would be overcrowded and forced to be shut down. It is an advantage for the defense since it will be less work required on their part (Tapscott, 2017). Because plea bargains are much quicker and require less work, it keeps the cases moving and courtrooms unclogged. This works for both prosecutor and defendant since the case would close quickly allowing them to move on to bigger, serious cases. The benefit of agreeing to a plea bargain is that it de clogs the courts and the overcrowded jails. Another plea bargaining advantage is that it helps prosecutors deal with caseloads. The plea bargains can help the court and state manage the caseloads. Fewer trials means that the prosecutors can more effectively prosecute the most serious cases (Tapscott, 2017). Once a plea bargain is in place, the defendants save time and money by not having to defend themselves at trial. They avoid long sentencing by offering specific information or even pleading guilty. A third advantage of plea bargain is that it prevents the case from getting worse. If …show more content…

Pleading guilty even when innocent has been done in fear that one can be found guilty by a jury in trial. This crime is then added to your criminal record, which can not be erased. It can affect where you work or even live and your right to vote is taken. Once you are a convicted felon, it is harder to find a job. Also once they agree to plea guilty, there will not be an opportunity for an appeal later on in the future. A second disadvantage is that some may say that plea bargaining is unconstitutional since every American citizen has the right to trial by jury (Tapscott, 2017). According to those who oppose plea bargains, there is nothing free or fair about the choice that the plea bargains present (Klau,2013). Adding that defendants are asked to make the choice under pressure because of the possible charges and prison time they face if they don’t accept the plea bargain(Klau,2013). With this in mind, plea bargain can result into unjust sentencing for the

Show More
Related
550 Words | 3 Pages

The author looks at the time period that the three were released and discusses the reason for their release, which is Alford plea. In this case, the defendant is voluntarily forced to plead guilty while still proclaiming his or her innocence. The author also looks at the evidence and ends up concluding that that there was little evidence that linked the defendants to the murder. In addition, the author criticizes the state’s government for forcing the men to plead guilty. Using another case, the author looks into this matter by examining the flaws related to the Alford’s plea.

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

Prosecutors have the power to send offenders away which allows them to make harsh decisions. They offer plea bargains to offenders which often will enable them to do time in prison. Pfaff stated that "as long as prosecutors simply use the tough laws as a bargaining chip, not real punishment, legislators can reap the political benefits of looking tough on crime while avoiding difficult financial decisions" (Pfaff, 2017, P136). Prosecutors offer a plea bargain to get rid of cases quickly and not allow offenders to go to trial because they might receive more prison

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with less than the maximum sentence. For example, the prosecution and the defense may agree to a misdemeanor charge instead of a felony charge or the parties may agree to a sentence of 12 years instead of 20 years if the recommended sentence for that crime is 10-20 years imprisonment.

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

You are most definitely correct Mark. The Three-strike laws are a good way to deter crimes. As stated on the Golden Gate University Law review, the Three-strike law has had a deterrent effect because it reduces felony arrests rates among the class of criminals with 1 strike by 29 to 48 percent (Goodno, 2010, p. 469). Statistically, it seems to somewhat stop repeat offenders. Bill Veeck is known for famously saying, “If you get three strikes, even the best lawyer in the world can’t get you off” (Demakis, 2012, p. 354).

Read More
142 Words | 1 Pages

Plea-bargaining dominates the American criminal justice system by offering a reduced sentence to those who stand accused of a crime in exchange for the accused pleading guilty or to a lesser charge and waiving the right to trial. The problem with plea-bargaining is that it lays a heavy burden on the accused while theoretically reducing the burden carried by prosecutors and the court system. Plea-bargaining has trickled its way into the American criminal justice system disguised as a win-win for accused criminals and prosecutors but has weakened the justice system by allowing prosecutors to score guilty pleas from vulnerable individuals and allowing serious criminal offenders walk on lesser charges. Plea-bargaining severely undermines the criminal

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.

Read More
339 Words | 2 Pages

“ In this control model , the control of criminal behavior is by far the most important function of criminal justice.” (Bohm, Hailey, 2012,p.16.). Defendants are presumed to be guilty upon their arrest and resolving their cases is a major point in this model. Plea deals are used to alleviate the overcrowding in the criminal justice

Read More
1648 Words | 7 Pages

The first and most common plea used is the “guilty” plea. Guilty pleas are used when the defendant agrees to having committed the crime to which he or she has been accused. Guilty pleas are often used if a prosecutor offers a plea bargain to he defendant. If the defendant

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Advantages and Disadvantages of Plea Bargaining Plea bargaining is an agreement used in criminal cases to avoid a lengthy trial. Here, the prosecutor and the defendant work together to agree with each other, instead of taking the litigation to a jury. It often includes things like pleaing to a lesser charge and pleaing guilty in exchange for a lighter sentence. It is highly common in the US, where many cases are settled through plea bargains than by trials.

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the courts are backlogged and many public defenders and judges being overworked, this causes plea bargaining to be used repeatedly. According to Walker et al. (2018), plea bargaining leaves many people no option but to plea guilty even when this is not their best option. This is due to a multitude of reasons but mainly to receive a lesser charge. For example, a felony and little time in jail may be better than risking multiple felonies and an excessive amount of time in jail.

Read More
245 Words | 1 Pages

What is the “Due Process?” The due process is a fair Treatment through the normal Judicial system, especially as a citizen’s entitlement It respect all legal rights that are balances the power of law of land and protects the individual person. What does it do?

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

In cases of a more serious nature which are identified as felonies, the defendant will appear at a hearing for the purpose of determining whether they will be released or will be required to have a more formal hearing known as a preliminary hearing. During the preliminary hearing, the judge will decide if enough probable cause exists for the defendant to be bound over for grand jury indictment or arraignment depending on the state in which the proceedings are being conducted. The defendant will then appear at their arraignment hearing in order to enter their plea of guilty or not guilty. In the case of a guilty plea, they may be offered an opportunity to plea bargain. In this phase, they will be provided an opportunity to plead guilty

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that restorative justice could be a good idea for the United States if it is used correctly. I think that if restorative justice is used correctly, it could really benefit everyone involved: the victim, offender, family, and the community. Some of the restorative justice ways can also help victims move past what has happened to them and live a more normal life again. I think restorative justice would also benefit the United States because it can help the offender have a better life after. I think that restorative justice needs to be used correctly because if it is not done right it could actually cause more harm.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

The process of a criminal trial is a multifaceted occurrence that has the potential to follow a variety of routes. A courtroom observed in Camrose on October 14, 2015 modelled the procedure of a criminal trial precisely. Criminal trials occur after the following conditions are met: a crime is committed, the police intervene and take the necessary action required to prevent further offenses, and the offender has been issued a summons to court. At this point, lawyers may attempt to convince the offender to accept a plea bargain. A plea bargain urges the miscreant to plead guilty in order to save money and time, to spare a victim from testifying, and to help the offender assume responsibility.

Read More
9957 Words | 40 Pages

According to Alkon (2014:12): Plea bargaining is based on informal negotiations. For plea bargaining to function, prosecutors need to have the discretion to decide when to offer plea bargains and what the offer should include. This can lead to different legal outcomes for otherwise similarly situated defendants. Some variation in sentencing is inevitable, even where all parties have followed the law and acted in good faith in negotiating pleas. However, plea bargaining can be used to cover disparate sentencing due to systemic problems like political interference in the legal system or corruption.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

Open Document