ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

9957 Words40 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Overcrowed prisons in the criminal justice system in america

INTRODUCTION
Criminal justice systems around the world have been facing overwhelming caseloads, and there have been ever-increasing pressure to handle them. These pressures are more manifest serious in countries with limited resources and fragile political environments. The kind of overload experienced as a result of overloaded criminal justice system in Nigeria is making it difficult, if not impossible, to try every accused person on time. Countries are increasingly searching for alternative processes to handle criminal cases beyond traditional formal trials. To this end, plea bargaining is being considered as a possible solution to problems of backlogs of cases, long periods of pretrial detention, and other human rights abuses resulting from the poor functioning of Nigeria’s criminal justice system. Hopefully, plea bargaining may help in alleviating this kind of challenges in the legal system. However, in countries that have not previously used plea bargains, this kind of reform which is new in our legal system should be carefully taken into consideration in the overall context of the existing criminal …show more content…

According to Alkon (2014:12):
Plea bargaining is based on informal negotiations. For plea bargaining to function, prosecutors need to have the discretion to decide when to offer plea bargains and what the offer should include. This can lead to different legal outcomes for otherwise similarly situated defendants. Some variation in sentencing is inevitable, even where all parties have followed the law and acted in good faith in negotiating pleas. However, plea bargaining can be used to cover disparate sentencing due to systemic problems like political interference in the legal system or corruption.

THEORETICAL

Show More
Related
619 Words | 3 Pages

In today's era, when a criminal is charged for various crimes their given a shortcut to justice by simply accepting a plea deal. In this case, Larry Servedio faces multiple felonies: first-degree kidnapping, first-degree rape, third-degree rape, third-degree criminal sexual act, third-degree criminal mischief, criminal impersonation, second-degree grand larceny, and second-degree strangulation. Servedio was also indicted for several misdemeanor charges: first-degree harassment, second-degree aggravated harassment, second-degree menacing and torturing and injuring an animal. If Mr. Servedio goes to trial and is able to prove his innocence of the charges pressed against him, then he is a free man and all charges get dropped. Yet, if Mr. Servedio

Read More
631 Words | 3 Pages

Defendants asked for leniency and the prosecutor offers a deal and they take it because they are tired of sitting in jail, but few realize that by taking

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

Prosecutors have the power to send offenders away which allows them to make harsh decisions. They offer plea bargains to offenders which often will enable them to do time in prison. Pfaff stated that "as long as prosecutors simply use the tough laws as a bargaining chip, not real punishment, legislators can reap the political benefits of looking tough on crime while avoiding difficult financial decisions" (Pfaff, 2017, P136). Prosecutors offer a plea bargain to get rid of cases quickly and not allow offenders to go to trial because they might receive more prison

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with less than the maximum sentence. For example, the prosecution and the defense may agree to a misdemeanor charge instead of a felony charge or the parties may agree to a sentence of 12 years instead of 20 years if the recommended sentence for that crime is 10-20 years imprisonment.

Read More
1308 Words | 6 Pages

Marcus J. Paulus 2/14/2018 Plea Paper Plea Paper          The plea bargain is necessary part of our justice system. This is because of the vast number of cases our justice system has to deal with each year it would be almost impossible to take all these cases to court each year. Plea bargains give people the chance to reduced there sentence by admitting they committed the crime or a less crime in order for the prosecutor to get a guilty verdict.          The plea bargain process is supposed to be introduced to the discussion but they prosecutor and not the defendant.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Plea bargains are negotiations between the prosecutor and the criminal defendant. In this negotiation, the criminal defendant consents to pleading guilty. When the criminal defendant takes the guilty plea, he or she is able receive reductions in their charges or sentences. There are pros and cons of plea bargains, but these bargains can be doing more harm than good. Plea bargaining is a simple process but can have long term repercussions.

Read More
1423 Words | 6 Pages

The courts have made few promises in which the prosecutor are required to keep the assurance of the agreement once it has been reached. the agreement should make sure that the defendants are aware of the consequences and that the pleas are made of ones own free will. Because it is less expensive and time consuming than a full scale trial, especially a jury trial, prosecutors can prosecute more people, be more productive in processing cases, and more effective in obtaining convictions through a guilty plea. Based on this efficient, “assembly line” type of justice system, the government can add more crimes to the criminal code so that the citizens’ life is even more controlled and regulated. Since pleading guilty eliminates the jury that would be impaneled for a full scale trial, judges, but especially prosecutors, gain much greater power over the conduct of the case, more control over the outcome of criminal cases, and are therefore more able to make defendants “offers that they cannot

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

Moreover, once the detainees agree to the plea guilty, they give up their right to contest or appeal their sentence and brings finality to each case. In that situation, the become legally guilty since the defendant is “guilty as charged” (The Courts, 2013, p. 151). The method of plea bargaining streamlines and reduces the time needed for each case, thus, creating a mechanism for achieving efficiency. Under the crime control model, it is important to have finality mainly because it allows cases to be disposed of quickly and it makes sure that there will be a deterrent

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

In the United States court system, many criminal cases are not resolved in a timely manner. One of the more common ways in which many cases are resolved quickly is through plea bargaining. Plea bargaining is defined as an agreement between defense attorneys and prosecutors. (Spohn & Hemmens, 2012) Alschuler (1979) describes plea bargaining as the self-conviction act of a defendant. Today, approximately ninety percent of defendants plead guilty because of plea bargaining.

Read More
352 Words | 2 Pages

• Plea-bargaining weakens the criminal justice system with the concept that if all cases went to trial the court system would be unable to support the workload. This is a factor that can be disputed by jurisdictions that have ban plea bargaining and continued to operate appropriately. Plea-bargaining is known as the agreement in a criminal court proceeding that is made between a defendant and a prosecutor. Plea bargains typically involve a lesser sentence in return for an omission of wrongdoing. Plea bargains do not forsake the criminal justice system, however they do allow for a speedy exit strategy for prosecutors.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

Plea Bargaining Paper Plea bargaining is defined as an agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant whereby the defendant is allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge rather than risk conviction for a grave crime in order to avoid a protracted trial or to win the defendant's cooperation as a witness ("Plea Bargaining", 2014). A plea bargain can make a substantial difference in the sentencing outcome of a defendant. The prosecution uses this type of bargaining for leverage against the defendant. This means the defendant can be offered to give a testimony of the events that can eventually lead to a charge and conviction of a higher profiled case.

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

The United States criminal justice system is riddled with cases of many varieties. Some have obvious outcomes while others warrant more detailed analysis. However, some cases go beyond the court into other courts, where they are decided, such as Jackson versus Hobbs in 2012. The courts try to lighten the load of cases they have by offering plea bargaining, an agreement among a defendant and a prosecutor in which the defendant pleads guilty to a charge that is less severe than what he or she is initially charged for in the hopes that clemency will be administered. Sometimes, however, people accused of a crime are completely innocent, and it is not until technology is released, such as DNA testing, decades later that these people are proved to

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the courts are backlogged and many public defenders and judges being overworked, this causes plea bargaining to be used repeatedly. According to Walker et al. (2018), plea bargaining leaves many people no option but to plea guilty even when this is not their best option. This is due to a multitude of reasons but mainly to receive a lesser charge. For example, a felony and little time in jail may be better than risking multiple felonies and an excessive amount of time in jail.

Read More
4944 Words | 20 Pages

Critically evaluate the main objectives of the sanctions of criminal courts and then appraise their effectiveness with particular reference to prison sentences and consider whether alternative forms of punishment might be more appropriate. Introduction The most basic tenets of organized societies are sanctions, which are imposed on individuals who go against the norms and values that have been put in place by their society. Throughout human history, there have developed many forms of sanctions with a significant number of societies seeking means to ensure that there are deterrents to those who have either committed crimes or have the potential of doing so. Among the most common types of punishments that were a basic part of the system of sanctions

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

Related Topics

Open Document