Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

628 Words3 Pages

A plea-bargaining is when a prosecutor offers a reduced charge or decrease the number of charge. The defendant come to an agreement with the prosecutor to plea guilty to the sentence they are on trial. The defendant pleads guilty to the crime they are being changed with in order to avoid a trail and avoid more severe sentence. Plea bargaining consents of a judge that authorize the tail which accepts or denies the defendants guilty plea. A defense attorney is who advocates for the defendant to protect the right of the individual. The defense attorney communicates with defendant about plea-bargaining, and assistance the defendant receives the correct plea-bargaining. The prosecutor is an individual who represents the government in a criminal or civil …show more content…

Also local government can profit in having individuals of the community agree to a plea-bargaining’s, since the defendant agreed he/she does not have to attend a trail, but will receive a reduced sentencing in prison or predation. When a defendant chooses the probation agreement the individual has to pay court frees, and probation that assistance the local governments. There are also cons to agreeing to a plea bargains defendants usually agree to plea bargains when they are innocent. Defendants take plea bargains for many reasons they do not want to say in jail over night, they have a families, and a huge reason because the attorney convince clients to agree to a plea. Attorneys try to find the best outcome for their client and sometimes chosen to plea guilty is the best out come for the defendant. When a defendant choose in having trail, but the attorney does not feel comfortable that her/she can win the case it can have an impact on the defendant if found guilty they can receives the maximum