Individuals who argue for the privatization of prisons say the government has the power to delegate the control and administration of punishments to private firms and contractors. They believe that it is cost effective since it relieves the government of the burden of operating the profits. The American Civil Liberties Union claims that private companies are likely to put their welfare and interest ahead of the sake of justice (Hallett, 2006).
In my opinion, most firms are concerned about their profits and not the rehabilitative services it does to the prisoners. I am concerned by the firms demand for the benefits will put state and city officials and thus, interfere with due process. It is, therefore, impossible for the profit motive to be
…show more content…
However, corporations required the government to guarantee that there would be enough prisoners to ensure that the venture was profitable (Dolovich, 2005). In my opinion, the states should need large prison organizations to invest mostly in school programs and early childhood education similar to the lottery. Opponents of privatization of prisons fear that the profit motive could drive local judges to deny the due process to the juvenile offenders in the country (Hallett, 2006).
Privatization of prisons was early seen as a solution to the overcrowding of prisons in the state. With increased private prisons than schools under construction, the firms are playing a significant role in the continued prevailing incarceration rates. There are various factors of private prisons and profit motive is only one aspect (Dolovich, 2005).
The ethics of private entities benefiting from housing convicted
…show more content…
Both sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences aim at minimizing the offences with high-rated individuals in a nation. Also, they are both enacted by the Congress to enhance security in the country by punishing the offenders who may be a threat to the nation by promoting drug abuse which is illegal (Bowman III, 2013).
Federal sentencing guidelines refer to the discretionary measures intended to create both professionalism and uniformity in sentencing for individuals convicted of federal crimes. In contrast, mandatory minimum sentences involve a minimum sentence to a convicted person where a judge has no room for discretion (Ulmer, Kurlychek& Kramer, 2007).
Sentencing guidelines target offenders with high-rated penalties, and it ensures that the sovereignty of the punishment relates to the culpability of the offender and seriousness of the crime. This affects the offenders of federal drug crimes such as cocaine and other drugs. Sentencing guidelines involve the procedures used to convict the offender while the mandatory minimum penalty is the charge posted on the offender (Bowman III,