The given source proposes initiative measure No.594 regarding background checks for sales and transfer of guns. Initiative measure No.594 consists of three main part with its subparts. It includes: explanatory statement proclaiming the current law regarding gun distribution and its foreseen consequences that will apply to the current law if the measure is approved; fiscal impact statement including general assumptions, state revenue assumptions, state revenues, state expenditure assumptions, state expenditures, local government revenue assumptions, local government revenues, local government expenditure assumptions, local government expenditures; arguments against and arguments for measure No.594 coming into force. The main controversy of the document is a wobbly balance between a
Nowhere in the Constitution does it state that women are citizens. Women have never been legally declared persons in this country, not by the Founding Fathers, not by the Constitution, not by the Supreme Court. The Fifteenth Amendment guarantees to right to vote to all U.S. citizens, whatever their race, whether they had been born free or born a slave, but it didn’t include women the right to vote. Women fought along for the abolition of slavery. When the battle was won, black men got the right to vote.
Proposition 54, the Public Display of Legislative Bills Initiative, would 1) prohibit California legislators from passing any bill without posting the bill for the public 72 hours beforehand, 2) require that videos of all the state’s public legislative meetings be posted online for twenty years, and 3) allow anyone to record videos of meetings and use them for “any legitimate purpose.” While proponents argue that this initiative is necessary to increase transparency, you should follow the Democratic Party in opposing it because it would unnecessarily slow down the legislative process, discourage bipartisan compromises, and enable misuse of videos in misleading ads. Furthermore, if Proposition 54 fails, you should offer an alternative piece
Bill C-51: A Critical Look Into the Proposed Bill as It Stands. Since the incidents of september 11 2001, most western countries instituted and updated its anti terrorism laws in order to increase national security and have tools that could counter any terrorist activities that could potentially harm a country's citizens at home or abroad. Canada being one of these countries had established Anti terrorism laws that had been sufficient enough to prevent any terrorist plots against canada in the years leading up to 2014. However after the recent events of the shooting at parliament hill, the conservative government has put forth another bill in order to draconian the anti terrorism laws.
The 14th Amendment is the right for those born on American soil to automatically become a citizen. Although there are some who wish to see a revision to the 14th Amendment, citizenship should continue to be based on birth as Chaves states in “The Case for Birthright Citizenship”. The 14th Amendment is seen as outdated by some Americans. The 14th Amendment was created for free slaves.
A constitution is the fundamental law by which a nation or a state is governed and organized. It establishes the framework of government, delegates the powers and duties of governmental bodies, and defines the relationship between the government and their citizens. Texas current constitution was adopted in 1876, and since then Texas voters have approved more than 467 amendments to this document. The word “amendment” is defined as the act or process of changing the words or the meaning of a law or document (constitution). Throughout this essay I will explain the rules for amending the Texas Constitution, the attempts made at constitutional reforms during the 1970s, explain why constitutional reforms were attempted and why it ultimately failed.
There are two distinct sides when it comes to whether or not the Texas constitution should be rewritten. There is the side that favors rewriting the constitution and those who oppose writing a new constitution. Each side has four very strong argument points they like to use when it comes to discussing the Texas Constitution. Those who favor rewriting the constitution say that our current document is unnecessarily long and completely outdated for today’s modern society. This argument holds true when we take into account that “The Texas Constitution is the second longest in the United States”.
Now happening in America, and other developed countries 1% of the population holds large amounts of wealth, and power. A natural rights form of government will certainly have Income inequality. Because the distribution of income among the members of a community will necessarily be unequal, people choose to pursue their own interest. The dispute between Federal, and State government over federally public lands is complicated but the main issue at hand is federal land is protected to preserve the environment, but state governments want control over this land. This dispute deals with classical republicanism favoriting small communities or individual states.
Lautenberg Amendment The Lautenberg Amendment states that if a person is convicted/charged with a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, the person is prohibited to ever own/buy firearms. As a result, the act has impacted people in different ways. In the first place, the act has a positive impact on police officers who respond to domestic violence calls because police officers can be protected from volatile situations where the abuser can harm the police officers and the victim with a firearm. This act also has a negative effect on police officers convicted of domestic violence because police officers cannot longer use/handle/carry firearms.
The amendment process as stated in the Constitution is the process that “An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification.”. There are many pros and cons of the amendment process and I will discuss a few of them in this essay. In my opinion, there are more cons than pros of the amendment process. A con of the amendment process is that there isn’t much room for change as time goes on Better said as the amendments are outdated.
The DREAM Act: a bill that should be passed before the next elections Two senators first introduced the DREAM Act in congress. Senator Dick Durbin of the Democratic Party and senator Orrin Hatch of the Republican Party came together to form a plan and introduce this bill to congress. The Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors. The bill’s purpose was to the grant undocumented immigrants temporary residency and after meeting further qualifications, permanent residency.
One important component in which the upper class rule America is the electoral process. Loose campaign finance regulation, including controversial Supreme Court decisions such as Citizens United v. US and Buckley v. Valeo is a primary cause of the wealthy ruling politics. These two decisions asserted that corporations are not limited in their spending on political candidates. Essentially, the US Supreme Court enabled corporate leaders to buy influence - SuperPAC heads and wealthy businessmen were welcomed to join forces and pour as much money as possible into candidates’ campaigns. The net effect: America’s wealthiest individuals could exert an unmatchable influence on candidates and the electorate while pressing an agenda favoring the upper class.
Angela Davis Once said “Well for one, The 13th Amendment to the constitution of the U.S. which abolished slavery, did not abolish slavery for those convicted of a crime.” Although the amendment was desperately needed it made more problems for the U.S.The thirteenth amendment was about abolishing slavery. Many people had different opinions about this amendment. The amendment affected our nation dramatically. The 13th amendment to the United States Constitution says that, "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Although these rich Americans want the government to handle the issue of taxation they feel posing higher taxes on them is just not fair. They feel they are hard working citizens who spend a great deal of time working at their business. It is through risks that they may have taken that got them to the positions that they got to today. They feel frustrated when people call them greedy because of their wealth because they feel the poor are the greedy people. The poor receive handouts from the government for everything in their lives, and the rich have to finance these projects.
The upper class get better food and products than the working class that is actually helping the country grow. The upper class controls what is given to the lower class and even cuts down on what or how much the lower classes get, “It appeared that
