There are two distinct sides when it comes to whether or not the Texas constitution should be rewritten. There is the side that favors rewriting the constitution and those who oppose writing a new constitution. Each side has four very strong argument points they like to use when it comes to discussing the Texas Constitution. Those who favor rewriting the constitution say that our current document is unnecessarily long and completely outdated for today’s modern society. This argument holds true when we take into account that “The Texas Constitution is the second longest in the United States”. (Champagne and Harpham 91) In addition to the fact that it is unnecessarily long. The Texas constitution is also completely outdated and has been “amended 474 times” …show more content…
“Many people see some desirable features in the Texas Constitution.” (Champagne and Harpham 99) An example of this is that our state constitution “provides more constitutional protections than does the U.S. Constitution”. (Champagne and Harpham 99) Secondly, even though we have a difficult amendment process. We still have managed to pass 474 amendments. Proving that the rules set by our current constitutional amendment process is working just fine. Thus the saying “if it ain't broke, don’t fix it” comes into play. Thirdly, if we allowed for a new constitution to be written for the state of Texas, we the people. Then run the risk of a government trying to give itself to much power and resort back to the era of the “antichrist” E.J. Davis. This exact issue is why we made sure that the constitution of 1876 gave the state government limited power because we feared big government telling us what to do. Finally, there have been many attempts to pass a new constitution in Texas. All, of the proposed constitutions, have failed because the people of Texas love to live by a simple motto “if it ain't broke, don’t fix it”. However, all of these arguments are pointless if we don’t know about our state constitutional