ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Race-Based Affirmative Action Programs

880 Words4 Pages

In 2012, twelve million 18-25 year olds were enrolled in college in the United States (Krogstad par. 2). These students went through extensive processes to earn admittance. Some students, however, may have received an additional advantage due to nothing they could control. This advantage comes through race-based affirmative action programs. Race-based affirmative action programs are outdated and should be discontinued. The programs focus too much on surface differences in race, instead of the more important socioeconomic class issues. Affirmative action was established after the Civil Rights movement in an attempt to racially integrate the workplace and schools. The topic was debated in a Supreme Court case, Regents of the University of California …show more content…

No real benefit to students admitted under affirmative action programs exists, as these students often struggle to meet standards. This idea is part of the mismatch theory (Sander 4). Even though African American students are more likely to start college than white students from similar backgrounds, white students are less likely to drop out, and therefore, more likely to graduate (Sanders 4). Improper matching of students ability with rigor of a school causes this phenomenon. In order to meet racial admission quotas, a school may admit a student who does not necessarily meet all the requirements. These students have the potential to succeed, but quickly become discouraged in the demanding programs (Sander 6). Use of an affirmative action program “tantalizes unprepared students with the promise of a [...] degree and all of the opportunities that it offers,” (Justice Powell qtd. in Chingos par. 3). This tendency of such a program to actually hurt those it attempts to help, means that the program should not be used. When California voters realized this, they passed Proposition 209. Proposition 209, a ban on affirmative action passed in 1996, resulted in improved graduation rates (Chingos par. 5). This increase is due to better matching of students with schools. Since the banning of affirmative action programs in California schools increased graduation rates, other states should follow this example. Although this occurs, some may say that affirmative action programs are still necessary to make up for years of discrimination and unequal

Open Document