ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Regenerative Medicine

974 Words4 Pages

Regenerative medicine has a treatment nowadays for our cells, organs and tissues repair and replacement normal function. Hence demands increase in population for organ transplantation. Research has conducted for recent and alternative therapies. Regenerative Medicine can medicate few cells that were damage due to agedness and congenital defects. In addition stem cell has a regenerative medicine; it regenerates, repairs, and restores functionality. Regenerative medicine has a cure to failing or damage tissues. Stem cell increase years to human life, cure disorder and it also includes make one seems juvenile. As a result this gives leisure to the opening of stem cell clinics to the public in the Philippines. Cellular Therapeutics Center of Makati …show more content…

Destroying these embryos in research would not deprive them of a valuable future. It would be unethical, under whatever circumstances to practice wanted embryos for research. Human animal chimera, an experiment was conducted using the genetic material from human convey to an animal. In addition they argue stem cell research paid minor contemplation to the potential of the umbilical cord. The therapy point out that no medication have been yet produced.
Wanted embryos were valuable for their parents. Respect for the moral value regarding the feelings of the parents. Individual’s cells were duplicated it was another issue concern on cloning embryonic stem cell. This was a therapeutic cloning and begins using same procedure as reproductive cloning. If the cell in the therapy usage embryonic there were impediment of possible negation, having cell from different …show more content…

Furthermore the church opposes the stem cell therapy. Human comes to an existence at from how the mother carries the embryo, days passed it develops and undergo several stages. Prenatal was a developing human being. From the mother’s womb at a point advance in development embryonic stem cells were kept. An act of direct and willingness to spare a prenatal was always a serious sin or immoral act against God by virtue of it’s a gift from heaven. This basis came from the Catholic Church Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition. Method for obtaining embryonic stem cell that result in the death of the prenatal was gravely immoral, regardless of how the embryo's life begins. Kaufman (2001) “There was definitely a dark side to stem cell research and therapy, however there was hope. This hope maybe intricate to reach yet it’s there.” Stem Cell causes numerous consequences for, it was not reliable and this should undertake deeper studies on the other hand this was the only hope for the person suffering from diseases. We should thank God for the life we have. All of us have a special purpose, it is to live and do God’s will. People were God’s creation all of us were obliged to love one another not to hurt others especially the embryos inside the mother’s

Show More
Related
765 Words | 4 Pages

According to Smiths article researchers call the embryonic stem cells "spare and leftover"(Smith 24). So meaning the embryo is worthless. Smith strongly disagrees and says the use

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

After reading about therapeutic cloning, I’ve come to the conclusion that it is no different than what researchers are trying to do with ES cell research. The difference in the process is that the egg is penetrated, without destroying it and the nucleus is removed with the host DNA and replaced with a nucleus from the cell of the donor that requires the ES cell for therapy. At that point the egg is left to develop into a blastocyst using the donor DNA and the process of extracting the inner cell mass to cultivate the stem cells that are genetically compatible with the

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

The goal with fetal tissue research is to find new and improved ways of dealing with diseases. Almost everyone in our country has used a source that has come from the research of fetal tissue. (Fetal tissue, 5) So on the ethics and morals side of the argument any fetal tissue used for research has helped saved millions of people from dealing with diseases such as chickenpox, flu, etc. The argument most people make is that abortion is evil and shouldn’t be supported.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

However, many find this research unethical because of the method of collecting stem cells. Like Victor Frankenstein’s experiment,

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

I respect their opinions however, in my perspective, I think that human embryonic stem cell is a good thing because you’re using the "unwanted" cells for good use, helping a life, and help finding treatments. Firstly, hundreds of people each day around the world kill/ throw out embryos due to many reasons like for example abortion. However if

Read More
1146 Words | 5 Pages

Allowing those eggs to be more than just thrown in the trash, allowing them to save lives that otherwise cannot be saved would be more beneficial to humans. If you don't agree with stem cell there are alternatives sometimes also other medicines are frowned upon but used because they will save

Read More
1272 Words | 6 Pages

In one use of stem cell research, the DNA from an individual’s stem cell is transplanted into an enucleated egg cell. The egg grows into an embryo from which stem cells, specific to that individual, will be taken. The same process occurs to create a cloned organism, though the embryo is developed rather than destroyed. 7 To permit stem cell research and not cloning would be unfair.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

The use of embryonic stem cells for medical treatment or scientific research is considered one of bioethics greatest controversies. Since the discovery of the uses of embryonic stem in 1981, people have argued that that embryonic stem cell research pushes the bounds of humane ethics. Conversely, others argue that the use of embryonic stem cells follow the principle tenets of bioethics: maximize benefits and minimize harm. Following their discovery, methods to remove embryonic stem cells from humans was discovered in 1998. Shortly after, In 2001, President George W. Bush granted federal funding to the research of hECS.

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

Since some believe that embryos have status as human being, conducting the research is committed a crime of killing. By contrast, there is a perspective that “a blastula is not exactly a child just yet, because unless a blastula is imbedded in the uterus wall, it will never have the chance to develop into a baby” (Euro stem cell resource, 2015). According to that idea, using cells from blastocyst for research and developing medical treatments, which could improve and save people's lives, is much better than an abortion (Euro stem cell resource, 2015). Consequently, stem cell research is extremely a vital medical advancement without the controversial use of

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

As technology advances, more things become possible. One of these things is genetically modifying a baby, this is very wrong. Genetic modifying or genetic engineering is altering someone or something’s DNA. Scientists hope to cure diseases with this method but doing this can lead to some harmful effects. This process is very unethical.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

On the contrary, people do support the idea of Embryonic stem cells because they think that it will help science find new ways to make cures for different

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Many questions arise when discussing such controversial issues (Jaenisch et al.). Some of these questions include "the central, apparently unresolvable issue of the moral status of the human embryo, which raises questions about which perspectives should govern appropriate pluralistic policy" (Jaenisch et al.). There are also questions as to how to weigh the "possible scientific breakthroughs" with the "less quantifiable values and perspectives" (Jaenisch et al.). While there are decent arguments on how the copying of a human being could be

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

Hook Let’s say the government chose what you wear, what you eat, how and when you sleep, what career you pursue and who you marry. Wouldn’t you deem this strict? Unfair? Stupid even? Why then do we believe that we or the government should have a say in a woman’s choice of aborting a fetus?

Read More
1663 Words | 7 Pages

One of the furthermost essential issues in biomedical ethics is the controversy around abortion. There’s a long history on this controversy and it is still critically debated among researchers and the public in both terms of morality and legality. Some of the basic questions argued that may perhaps characterize the importance of the issue: Is abortion morally justifiable? Does the foetus/embryo/zygote have any moral and legal rights? Is the foetus a human being and, if so, should it be protected?

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

The fetus hasn’t begun living outside of the womb, and while it may have potential for some sort of success, that can be true about many things. Ethically, it is acceptable for an abortion to occur. It is a medical procedure, an autonomy, and it is ultimately the decision of the mother. At the stage of acceptable abortion, the service is ethical, and it is removing simply a cluster of developing cells. The actual service of an abortion is completely acceptable, and the choice should be made by the mother and not the

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Regenerative Medicine

Related Topics

Open Document