ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Restrictive Power

472 Words2 Pages

“We need powerful leaders, we fear powerful leaders (Monroe, p.365),” This quote explains exactly how I feel when I comes to the president’s powers, The debate between the president having expansive or restrictive power is a difficult one, they both have their strengths and weaknesses. Although, if I had to choose, I think the safest option for our country would be to keep the president with restricted powers. To be fair neither option is a perfect one they both have their flaws. I understand why people would want the president to have expansive powers, for example in an issue of national security. Forcing every decision to go through congress can be slow or impossible to get anything done, therefore putting us at a threat in any situation that has a time constraint. Although congress is a slower process then allowing the president the power to make a decision by himself, I would still rather keep a restrictive power to the president. I worry that …show more content…

William Howard Taft feared, “Ascribing an undefined residuum of power to the President, is an unsafe doctrine and that it might lead under emergencies to results of an arbitrary character, doing irremediable injustice to private right (Taft, The President and His Powers)” The framers needed something to unify the states in order to help people identify as one country rather than separate states. They decided having a president was a proper solution. They needed the president to play a ceremonial role more so than a leadership role. That’s the reason they gave the president so little power, because they feared too much power resting in a single person. George Washington put it this way, “A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position (Washington, Farewell Address)” Another reason I strongly believe that restrictive power is a better option is because the likely hood of us needing the president

Show More
Related
475 Words | 2 Pages

Brief summary of the reading Richard E. Neustadt in his book, Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan, studies executive power and its primary characteristics of success. Public expect that the presidents do more than what law and constitution allow them to do. As Neustadt argues, “Presidential power is the power to persuade." (Page 11) Persuasion and bargaining are the two main factors that he believes presidents should use to influence their agendas and strategies. Bargaining to encourage other branches of government mostly Congress and the executive branch which he is in control of such as secretaries, heads of government agencies, and individual bureaucrats is necessary.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

This keeps the legislative and judicial branches of government under checks because it allows the president to stop anything unjust from happening; they can also choose who not to nominate as a judge if that nominee doesn't fit the executive branch's

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

The main reason was the fact that they need to amend the Articles of the Confederation. The fathers knew that the original government they built was starting to fall apart at the seams. They then created the new and improved for the structure of the American government. The Articles of the Confederation did one thing that the founding fathers knew they needed to change; it did not give enough power to the government. They were so afraid of creating a government that had too much power they simply didn’t realize where that line between too much and not enough was.

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

Summer Glaze Mrs. Market English 10 28 March 2017 Carl Clauberg Outline Carl Clauberg was a German medical doctor who had become a monster (3). Clauberg being a doctor, helped many people people (3). Clauberg was a Gynaecologist, and an Infantryman (1). After World World II began, Clauberg began conducting sterilization and artificial insemination medical experiments on women, children, and some men (2). Clauberg had met Heinrich Himmler, the leader of the SS and Reichsführer (2).

Read More
1266 Words | 6 Pages

As we entered the 21st century, the presidency became very different from the one created in 1878. The constitution limited the presidency so it wouldn’t become a monarchy. However, the limitations subsided because of the attitudes of the founding fathers, and the next two presidents. Washington, Adams and Jefferson shaped the presidency into more of a positively influenced position in the 1800s. But, from that time until about the 1930s, Congress was the most dominant office in the executive branch.

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

There are five roles of a Presidents in the United States including the first role is Chief of State, the second one is Chief Executive, the third one is Commander-in-Chief, the fourth one is Chief Diplomat, and the last one is Chief Legislator. Chief of State and Chief Executive were born under the establishment of the Constitution. These two roles give the President the power to protect three pillars of the Constitution included Popular Sovereignty, Rule of Law, and Tolerance. To illustrate, President Thomas Jefferson wanted to set the freedom for the United States from the rule of France as well as expand

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

When the Founding Fathers put together the Constitution, they believed not just one person or one group of people should hold all the power. This system has worked well for the democracy in the United States. Congress is a main part in the foreign policy making process, and nothing can be law without Congress approval when it involves money. If the president held all the power and there were no checks-and-balances in place, Congress would have very little authority, if any, to put forth what is in the best interest of the citizens of the United States.

Read More
546 Words | 3 Pages

Should the Executive Privilege Be Absolute In United States, the Executive Privilege played a positive role on the president in domestic and foreign policy decisions, defend national interests and the protection of national defense secrets. However, this privilege can be abused by the president and executive members as well in seizing power, even provide legal basis to disguise their illicit activities at the White House. In my point of view, I think the executive privilege should not be absolute due to lack of transparency and supervision on the matter of personal interest and national security. As the strongest nation across the global, the president and members of the executive of the United States has the power to conduct a number of operations or information in secret and the executive privilege grants them to resist some legislative and branches of government for disclosing those communications if would potentially interfere the functions of executive branch (Legal Information Institute).

Read More
231 Words | 1 Pages

The President of the United States has many powers. However there are a few limits and restraints that are in place to keep the president from too much power over certain matters. The president requires the consent and advice of the Senate on many subjects. An example of this is the failure of the Versailles Treaty in 1919. President Woodrow Wilson didn 't have the support of the Senate to negotiate a peace treaty.

Read More
1725 Words | 7 Pages

Many are taking a gander at an approach to change the framework and others might want to get rid of the framework Understanding the variables that justified the formation of the framework is fundamental. At the point when the constitution was being made, the designers needed to abstain from making a solid official branch. One thought the designers made was to have congress straightforwardly pick the president. Be that as it may, the thought was rejected on the grounds that some felt that settling on this decision would be excessively troublesome and leave ill will in

Read More
113 Words | 1 Pages

I agree with your post because I do think that our founding father would not agree on the expansion of powers of the president. The three branches of our government was created by our founding father in order to balance out the power of the president, so that neither one branch can have too much power over the nation. When they crafted this idea they had seen other country where there is only one prime minister (North Korea and Russia for example) that overseen every action of a nation which the power was too powerful and decision making can be challenging for the citizens when they cannot vote on new law and regulation.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

One would think that one way to remedy this problem would be to concentration more power in the executive branch. This struggle of power is a problem that is found in many countries. Where do you draw the line for executive powers? When does a system become tyrannical? These two questioned were explored by the Framers, and continue to be the point of contentious debate among

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

We all had those moments when we all hated the congress for passing a bill that destroyed their dreams or the president for only who they were or what their stance on certain things, however have you ever thought who really calls the shots, the President or the Congress? Like sure, it would make sense if the President has most of the power, while Congress has some or vice versa. Although when it comes to certain things, the Congress has more power over the situation. In Presidential Influence on Congressional Appropriations Decisions by D. Roderick Kiewiet and Mathew D. McCubbins, they state that the president must possess impressive resources upon which to draw.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

but I also do not agree with congress making the decisions in a time of crisis. I would propose having a cabinet that the american people choose to overlook the president for foreign matters and crisis. Arguably, we have that concept and it’s

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

In recent years there has been debate on whether or not the president has too much power. The president 's power has increased over the years, I believe that this increase has given the president way too much power. The amount of power that the president has, can cause total destruction and can manipulate people into doing things that they do not actually believe in. A president should not have some of the powers that he possess, but they are given to him simply because he is the leader of the country. In my opinion the president should be allowed certain powers in order to run the country properly, he is also the leader of the country which grants him the right to have certain powers according to the constitution.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Restrictive Power

Related Topics

Open Document