ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Stop And Frisk

831 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The impact of racial profiling on the larger society

Stop and Frisk is one of the most controversial police procedures implemented in New York City. This is a limited search where the police officer confronts a person that he or she deems suspicious with the goal being crime prevention. The police officer does this by patting the person down for weapons, as well as questioning the individual. However, the people stopped are predominantly Black and Latino. Many believe that Stop and Frisk is a form of racial profiling. Racial profiling is defined as police action, such as arresting or questioning, which takes place based on a person’s race, ethnicity, or national origin and not merely the behavior of the individual. This is the definition used by Mathis Risse and Richard Zeckhauser in their …show more content…

The alternative could minimize the use of race so that racial profiling becomes moot. Risse and Zeckhauser respond to this argument by saying utilitarians will always welcome alternatives that effectively curb crime for the benefit of the citizenry (pg.151). This is a convenient way to dismiss an argument, rather than prove the counterargument wrong. It is easier to incorporate the counterargument into one’s own argument. The fact still remains that Risse and Zeckhauser’s utilitarian view on racial profiling is flawed, specifically the expressive harm portion of the …show more content…

This is an assumption that is proven without evidence. For Risse and Zeckhauser, racial profiling is not a form of racism, nor its resulting harms. The harms are a symptom of expressions that occur in society. Instead, the consequences of profiling are viewed as innocent. The relationship between racial profiling and racism painted by Risse and Zeckhauser is implausible. The individual is required to picture a society where racism plays no role in law enforcement’s use of racial profiling over other plausible ways of responding to racial disparities in crime. It also asks the individual to believe that racial profiling of minorities can be executed fairly in a society that is viewed as racist. Only on these assumptions can an individual make the objection to racial profiling as an objection to racism rather than profiling. Therefore, the harms of racial profiling are identified with racism instead of racial profiling. These assumptions are hard for minorities to grasp. Therefore, Risse and Zeckhauser’s expressive harm depends on an implausible relationship between racial profiling and racism. Racial habits according to expressive harm seem peripheral, thus deflecting attention away from the effects of racial

Show More
Related
447 Words | 2 Pages

They are harassed, fisked in what they say “ breathtaking numbers .” More than 45,000 people were stopped and harassed by member’s of the street crime unit in 1997 throughout 1998. Over more then ten thousand people were arrested due to specious acts. Bob Herbert introduces Mayor Giuliani from New York, and how he states that “ The stop are driven by the descriptions of the person who committed the crime.” (Giuliani 1)

Read More
1862 Words | 8 Pages

The severity of racial profiling is very concerning. As proven by numerous texts studied for this Expository Writing class, it is evident that the Black respondents of Otis Johnson’s poll, analyzing citizens’ relationships with the police, are not the only Black people that: “expressed far less confidence than whites in local police to treat both races equally” (Johnson). In White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack, Peggy McIntosh describes various privileges which sound ordinary, though surprisingly only White people have. Among them, is one that affects all people on a daily basis: “If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race” (McIntosh). Governmental

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Argument nowadays has become fruitless-getting nowhere because people listen to argue and not to understand. However, in the speech “Hard Truths: Law Enforcements and Race” given by the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I), James B. Comey addresses that it is imperative to not only listen but understand the differences in perspectives when discussing racial profiling. Furthermore, he implores his audience to consider that the topic about law enforcement dealing with race is much more complicated than it seems. Comey’s implicit thesis does support that there is evidence of racial bias in law enforcement; moreover, his purpose is to establish sympathy for the two opposing sides: law enforcements and the people of color. Overall,

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

In his essay “Arrested Development: The Conservative Case Against Racial Profiling” published in the New Republic on September 10, 2001, professor James Forman Jr. illustrates his disagreement with racial profiling. Forman Jr. is a professor at Yale Law School. He teaches Constitutional Law and seminars on race and the criminal justice system. In his piece, Forman primary goal is to create understanding about the effectiveness of racial profiling and how this affects the black community especially youths. Forman achieves this by appealing to a liberal audience.

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

The safety of the community is crucial and attempting to deam stop and frisk as unconstitutional limits law enforcement. There is much controversy on how it can target a certain group or race but I believe the goal of any police is to deter crime when implementing stop and frisk. I believe stop and frisk can help reduce crimes and eliminate potential crime in a city, neighborhood, or street. Boyette, C., & Martinez, M. (2013).

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

Jesper Ryberg, a professor in the Department of Philosophy and Science Studies at the University of Roskilde, Denmark, questions the use of racial profiling as a way of reducing crime. He also examines the ethics of the criminal justice system in its degree or levels of punishment for certain crimes. His first contention is that when racial profiling is used by law enforcement as a means of reducing crime, there will be a disproportionate number of that ethnic group charged and punished for crimes. That certainly will reduce some crimes. However, that leaves the majority group with more liberties and freedoms to commit more crimes.

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

The practical imperative orders that we never use people as a means to an end, or for any reason; People can’t be used to further an agenda, or for a result. The intent of aggressive stop and frisks may be a variety of reasons, officer safety, to create police omnipresence, or to further the individual police officer’s profiling agenda. The stop and frisk policy includes the use of many people in 2015, of the 22,939 citizens who were stopped, only 20% of them were arrested. This means that 18,353 completely innocent citizens were inconvenienced, and possibly afraid. The standard of suspicion for stop and frisk is only reasonable suspicion.

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

This law usually targets youth and people of color and this is extremly important reasons to stop it. A first example that shows that the law is not legal is that tons of people who get stopped are innocent. The second example that shows the illegality of the law would be that it is a discriminatory and racist law. However, other people have different opinions, other people think that "stop and frisk" help protects people from people that look suspicious and may risk the safety our society. " Stop and frisk" should not be a law because instead of helping and protecting people it discriminates against people and disrespects the.

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

The job of the police officers is to protect all citizens from any threat and help us to be safe on the streets. Stop and frisk is a practice that the New York City Police Department uses as a way to fight crime, however, stop and frisk is unjust and has resulted in racial discrimination by officers, as well as an abuse of power. Over the years many civilians have been stopped and frisked by the police, this irritates some people as they feel they are stopped purposely or for no reason. So can police frisking in some cases go too far?

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

III. Racial profiling is an additional measure for safety and security as it is a mean to prevent crimes (Gross, Livingston, 2002). (Counterargument) Terrorist have managed to surpass security measures before, so this makes racial profiling justifiable, as other tactics have failed, and whatever we can do to prevent terrorism, needs to be done (Murray, 2010, p.23).

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

Racial Profiling: Racial Profiling is one of the main problems in society as African Americans. Racial profiling often includes stopping others on the highways, finding “suspicious activities” in neighborhoods or along the side of the highway and also questioning the victims once the police pulled the victim's over. By doing such actions, the police has caught a lot of drug smugglers and undocumented immigrants. Just like the statement in the introduction is a prime example of racial profiling.

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

Racial profiling, targeting certain individuals for crimes, that is based on their race and ethnicity is a continued debate, throughout societies past and present; especially when it comes to law enforcement. When law enforcement portrays a profile about particular people that commit certain crime can lead an officer to observe individuals and act according to one’s race that the officer sees, rather than their specific behavior or crimes that have been committed. However, with racial profiling being so controversial it is not a surprise that people will have different views on this issue. Authors Jared Taylor and Glayde Whitney offer reasons to why racial profiling is an acceptable law enforcement strategy by stating, “Nevertheless, blacks

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

For me racial profiling is wrong and I see why but in some cases it is understandable. The main question always asked or thought about is racial profiling illegal well it depends the power of an authority to stop and frisk vary from the location or country. But profiling

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Racial profiling has become a national issue starting in 2015 (“Racial”). Judging someone for their race has been a problem ever since a minority group has been noticed. Racial profiling has spread over all over the world. Racial profiling has been a problem through the years, if the human race can learn what racial profiling is, advantages of the profiling, and the disadvantages.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

Racial profiling is a very important issue that individuals in society face every day. This problem occurs in low income or poverty-stricken areas throughout cities and communities across the nation. Hundreds of anecdotal testimonials allege that law enforcement officials at all levels of government are infringing upon the constitutional rights and civil liberties of racial and ethnic minorities through a practice called “racial profiling” (Ward, 2002). So what is racial profiling? According to the National Institute of Justice, racial profiling by law enforcement is commonly defined as a practice that targets people for suspicion of crime based on their race, ethnicity, religion or national origin (National Institute of Justice, 2013).

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Stop And Frisk

Related Topics

Open Document