ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The American Jury System

783 Words4 Pages

The american jury system is one of the most controversial and outdated things in the american court system. The american jury system works as a way for a convicted person on trial to have their fate decided by a group of 12 random people of the community. From the time this system was put into place in the court system it has been a highly debated topic for the people of america for a couple reasons. Lots of ordinary people in the community will talk about how they dread when they are picked for jury duty, jury duty makes the people who are chosen to take a day off work and lose a whole day's pay and pretty much waste a person's time. The jury system has been around since the 1400’s(timeline), it first started in england and like most stuff in the constitution it was based off the english ideas like jury duty. …show more content…

A bench trial is a trial where the convicted person's fate is decided by the judge, a trial by jury is when 12 random people are called upon by the court and are chosen to be part of the jury to hear the trial and decide the fate of the person being accused in the trial. Most times the decision has to be unanimous or if the jury cannot decide they will call a hung jury and a new set of 12 people will be brung in to decide the trial. The person that is on trial has the right to decide if they want a trial by jury or a bench trial. “The role of jury service in promoting self-governance and civic participation is hardly an accident. The framers of the united states constitution viewed jury service as a critically important feature of self-governance and guaranteed the right to serve on juries in the seventh amendment.” (document C) Only people who are registered to vote and are over the age of eighteen are eligible to be called upon for jury

Show More
Related
515 Words | 3 Pages

The Founding Fathers wanted the people of the United States to be in a democracy or self-government and established the jury system into the constitution. It is expensive and is a long process to start a jury trial. Also, jurors are not as professional as judges and can not determine a fair verdict. The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) effect might also affect the verdict of the jury. The American jury system should not be used because of it not being cost-effective, the lack of experience of the jury, which leads to justice not being served, and the CSI effect impacting the

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

In the aforementioned comic, “Jury,” an unamused man thinks to himself, “A misdemeanor!? They’re wasting my time with a [expletive] misdemeanor!? Next time, I’m demanding a felony!” (Document E, 297). It is true that jury duty is a civic duty, but many citizens appear to share this man’s opinion on it.

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

Americans have control over the legislative and the executive branch of government by being able to elect leaders and think up an idea for a law. Even though the people do not get to elect judges in the judicial branch, they get to be a part of it themselves. The jury system encourages citizens to show their citizenship. Furthermore, it turns ordinary people into self-governors (Doc C). By people being apart of the jury system they are “promoting self-governance and civic participation” while they decide if a person is guilty or not guilty (Doc C).

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

This is stated in Document C in the Jury System Mini-Q “Observers of the American jury system have remarked on its ability to elevate ordinary citizens into self-governors…” This is stating that the jury system is let alone remarkable that it is also a way that will increase the motives of people to present them to the government. On the Importance of the Jury System it states that “The Jury service is a duty of citizenship, similar to paying taxes and voting.” This is saying that people view this as an act of duty that just as paying taxes and voting people have to give back to their government and participate in the jury trial. Another quote from The Role of the Public is “Courts have a responsibility to perform at a higher level of respect to citizens serving as jurors and to improve every aspect of their jury systems.”

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The American Jury System offers the United States citizens an opportunity to be proven guilty or innocent when a crime has been committed. The twelve person jury system was established in England hundreds of years ago. Originally this system was made up of twelve men and this was huge because they had the power to go against what the judge wanted in court. There are many vital points as to why our American jury system is successful; jury trials by the numbers, ownership by jury members towards the accused, how reliable or unreliable evidence is viewed by jurors, gender balance and the detailed screening process in which jurors are selected.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

I’ll kill him! I’ll kill him!” By allowing every citizen to serve on the jury it can cause the jurors to get off topic and bring in personal matters not needed. If they were selective, verdicts would be made faster and wouldn't allow the jurors to be sidetracked. Those are the reasons why every American citizen should serve on the a jury.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Is the American Jury System still a Good Idea? In the American Judicial System today, there is a choice between trial by jury or bench trial. Trial by jury is used today by selecting jurors from pools of people who are eligible, adult American citizens. Trial by jury is often controversial because of how the jurors are not professionals whereas in a bench trial, a judge is highly educated in law (Doc B).

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

Everyone’s heard of Jury Duty. But the question is if we should kept the American Jury system. What do you think?Do you feel comfortable deciding if someone is guilty or would you rather have the judge decide?It shows that a tiny fraction of the civil cases and a modest percentage of the criminal trial involve a jury. Jury trials should no longer be. Just because people that are in the jury trial might not know what their doing, because they are not professionals.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

Citizen Required To Serve? Jury a group of citizens sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court. Being able to serve on a jury is an absolute privilege to do for some and one thing that makes this country very different and unique from others. Serving on a jury should not be required for citizens. Some people believe serving on a jury should be a requirement for every citizen.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Only 0.58% of cases get sent to trial by jury. A jury is a group of 12 men or women that have to make the decision in the case after listening to the whole case. They sit in a cramped box to try to reduce distractions. The reality is that they don't really pay attention and mess up the outcome a lot of times. Is the American Jury System Still a Good Idea?

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

A jury is a body of typically twelve people, who give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence presented to them in court. The jurors independently review the evidence that is presented by either prosecuting or defending barristers, or solicitor advocates and they are required to come to a decision whether the accused is guilty or not guilty. To become a juror you must be between the ages of 18-70, be registered as someone who can vote in either the parliamentary or local authority elections, a resident in the UK, the channel islands or the Isle of Man for at least 5 years since their 13th birthday and not subject to any of the disqualifications. Jurors also have to undergo background checks.

Read More
256 Words | 2 Pages

Being a jury is a big responsibility of the citizen. Fourteen years old or older people are chosen to be tried by a judge and jury for certain serious offences. For the offences, juries always have twelve people and they have to come up with an possibilities of the punishments for the accused person by all the facts and evidences. By having twelve people in juries more than one viewpoints and perspectives can be seen and heard. The one and only judge will look at the facts laid by the lawyers whereas a jury can look at different opinions by different way of thinking.

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

No. 8: I think that the jury system we have today has its own advantages and disadvantages. For example, a jury that consists of jurors who are biased could be manipulated by ‘outsiders’ through bribery or some jurors, as we have discussed before, might have some personal prejudices/beliefs that may affect their decision making. But there are some advantages as well because the decision that is made by the jury is thought out very carefully by a group of people. Interviewer: [gathers all his papers]

Read More
179 Words | 1 Pages

The judge assigned to the case is responsible for the selection of jurors to serve as the jury in a particular case. The reason as to why the jury system was established to reach a fairer judgement of the case than using the judge’s conclusion alone. Because a jury

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The American Jury System

Related Topics

Open Document