ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

852 Words4 Pages

of the Constitution to the states for consideration. To amend the Articles of Confederation had required unanimous approval of the states. The delegates agreed to change the approval process for the Constitution so only nine of the thirteen states had approved. After this, the new government of the United States would come into existence. Though the delegates at Philadelphia had produced the Constitution, it still had to be accepted by the people. Before the Constitution could go into effect, nine states needed to ratify it. To get people more used to the idea of the Constitution, state legislatures set up special ratifying conventions to consider the document. By late 1787 these conventions started to meet, however Rhode Island stood apart. Its leaders opposed the Constitution from the beginning and therefore …show more content…

Rhode Island’s leaders were considered Antifederalists or people who didn’t approve the Constitution. Antifederalists criticized the Constitution because it lacked a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms and believed that no government could be trusted to protect the freedom of its citizens. Several state conventions took a stand and announced that they would not ratify the Constitution without the addition of a bill of rights. One Antifederalist named Mercy Otis Warren expressed the problem faced by many Antifederalists and admitted the need for a strong government but feared it. But the Constitution still had supporters called Federalists. Three of the nation’s most gifted political thinkers ,James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, also backed the Constitution. They all worked together to write a series of essays explaining and defending the Constitution. These essays, called the Federalist Papers, appeared in newspapers around the country and were widely read. The Federalist Papers were later published as a book and sent to delegates at the remaining ratifying conventions.

Show More
Related
598 Words | 3 Pages

Answer: Massachusetts farmers opposed the Constitution in light of the fact that they felt it ensured exchange more than horticulture, the Federalist Papers were distributed there to pick up backing for it. Virginia and New York would not ratify until the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. In light of the opposition, John Hancock at the Massachusetts ratifying tradition suggested that a bill of rights be included as the first gathering of amendments to the Constitution. Ratification in Massachusetts and pretty much all whatever remains of the uncommitted states relied on upon the comprehension that receiving a bill of rights would be the new government's first request of business. There were the opposition which was made out of assorted

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

3. Each state had a convention and nine out of thirteen states had to approve the Constitution in order for it to go into effect. 2. Comprehension and Critical Thinking 4.a. Congress under the Articles of Confederation could not regulate trade or collect taxes.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

(other wise known as the poor) The leaders of the Antifederalist were people like Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry. Although the leaders held more power and wealth than the people who followed them, Henry was notorious for fighting for individual liberties, such as a Bill of Rights. Which was one of the Antifederalists main objectives because it would give them basic liberties. The AntiFederalists were also scared of the power a central government would have.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
1839 Words | 8 Pages

The Anti-Federalist who were strongly opposed to the Constitution felt the document

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

After the 13 colonies had declared independence from Britain and King George, they were quick to draft their own constitution. Most of which was inspired by Enlightenment thinkers and their philosophies, like those of John Locke, Montesquieu, and copious amount of more. The Articles of Confederation first drafted in the year 1777, but was not ratified until 1781. Nonetheless, this was quickly changed when people realized that the Articles of Confederation was ineffective. Therefore, it was replaced and led to the Constitution to be drafted.

Read More
288 Words | 2 Pages

Their votes were enough to put the Constitution into effect. Two states, however, refused to sign it– North Carolina and Rhode Island. Critics in these states objected that a Bill of Rights hadn’t been included. They worried that without a Bill of Rights the government might eventually become too strong. It might be unjust and put people in jail without a reason.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

The constitution was signed by delegates in Philadelphia on September 17, 1787. The government was not strong at the time and states worked like independent countries. At the 1787 convention, delegates found a way for the US to have a government with three branches,executive, legislative and judicial along with checks and balances to make sure no one would have more power than the other. Some features of principles incorporated are the amending process,Limited government and checks and balances. The Amending technique is given by the Congress with ⅔ vote by the House of Reps and the Senate or a agreement that wants two-thirds of the State legislaturesThe right to revise the Constitution is obtained from Article V.None of the 27 amendments

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

Congress soon realized that the Article of Confederation wasn 't as strong of a constitution they hoped for. In fact, James Madison believed the Article was just a "rope of sand" that would hold the nation together. The nation they had passionately fought for was breaking apart due to a flimsy constitution and something had to happen before matters turn to worse. Things had to happen before anything more could become worse. In February of 1787, fifty-five delegates from twelve states of America, came together to create the new Constitution.

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

The ratification of the constitution first needed to be approve of two thirds of the thirteen state governments before it became accepted as the law of the land. While there certainly were people who were happy with the constitution there are also many who were suspicious of it. Those people who were afraid was because of a strong powerful federal government. To kind of ease people’s fears and to state what it was all about they wrote a series of essays that are known as the Federalist papers.

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

These are the people that disagree with the constitution. These people believe the constitution will only make this country an even worse nation. These are the people that supported the crown of King George the III. Similar beliefs to the bill of rights. Many people agree with it and many people disagree with it.

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

There are always two sides of an argument, in this case for ratifying the constitution there were the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. Federalist wanted to ratify the constitution because a powerful government would help many individuals under it, “The constitution would find its supporters among the farmers and workingmen of the nation, of course. Urban artisans and small shopkeepers saw the advantages of a government powerful enough to increase commerce and trade. And backcountry subsistence farmers facing hostile Indians and their Spanish allies on state borders saw the virtue in a government strong enough to repel frontier enemies or negotiate favorable international treaties”(pg 173). Furthermore, the only people that opposed it were the wealthy and educated which were the very few in the nation, they even wanted a new constitution but not the one being

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

In May of 1787 the Constitution was put in the beginning stages. For roughly four and a half months the documents was worked on by delegates in a private location. Every delegate signed the finished Constitution on September 17, 1787. Even though it was finished and signed every state had to approve or disapprove it. If at least two-thirds of the states approved it then the constitution would be ratified.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

Amending the Constitution The United States Constitution was ratified by all the original 13 colonies on May 29, 1790 (History.com). The reason for the states feeling the need to create the Constitution was because the states were operating like independent countries instead of a whole unified country. The Constitution was supposed to unite everyone. Today, the Constitution has 27 amendments and through all the changes this country has gone through since it was ratified in 1790, it has continued remain an important staple of our modern government.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

Open Document