ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Endangered Species Act

1026 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why should we protect endangered species

Almost all of currently threatened species are at risk because of human activities, mainly due or habitat loss, introduction of exotic species or global warming. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) plans to change this. “The ESA was enacted by Congress in 1973. It states that the federal government has the responsibility to protect endangered species, threatened species and critical habitats. The ESA has a list to protect plants and animals nationally and worldwide. In 2009 there were 1,361 endangered or threatened plants or animals. The ESA looks at the overall health of a species and also scientific data. A few factors come into play as well, such as urgency and whether adequate protections exist through other means. Their main checklist asks …show more content…

According to research the ESA has been very successful in helping to help these species come back. “The Endangered Species Act has been successful in increasing the number of species that are considered as being on the brink of extinction. After all, this is the largest pro of this law and also its main goal”("14 Compelling"). This is important because it is the largest argument for this topic and also because it helps species of animals that are dying come back and start to thrive again. The endangered species act must be kept to keep the dying and endangered …show more content…

Based on information released by the ESA they believe that knowledge is our greatest combatant against the crisis of endangered species dying forever. “One of the greatest impacts this law has had on society is the level of awareness that has been raised for animal species. Once animals are gone, they cannot be brought back. To stop this from happening, education is our best weapon. This law forces people to be aware of the environment and help naturally protect it. Actually, it has undergone several changes so that it can effectively protect our ecosystem and ensure endangered or threatened species to recover their numbers despite being at the brink of extinction at certain times.” ("14 Compelling"). This is important because it shows the population that is not possible to bring back lost species and that just knowledge of this helps out. This act shows how much it will give the human population a sense of environmental awareness. The endangered species act must be kept because it creates environmental awareness for the human population and gives them a reason to protect these

Show More
Related
277 Words | 2 Pages

Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

Contrary to a popular, exaggerated thought among the settlers in the 1800s—that the West was unoccupied and perfect for settlers to claim—around a quarter million Native Americans inhabited these lands for long periods of time. Some lived there as a result of the Indian Removal Act (1830), where many tribes in the east were forced to walk the “Trail of Tears” and were relocated to present-day Oklahoma. Settlers viewed these groups as potential threats that would interfere with their westward expansion plans. Therefore, they wished for these tribes to be removed from the Great Plains. To accomplish these goals, treaties were created, but eventually, settlers and the local militias, with the support of the federal government, used more violent and drastic methods.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

The Indian Removal act was a complete step in the wrong direction for our Nation. This act gave federal government power to relocate the Native Americans in the East. This occurred in the West of the Mississippi River in about 1830-1840. About 60,000 natives suffered from the Indian removal Act. Americans should be against Indian Removal Act because it was a huge event of discrimination, removed the Native Americans harshly and violently from their land, and treated Natives unfairly.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

This astonishing fact may really affect those who care about endangered animals. The last sentence in this essay is a big push to motivate the reader. By explaining that “the bald eagles and mountain lions depend on us” (par.23), this attempts to convince the reader to take bigger

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

The first major law created was the National Environmental Policies Act in 1969. This law required federal agencies to look at, and report problems within the environment impacted by human development of land, and use of resources. The problems are than reported to the public allowing for informed decisions on what environmental consequences there might be for project development. Next, came the National Forest Management Act created in 1976 that developed the idea that forests would be managed based on the land use plans of the area of the forest while also developing forest diversity, and diversity of wildlife in them. In 1973 the Endangered Species Act was created.

Read More
377 Words | 2 Pages

The Endangered Species Act was passed into law on December 28, 1973, the act was designed to conserve and save threatened plants, animals, and their habitats. The Endangered Species Act is widely supported, and around 87% of Americans agree that the act is a successful way to keep endangered and threatened animals safe. The act has numerous positive effects on plant, and animal life, these positive effects are saving endangered and threatened species, preserving their ecosystem, and protecting plants and animals that assist in treating diseases. According to the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, 99% of species ever listed on the endangerment list remain on the planet today. The Bald Eagle is one of the many species saved by the Endangered Species

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

Due to poaching, your favorite animals might be getting killed each day slowly decreasing their population, even though there are laws that are supposed to prevent this. Studies show that thousands of animals are getting killed each year and the hunters are not getting enough discipline for their actions. Though, they should not get the death penalty, they should at least get some type of restraint. Although many people think poachers should not get extreme punishment for their crimes, poaching laws should become harsher because killers are not getting enough retribution, people are wearing animals as clothes, and species are getting endangered.

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

The protection of environment is crucial to the wellbeing of this planet. The job of government is to protect and preserve the land on which its people live. However, there is a bill being considered that completely goes against this, one that calls for the eradication of the Environmental Protection Agency, a government program created to protect human and environmental wellbeing through their regulation of laws. I urge you to oppose bill H.R. 861 - the termination of the Environmental Protection Agency - because of the ways that the EPA protects air, water, and land.

Read More
1618 Words | 7 Pages

Invasive Species Invasive, alien species, those which colonise, expand and out compete native species (Smith & Smith, 2009), are a major threat to our habitats, terrestrial and aquatic species, and biodiversity. Agricultural and leisure industries are affected as well as conservation welfare and the continued wellbeing of man, flora and fauna. Whole ecosystems can be distorted and the economic cost of awareness, prevention and eradication systems is substantial. Most invasive species have been introduced by mandeliberately or otherwise. As an island, Ireland has been subjected to less invasive species than larger nearby land masses e.g. Europe, but islands have a less diverse species population and are therefore more vulnerable when invaded.

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

I think that Utilitarianism would best fit this scenario. Why you say? Because would it be for the good of society? I say it wouldn’t be good for society. For one, you would have to make sure the land had fencing to keep the endangered species from roaming into normal neighbor hoods and endangering the welfare of the people around that land.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

This exposure and education motivate people to protect the animals and provide entertainment. Zoos save endangered species by bringing them into a safe environment, where they are protected from poachers, habitat loss, starvation, and predators. “The Arabian Oryx was hunted to extinction in the wild. However, from just a handful of animals in captivity the species was brought back from the brink thanks the conservation efforts of Phoenix Zoo and others.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever thought about which animals are near extinction or endangerment ? Have you looked them up? How many are left? Which ones have been removed? Do you know why they are going endangered?

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Zoos may be very necessary for endangered species. But, there are different ways how to save and continue endangered species, and every zoo have had choice how they do it. Some zoos are breeding endangered species trying to continue the species, but that is not right, because it leads to very complicated health issues. For example white tiger who are very rare animal, breeding requirements are that all white tigers parents must be white tigers too, to get only white tiger, and so are zoos breeding white tigers fathers with their daughters and mothers with their sons. But some zoos again are preserving and studying endangered species in captivity to save endangered species in the wild.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Wildlife Conservation is often seen as a bad thing, but if you look at it from my perspective, then it is actually a good thing. People think of it as holding wild animals captive, but we are actually protecting them from poachers. The purpose of Wildlife Conservation is to protect the animals in danger, which I am in agreement 110%. Other people argue that we shouldn’t have conservations, but they don’t know the harm that can happen to unprotected animals.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Zoos have been around since the eighteenth century. A zoo is defined as a compound where wild animals are kept for viewing and studying. The purpose of a zoo is mainly for education and protection, preserving animal species that are either at a risk of becoming extinct or for increased collection size (Jamieson). Animals from around the world have been enclosed in an area where we can admire and study these fine creatures. However, many modern zoos around the world have introduced animal shows, petting and feeding sessions to attract more visitors in order to earn more money.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Endangered Species Act

Related Topics

Open Document