The Times Union Editorial Board warns Americans about the dangers of their actions in their article “We Must Step Up Efforts to Save Endangered Animals.” They adopt a frantic tone in order to make the reader worry about what they’re doing. The Editorial Board uses pathos, logos, and ethos to convince the U.S. population to consider their actions. To begin with, The Times Union Editorial Board uses logos to prove how badly some animals are being affected. They start by analyzing how many wild animals have been lost. From a report in 2016, they explain “within four short years, the earth will have lost two-thirds of its wild animals” (par.2). By offering statistics, the reader is educated about what is going to happen in the future. Elephants, Bald Eagles, and Mountain Lions are just some of the animals being killed. Proof is that “in the last three years poachers have killed over 100,000 elephants” (par.9). Americans need to know how drastic the numbers of these deaths are. The Board doesn't think enough ocean habitats are safe. They support this with “only 1 percent of marine habitats (are) strictly protected” (par.12). This last statistic allows the reader to realize just how much needs to …show more content…
This is a simple strategy to use in this essay because people have feelings towards animals. The “growing human population often pushes the giant beasts off their grazing lands” (par.7). This was an effective way of making the readers feel guilty of their actions. The amount of animals being killed also makes the audience feel bad. To many’s shock, “one elephant is slaughtered by poachers every 15 minutes” (par.10). This astonishing fact may really affect those who care about endangered animals. The last sentence in this essay is a big push to motivate the reader. By explaining that “the bald eagles and mountain lions depend on us” (par.23), this attempts to convince the reader to take bigger