Extinction Essays

Extinction’s Conclusion Throughout The Sixth Extinction, author Elizabeth Kolbert explains how several different natural species have gone extinct or seen their populations dwindle. Each section is unique: no species dies the same way. Kolbert elaborates how extinction has never been uniformitarian or catastrophist but rather a combination of the two. Consequently, the last chapter effectively demonstrates the tragedy of an anthropogenic based extinction but fails to express any urgency or necessity

Between 1960 and 2000, the human population `throughout the world has doubled, but the animal population has declined by 30%. This is an overwhelming fact, yet it is a staggering reality that will only get more atrocious If the human race continues to act in this self-centered way that is a cycle that has been going on for centuries. Human requisites should not be prioritized over the requisites of animals and the planet because this will disrupt the delicate balance of the ecosystem and will eventually

caused the extinction of the Neanderthals around forty thousand years ago. Some researchers speculate that Neanderthals did not develop sufficient tools that would allow them to gather and hunt food efficiently while others speculate that early modern humans introduced deadly pathogens into Neanderthal populations which led to their extinction. However, researchers led by zooarchaeologist Jamie Hodgkins have found that frequent and lengthy glacial periods may have led to the extinction of the Neanderthals

Extinction of an animal or plant species occurs when there are no more individuals of that species alive anywhere in the world. The species has died out. It is a natural cause of evolution. Although they’re not many species to go extinct in Iowa, the modern day rate of extinctions is quite high. Many of the extinct animals listed people did not know were Iowans. Blue Pike (Sander Vitreus Glaucus). Many of the Blue Pike fish lived in the Great Lakes as recently as the 1950’s. This fish was representing

brought back to earth? In my opinion I think that de-extinction is a bad idea. Take the wooly mammoth for example, if scientists were to bring it back they could be taking resources away from other species causing them to disappear, humans might try to harm other animals that aren’t extinct, and scientists would have to successfully re-introduce this animal back into the lifestyle they used to have. Although some people believe that de-extinction is a good thing, I strongly disagree because of those

De-extinction is the process of bringing back a species that has been permanently removed, or extinct. Today’s budding technology has brought about the question of whether or not it will be possible to “resurrect” species that once inhabited the earth. Some may argue that bringing back these species will expand the present day technology. Extinct species should not be brought back, due to the expenses, the need for conservation, and the lack of habitats for the species to be placed. As technology

This could be really bad ,because we would be using too much money on de-extinction, we wouldn’t care about endangered animals, they could mess up the ecosystem, and even bring back dangerous viruses. De-extinction is not a good idea. One reason why de-extinction should be stopped is ,because we are spending a lot of money on animals that are dead ,when there are living animals that need our help. In the article De-Extinction probably isn’t worth it ,it says, “Conservation funds are limited as it

I claim that bring back extinct animals/ de-extinction is a good thing. There are many reasons that you should bring back extinct animals such as It could stop global warming, it could help repopulate animals that are close to being extinct, and many more reasons more that supports the idea that de-extinction is a amazingthing! I am thrilled to tell you about this. Oh the world of science might be onto something here. If you were to repopulate animals and put them in the tundra it would slow the

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated,” (Mahatma Gandhi). People should understand that animal extinction can be slowed, even climate change deniers. By looking at pollution, habitat degradation, global warming/climate change, and solution, animal extinction can be helped and decrease. Firstly, to mention that animals are being hurt with human products because people leave their trash in the environment. Under many circumstances, pollution

Paleogeography This geological evidence is only one piece of the puzzle and only gave paleontologists some clues regarding the changing environmental conditions that played a role in the Devonian extinction. Examinations of the changing paleogeography during this time also shed light on factors that may have affected the placoderms. The world map of the Devonian looked very different from the world map today. Things were moving towards the formation of Pangea, which meant that continents were coming

De-extinction is the process of resurrecting a species and creating an organism of that same species or one that resembles it. In the case of the process of de-extinction, the costs and risks of the process out weigh the benefits. Some costs are there is no way to be confident whether or not the species will be able to survive in the conditions of today’s environment and if the species does there is a high chance that they will greatly effect the ecosystem they are placed in. Why spend time and money

Since the release of “Jurassic Park”, scientists have discussed and worked to develop de extinction, or the cloning of extinct species from the ancient past using biotechnology. While the idea of de extinction is enticing at first glance, and if achieved would be a biological triumph, many oppose this plan. The actual science of de extinction has lagged behind the fictional adaptions; and with the concern of conservation, many wonder if it’s even worth it. I personally believe extinct species shouldn’t

Species extinction has been one of the most serious environmental issues since the past centuries. Scientists have estimated that the current extinction rate is between one thousand to ten thousand times higher than the natural extinction rate. Every year, between 0.1 and 0.01% of species become extinct (Chivian & Bernstein, 2008). However, with recent breakthroughs in stem cell research, there is a glimpse of hope that this situation is about to change. The developments in bioscience technology

De-extinction is an interesting thing. Although it may seem cool, it can be very dangerous. These animals scientists bring back could have diseases which could be fatal to our community now. While de-extinction may seem dangerous, there are also some positives to this. Bringing back extinct animals can also bring back extinct wildlife. Bringing back old wildlife and animals seem like a good idea, but there is also many dangers. Scientists do not know what the earth was like millions of years

can’t do bad right?In the informative essay “De-Extinction”, “we have no idea what havoc we might cause in doing so. Many extinct creatures were fearsome killers that would be very dangerous to humans” and in the Greek Mythology “Prometheus the Friend of Man”, “But Prometheus did not utter a groan in spite of all his sufferings. Year after year he lay in agony, and yet he would not complain, beg for mercy or repent of what he had done”. Both “De-Extinction” and “Prometheus, the Friend of Man”, takes

The book title the sixth Extinction Written by Elizabeth Kolbert is based on The extinction of species. Author Kolbert discusses personal research and scientific studies of certain species that have become extinct are becoming extinct. One species Kolbert discusses in her research studies is the Panama Golden A discovery of a fugues that has brought extinction of the golden frog from wild and has speared throughout different counties including the United States. Kolbert travels to Panama to

Adriana Mota 01/14/17 ANTH1 Rachel Mitchell De-Extinction: Argument FOR by Adriana Mota For decades, anthropogenic activities have been blamed for the deteriorating balance of nature. Humans have been the central target in the criticism due to their disruptive effect on the balance of nature. Historical accounts provide clues on the ancient presence and distribution of flora and fauna. This information reveals the natural balance between flora and fauna and a self-sustaining ecological system.

back to life again? By Caitlin Selge SACE no. 224556J The following is an issues investigation into the topic of “Could and should we clone extinct animals to bring them back to life again?” Firstly it will be discussed if the fantasy idea of de-extinction is even possible, and then if it is something that should occur in our future will be looked into. Cloning is something that is often seen as an impossible thing, something that only occurs in sci-fi movies. But it is possible, and scientists

Mass Extinction. Source: https://worldatlas.com Mass extinction has impacted our earth's evolution tremendously. From as far back as 500 million years ago during the Cambrian period, to as close to us now 65 million years ago during the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event, and all 3 events in between have affected the animals and plants surrounding our planet gigantically. Mass extinction is when there is a rapid decrease of animals and plant species on earth due to the earth's natural disasters

De-Extinction, a interesting topic that most people don’t have an opinion on. De-extinction is a process which uses the DNA of extinct animals and use a surrogate mother and father to bring back an extinct animal. Scientists are working on ways to bring back animals such as wooly mammoths and maybe even dinosaurs. This is a very hopeful topic from different points of view, and a very scary topic from others. Also, some scientists think it’s impossible for certain animals and not for others. For example