ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Bringing Back Extinct Animals

432 Words2 Pages

Think about bring extinct animals back to this earth and changing history forever in this world. The reason I say that we should bring back extinct animals is because it will make the world back to its old self. Which basically means changing the environment of planet Earth. I bet you are thinking we don’t need to change the environment but really we have to. In paragraph 1 of Why we should back extinct animals the author says,” Bringing back theses animals will change the environment.” This is true because our world is going through of a lot of changing and this is affecting us as humans. The author also claims in paragraph 2 that,” Bringing animals back will regend plants faster and stop them and other animals not to die out so fast.” …show more content…

The aouthor is disagrring why we should not bring back exinct anoimals. The reason he is disagreeing against exinct animals is because in one of his paragraphs he says,”Health: Species could carry retroviruses or pathogens when brought back to life.” This is a very big point because we don’t know what exinct animals carry and what can of diesese it has. We don’t know if we can handel these dieses or even have the right medicene. Why do you think that they gone exincted. They are gone for a reason. In the paragraoh that I found this evidence the Auothor quotes,¨Is de-extinction playing god, or just plain wrong? It may also have unforeseen consequences.” The quote shows me and I hope to you too that also it seems cool it comes with a risk.’’ Also, In the article that I like that the auothor quotes is,“De-extinction may change priorities in other fields of science, such as medical research and the conservation of currently endangered species.” This quote is very importante because it is very true because by this it shows that rather than docters focusing on bringing back animals they should just focuse on people and sickness or dieseses that are happening

Show More
Related
650 Words | 3 Pages

Over the past few years, a rise in concern for endangered species has emerged. There have been many animals that were mistreated by humans who wanted them as pets. Problems of potential extinction, unsatisfactory living conditions, hunting, and trading in the market have put special species of animals in danger. Many people have started to wonder if some species will still be alive in a few years. If this problem continues to heighten, it will not look good for some populations of endangered animals.

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

Science has said 99% of all species that existed have become extinct. That's "A LOT" of animals and organisms many of us have never seen before. If every life is precious shouldn't we be doing everything in our power to promote life and help all the endangered species stay in existent? 2. Explain your personal reaction to the book.

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

Woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius) have been extinct for a very long time, with the last of the species dying out about 3,600 years ago. But researchers say it may be possible to bring these and other extinct species back from the grave. There is significant controversy and critics over the idea of bring back to life and assert that efforts would be better spent conserving existing or endangered species. Critics of resurrection say reviving extinct animal could do more harm to conservation efforts than good. As for me, I would be disagreeing with the idea proposed.

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

War is organized murder and nothing else (Harry Patch).There are multiple reasons World War 1 started. It started because of imperialism,nationalism,militarism, and Alliances. There are two that I think are more important out of the four. The main underlying causes of World War 1 were nationalism and imperialism. Nationalism is the belief that your country is better than others.

Read More
195 Words | 1 Pages

Title- Citizen, Reintroduction of experimental populations of wolves I am a citizen who wants to have a say in public land and wants to have the right to have the wolves be apart of the landscape. The scenario I had choose is Reintroduction of experimental populations of wolves. Why I had picked this scenario is because they think there is some pros to having a say in the wolves being on the land or not. They think they should have a say because if a owner thinks a wolf is coming to strong or is harmful then they could just end that wolf. If the wolf was on the owner's property they should have a say if they get killed or not.

Read More
1101 Words | 5 Pages

She also states that animal research is “necessary to improve our understanding of disease”, “it is a privilege that must be carried out humanely”,

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Improving what we currently are trying to save such as extinction can comply with our community to help form a strong bond between themselves and animals. Have we stopped fighting for the loss of these animals? The answer is no. Continuing, humanity has gathered for many possible solutions to conserve what many find to be saving our

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

The Endangered Species Act, frequently referred to as the “pit-bull” of environmental law, has been a catalyst for conflict since its enactment in 1973. Endangered and threatened species, such as the Northern Spotted Owl and the Preble Meadow Jumping Mouse, have historically caused a great deal of conflict between the government and large developers. However, little attention has been given to the ongoing conflicts between smaller, private landowners and the government, resulting from the regulatory and financial burdens placed on these landowners by the Endangered Species Act. For many years, policymakers and researchers were primarily concerned with regional disputes with housing developers, giving little credence to the smaller, more numerous fights going on across the country.

Read More
377 Words | 2 Pages

The Endangered Species Act was passed into law on December 28, 1973, the act was designed to conserve and save threatened plants, animals, and their habitats. The Endangered Species Act is widely supported, and around 87% of Americans agree that the act is a successful way to keep endangered and threatened animals safe. The act has numerous positive effects on plant, and animal life, these positive effects are saving endangered and threatened species, preserving their ecosystem, and protecting plants and animals that assist in treating diseases. According to the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, 99% of species ever listed on the endangerment list remain on the planet today. The Bald Eagle is one of the many species saved by the Endangered Species

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

For example, science says that they can’t get enough DNA from dinosaurs to be able to bring them back because they only have fossils. Wooly mammoths may be easier because their bodies have been frozen in ice making it easier to take the DNA and put it in elephants. This process can bring animals back that can affect our ecosystems in a very big way. They can also alter the ways of life in those ecosystems. But it could also repopulate areas that low in numbers, a very good thing.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

One reason that de-extinction is a horrible idea is that the species, lets say a wooly mammoth, could potentially take important resources away from other species causing them to disappear. In the article The

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

Although the animals had to suffer, they brought scientist one step closer to finding a better, more efficient cure and solution to the

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

As stated in “Do elephants belong in zoos?”, zoos not only fund research on wild animals but also contribute to reducing the conflicts between them and people, for example, by planting crops that frighten elephants away and exploring the cases of poaching that could affect their mortality (Cohn 717). Moreover, most of the scientific matter on elephants such as facts about their communications, reproductive physiology and behavior were originally gathered on the ground of captive animals (Cohn 717). In his article, Borrell expresses the same opinion. He states that zoos serve as “a living museum” that help scientists to find necessary information on species for the research, and these facts can be used to prevent the extinction of the animals living in the wild (Borrell 9). Besides, zoos are crucial for raising money for conservation programs by giving people firsthand wildlife experience that increases interest in wild animals (Borrell 9).

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Wildlife Conservation is often seen as a bad thing, but if you look at it from my perspective, then it is actually a good thing. People think of it as holding wild animals captive, but we are actually protecting them from poachers. The purpose of Wildlife Conservation is to protect the animals in danger, which I am in agreement 110%. Other people argue that we shouldn’t have conservations, but they don’t know the harm that can happen to unprotected animals.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Zoos have been around since the eighteenth century. A zoo is defined as a compound where wild animals are kept for viewing and studying. The purpose of a zoo is mainly for education and protection, preserving animal species that are either at a risk of becoming extinct or for increased collection size (Jamieson). Animals from around the world have been enclosed in an area where we can admire and study these fine creatures. However, many modern zoos around the world have introduced animal shows, petting and feeding sessions to attract more visitors in order to earn more money.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Bringing Back Extinct Animals

Related Topics

Open Document