Pros And Cons Of The Fairness Of Standardized Testing Act

1399 Words6 Pages

As a direct result of public mistrust and a concern about the fairness of standardize testing, a bill was introduced known as H.R.4949 “Educational Testing Act of 1979”. This legislation was put forth and went into effect in both California and New York. The bill was introduced by Rep.Ted Weiss (D-NY), with the support of Rep.Shirley Chisholm (D-NY) and Rep.George Miller (D-CA). According to Wicklund (1980) the bill was created to address the fairness of college and university admission test by: refining the responsibility of the test manufacturers; to create less biased assessments and allow access by the public and expert researchers; to decrease the benefits of prep schools by having previous test open to the general public; to improve the …show more content…

Opponents of H.R. 4949 bill claimed that standardize test were fair and valid predictor of postsecondary success, especially during the first year of college for all students. They argued that the differences that persistently created a gap in scores was due mainly because of disparities in American culture and could not be attributed to biased test. They also believed that this would create unfair advantages for students with the socioeconomic means to seek educational alternative measures which would further increase the difference in test scores amongst the minority and majority. New criteria would have to be relied upon in order for admission officers to determine who was accepted and who was rejected. Critics also stressed the fact that test cost would essentially increase, and would limit the availability of …show more content…

Standardize test are not flawless instruments for precisely pinpointing what level of prior knowledge and learning a student has acquired without first considering other elements that may or may not be connected to what was cultivated. Information on admission test should correlate with educational experiences acquired from school and home; however, that is not always the case considering: (1) socioeconomic background ;( 2) overall mental and physical health ;( 3) sampling variability from other assessments; (4) unidentified error variance; and (5) motivation and drive. These are just some of the essential components require in order to proclaim the SAT and other forms of assessments as sole heir to the thrown of admissions in terms of validity, reliability and