Recommended: Causation of obesity essay
In the article “The Fat Tax,” Jonathan Rauch ironically discusses the new public policy concern with obesity. Although the article is a satire, it’s economic analysis is actually valid. In order to get his point across, Rauch uses sarcasm, appeals to logos, and degrades the issue of obesity to help Americans better understand the “big picture.” Moreover, if the diet of American consumers does not change then maybe advertising more exercise to lose weight will cut down the obesity rate; but to be just as effective, enacting the fat tax will improve health as well.
As the New York Mayor Michal Bloomberg is taking action against a soft drink industry. Mayor says that a ban is imposed on it because it has a big sugary drink. The mayor behavior could be considered biased towards specific company or product. There are lots of other, he should not ignore others. Everyone knows that lots of sugar are becoming the cause of problems in people like we drink almost daily like Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and other major soft drinks.
. That it was cleared by the F.D.A in 1974 and then put it on hold in 1981, 1983. He stated that if you drink diet cokes such as: Diet coke, coke zero, and Dr. Pepper Zero you ingest 32 times the amount that the FDA recommends. And that there is Aspartame in Soft Drinks, Yoghurt, Chewing Gum, Cooking Sauce, Crisps, Tabletop Sweeteners, and drink powders. Ben delivered his speech confidently and clearly a little better than Ethan did, because he was able to make me see his stand on the topic.
In his article Are You Responsible For Your Own Weight?, policy analyst Radley Balko argues that the Government has no business interfering with what individuals eat. Kelly Brownell, a Yale Chairman, and Marion Nestle a New York University professor state otherwise by arguing that the Government should intervene to create conditions that lead to healthy eating. Balko has a strong argument led with in depth examples, logical support, and credentials to support his tone along with minor fallacies. Kelly Brownell and Marion Nestle fail to go more in depth about her argument, but rely heavily on trying to counter the claims given by the opposing side. The lack of rhetorical devices in her article and inadequate organization weakens her tone as well as the appeal to their audience.
Court-Packing Plan Predicament War Throughout the years, mankind has helped its people to the best of its ability; however, the things that people do for others are not necessary the right choice for everyone involved. After the fall of the “Roaring Twenties,” the Great Depression came forward bringing troubles for America economically, politically, and socially. After President Herbert Hoover left office, the American people developed a sense of hope as President Franklin Delano Roosevelt embarked on coming up with programs that would help America; This plan was named “FDR’s New Deal which brought about a new era: The New Deal Era. After having some articles fail to pass, President Roosevelt had a plan for the Supreme Court that soon had effects of distraught and anger on the American people. This was known as the Court-Packing Plan incident.
¨Several critics questioned why the city was making proposal on sugary drinks a priority when some city schoolchildren have no physical education classes.¨ (Washington TImes) In New York, Mayor Bloomberg placed a law on the sizes of soda citizens are allowed to get. However, this caused a lot of controversy on whether the ban was good or bad. Despite the amount of people supporting the ban´s choice, the ban does have some downsides on it. It is not a good idea to limit the amount of a soda a person can purchase (or propose the ban) because it's not applying to all, it's taking rights away from people, and itś not a big deal.
The soda ban is a defective idea in itself because of the loopholes in the plan. As Karin Klien talks about the problem in her article “Sodas a Problem but…”, “Convenience stores such as 7-Eleven are overseen by State and would be exempt , but a Burger King across the street would be restricted” (Klien, 288). In addition, there isn’t a need for this soda ban because it makes no sense for a customer at a fast food restaurant (like Subway) to walk across the street and go to a 7-eleven, which is a state-ran store that has drinks that are over 16oz., and even over 64oz. People could even go to a grocery store and buy a 2-liter bottle of the sugary drink because it isn’t run by the city. Another way the soda ban contradicts itself is because of how you’d get the same amount of sugar if you were to drink a drink from a smoothie
Sara E Benjamin, Angie Cradock, Elizabeth M Walker, Meghan Slining and Matthew W Gillman purpose is to provide insight on regulations concerning childhood obesity in child care centers. They touch on the increase of childhood obesity and the resulting health problems arising because of it. They emphasize that although genetic factors are relevant, it's the increase in consumption of sweetened beverages that is at great fault for childhood obesity. Other factors that play an important role in the increase of childhood obesity is offering food as a reward. As well as television and screen time, mostly because there is a shown decrease of physical activity resulting from it.
Over the years more and more Americans have become victims to obesity. As our foods are being packed with salt and fat, our plates are growing bigger and bigger. Fast foods have contributed to obesity for decades. According to ABC News, over the past twenty years soft drinks have increased by 52 percent. Americans have always believed bigger was better so fast food chains have always competed on who gave more food for the better deal.
In conclusion, America should not ban sodas because it would just backfire in their faces just like prohibition did, but should help one another at the very least look at alternatives to help get a better and healthier life instead of trying to do it by
There are moments in which some choose to enjoy a succulent candy bar and a refreshing soda, while others choose to eat a fresh cut salad and drink freshly squeezed lemonade. While both of those choices may sound acceptable to each individual, the government does not think so. They believe that there should be less sugary, unhealthy food and more fresh foods available to the consumer. The government should have no control over the food its citizens eat nor should they be able to control the choices that are provided. The government should have no control over the food or food choices that are provided because that limits personal choice.
If changes are not made now, then people will soon be living shorter lives and suffer most of their life from obesity and the health issues that come with it. The Government should regulate what Americans consume in order to curb obesity rates and potentially save lives. Childhood obesity is a big issue that affects children every day. A third of the child population below the age of 20 are considered obese. The way Americans eat today and the lack of physical activity is leading to serious health risk that will continue to get worse as children age.
Each year, billions of gallons of soda are sold in the United States alone.” Soda must be allowed to middle schoolers during school hours. Soda should be allowed because kids need more of a choice at school and soda is not the cause of all the bad stuff. Soda must be allowed at middle school because kids need more of a choice at school. At many schools the only things to drink are milk, water, and a few other juices you have to pay extra for.
However, people’s action to sue fast food companies seems hardly sensible, because their foods are not poisoned, spoilt, or molded. Although their foods are far from healthy and their advertising tactics are extremely cunning, fast food restaurants are not the only one to blame for today’s rocketing rates of obesity-related health problems. It is entirely a person’s decision whether or not he or she chooses to eat fast foods. It is largely known that fast foods are junks for the body, yet people still buy them wanting a quick fix for their rumbling stomach. People can always avoid fast foods and make healthier options if they want to, and suing the fast food restaurants will not make them lose any weight or fat they have in their body.
That is why many propose regulating the purchases of carbonated drinks pact with sugar, or more commonly known as soda. One can of soda contains about 2.5 tablespoons of sugar, and on average, 9% of the daily calories consumed per person is from soda. Due to the high numbers of obesity in America, soda’s and other drinks high in sugar, should be regulated. Obesity can lead to many health problems. Some issues that can potentially occur because of what the person is eating include diabetes, high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, body pains, and potential death (in fact, one article in The New York Times claimed sugar, more particularly soda, to “might just be the biggest killers via preventable disease in the country”
