ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Right To Bear Arms

618 Words3 Pages

There are a lot of debates about gun rights. Most people agree that the people should have gun rights. The government is trying to take the right from the people. There will always be the right to bear arms. The gun rights should be legalized, because the 2nd amendment states that the people have the rights, it also protects the people of any harm, it also helps the people to hunt and gather food. The U.S constitution protects the people to the right to keep and bear arms. The right to bear arms was passed in December 15, 1789 (Lund, Winkler, 1). The 2nd amendment protects the people from harm. Some of the people do not use guns the right way. The military uses gun force to protect the people from other countries. The 2nd amendment is based on the right to keep and bear arms in the common-law. It was influenced by the bill of rights in 1689 (Lund, Winkler, 1). The people should have the right to keep and carry a gun. The people should respect the law and do the right thing with guns. The government is in the right by having people get a permit to have and carry a gun. …show more content…

It lets the military and other branches of the government protect the U.S from the other countries. The government protects the people using the force of guns and weapons. They protect the U.S overseas, on the ground and air. There are many types of the government that protects the people. The right to bear arms lets home and business owners protect their property. If there weren’t any gun rights the people wouldn’t be able to protect their property. The grocery store and every other store wouldn’t be able to be in business. The people of the U.S would be stealing everything from every store. The local business owners would be helpless to protect their

Show More
Related
591 Words | 3 Pages

The Second amendment is one that allows all americans to carry guns. Because of the school shootings and other massacres people are saying that they want to have gun restrictions. The way that they are wanting to just act like everything will be ok when they ban guns is almost a denile. Even if they make guns completely illegal people who have the desire to kill someone will still be able to do so if they wish. The gun bans are only occurring in the states not across the

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

In the Bill of Rights I am using the Second Amendment because that is the right to bear arms. This relates because back when this amendment was passed the Government realized that people need arms to protect themselves and to hunt. Know we are fighting to keep these arms just like how the colonies had to fight to get this amendment passed. This amendment was passed so that people could protect themselves from harm and danger. This amendment should not be tampered with because people need these guns for uses that benefit us.

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

amendment is also not granted by the US constitution. To many people, the second amendment is not clear. It confuses a lot in that some people argue that those that have the rights to possess firearms for self-defense are only the military. It does not specify that the citizens have the right to own firearms for self-defense and personal use. A study conducted by a Yale Professor showed that the “shall-issue” laws resulted in a rise in the rates of the violence, crimes, rape, and robbery hence with this it could be concluded that ownership of firearms by citizens lead to an increase in the crime rates.

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

The right to bear arms gave us the power to bear arms to protect our constitution. Many civilizations like the British did not allow their civilians to bear arms giving them absolute power. The writers of the constitution wanted the citizens to be able to protect their rights. It also states that we have the right to a Militia, which to date is our national guard. When you get into politics and maybe ask someone about the second amendment two things will pop up, the individual right, or the right to a militia.

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Us americans don't need to “bear arms.” Some may say that many people use them to hunt but there are many other weapons you can use to hunt with as well as protecting yourself from danger. By having the second amendment, it gives criminals the right to go out and harm people, whether it be a family member, friend, someone you walk past. Statistics say that “The U.S. has an estimated 283 million guns in civilian hands.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights is the right to bear arms, which gives American citizens a constitutional right to own and purchase guns. It states, "A well-regulated

Read More
95 Words | 1 Pages

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the individual to keep and bear firearms. When the Second Amendment was written it was for the right to arm oneself as a personal liberty to deter undemocratic or oppressive governing bodies from forming and to repel impending invasions. Furthermore, gun advocates proclaim that guns are for the right to self-defense. Some people try to participate and uphold the law. We have seen how guns in the hands of children can cause fatal accidents and people have committed mindless crimes leading to

Read More
285 Words | 2 Pages

The second amendment states that people have a right to bear arms under a well-regulated militia. This amendment was added to the Bill of Rights because the Americans had just finished fighting The American Revolution with the British government for independence-- Gun control by the British was one of the catalysts of this war. With the revolution fresh in mind, the Americans had registered that there was a need to unite and form a union; however, some Americans felt that a union could result in something similar to the tyranny that the British had imposed on them. They were hesitant of placing the power on a small handful of people-- The second amendment helped take some power from the government and give it to the people.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

The Second Amendment protects the right of people to keep and bear arms. This amendment was a controversial among different people in the government. It was between letting the people keep their weapons or to not let the people keep their weapons. This amendment was important to the framers of the Constitution because it provided the country with a well-regulated militia. The Second Amendment states "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

As long as guns have been around people have debated on whether guns should be legal or not. This debate has been floating around since the Second Amendment. The government can't get a grip on this debate to make a decision. One reasoning that guns should not be illegal is that guns are needed for protection at some points in time. People with permits are usually not the ones that commit the crime.

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

Openly carrying guns can harm other people's freedom. This being said, second amendment has more meaning to it than what it simplys stated in constitution. Founding fathers include this freedom Back in 1700s because they want it to protect their-self from europeans. .

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

The second amendment is needed in the society that we live in today. It would cause a lot of trouble if people tried to amend the second amendment. I understand that the trajectory for the right to bear arm is becoming narrow and people are starting to see an issue with it. But, I believe that there are different things that can be enforced that will prevent some of these issues. Thomas Jefferson stated, “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution’s Second Amendment states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " This means that all law abiding citizens have the right to own guns if they want to. But, there are people trying to take this right away from us through gun control legislation, which is wrong. All law abiding citizens should have the right to own guns. Self defense is probably the number one most important reason that law abiding citizens should have the choice to own guns.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Right To Bear Arms

Related Topics

Open Document