ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Roman Republic

1083 Words5 Pages

Introduction
The Roman Republic was a good empire for a long period of time. They said they would never be ruled by someone again, SPQR. After a while, they got ruled again by emperors, but did they ever meet the common good? The Roman Republic somewhat meet the common good due to providing public services, preparing for a common defense, promote rule of law and protecting rights.

Providing public services Grade: B-
When It came to providing public services the Roman Republic earned a B-. The reason it earned a B- was because of the aqueducts, roads, and gladiators fights. The aqueducts was a plus on the Roman side, it brought water from mountain springs to the fountains and baths in close by cites. One aqueduct was 50 miles long from the source in the mountains, to the city of Carthage. At the same time, this was not good …show more content…

They earned a C+ because of how they determined and handled punishments. Romans overtime created a legal system with judges, lawyers, and courts. The punishment decision made by judges was based on individual rights, common sense, and fairness. Poor people got much harsher punishments than the rich citizens. If a wealthy roman hasn’t paid their taxes or debts they would be often fined as their punishment. What if they couldn’t pay that fine? Well, they would lose their citizenship and property. Sometimes even forbidden to come home. On the other hand, most poor people were sent to fight as gladiators, sold into slavery, or forced to work underground in mines. That 's not all, the punishments get more brutal. A large quantity of criminals got put to death on a cross, beheaded, or torn apart by beasts! To try and dissuade people from breaking the law, they severely punished people who committed crimes. One thing Rome could have done better is to not have had such brutal punishments that mostly always end up killing

Show More
Related
544 Words | 3 Pages

According to the background essay “ … a Roman citizen was judged more by how he behaves with his family, his neighbors, and his property.” This means that instead of doing work and manual labour to become a citizen, you simply had to respect and honor each other and their space. However, this thought can be countered by saying that instead of simply respecting one’s space, you should have to endure military training, and prove that you respect your country. But, if you have a disability, or are unable to serve, that would mean that you can’t become a citizen. Therefore, Rome had a better government system.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

This was a bad decision because it caused inflation. Another economic reason why the Roman Republic failed was because of taxes. The poor made up a large percentage of the Roman population. The government became oppressive and started to force everything on the people. Roman leaders came up with the forced labor which made peasants work on fields, roads, and bridges.

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

Rome had the better outlook by far focusing mostly on family like it says in the paragraph “ A Roman citizen was judged more by how he behaved with his family, his neighbors, and his property”. This overall created a better environment with happier more helpful people which was better. Rome did have some of the Athenian rules just not the harsh ones the more diplomatic ones that were good for the system, because each system really does need some rules at least. Rome treated their citizens better too it seemed especially since it was a place where they showed citizenship through better treatment to each other. Roman morals earned people these vital roles as a senate overall

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

2a. The Romans' considerable generosity in granting citizenship was one reason why their system was superior to Athens. 2b. Document A shows how the Roman Republic, unlike Athens, was fairly generous in granting citizenship and the different requirements the nation had for being a citizen. For example, it shows that in Rome, anyone but slaves who fit the requirements could be citizens, while in Athens, no one but free, native-born adult males were granted citizenship.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Rome was a very powerful empire, but eventually fell because of one thing, weak political leadership. Weak political leadership was the main reason why Rome fell and it was more of a chain because when there is bad leadership then there is bad military and more invaders. The invasions got more effective and hurt the empire a lot more than it should have at that time. First of all Rome went from a republic to a empire with all the power and rights from the people slowly slipping away to the all powerful emperors at the end. Emperors did not want to share any power with the people which was very bad because they only paid attention to power, for example how Julius Caesar get kill/assassinated on March 15, 44 BCE in Rome, Italy.

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

The Roman Empire and Roman Republic were two distinct periods in the history of ancient Rome. The Roman Republic was established in 509 BC, following the overthrow of the Etruscan monarchy. It lasted until 27 BC when the Roman Empire was established under the rule of Augustus. One of the main differences between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was their form of government. The Roman Republic was a system of government where elected officials represented the people.

Read More
1445 Words | 6 Pages

Rome Impact On Today's U.S. There are many reasons on why Rome or Greece is better than the other in the categories of math, technology and even the military, But that's not the point I’m trying to get across I'm writing about how much of an impact these countries have made in modern day, here are my reasons why Rome has overcome that aspect. I think that the country of Rome has made a bigger impact on the U.S. today because of their military, leaders and also their technology was also more advanced than other countries. There are many reasons why Rome has made more of an impact on the US today ,the first reason would be because of their more advanced military, how well their leaders led their army and military during that time of war , that

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

Within itself, it consisted of 60-80 million people. Rome had a better system than Athens because of their process of citizenship, their citizens’ contributions society, and amazing government system. Unlike Athens, the Roman Republic granted citizenship for all free native-born adults and children. Document A shows us that Athens only accepted free, native-born adult males as citizens. Some may argue that they were more protective,

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

I strongly believe this because without their philosophy, law, and citizenship were would we be today? Everyone would agree that Roman philosophy has greatly affected modern day philosophy. In ancient Rome, the most important philosophy was Stoicism. The people believed that if you were Stoic, you were believed to have "toughness" and you didn't show any emotions. Darwin's Theory of

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

“Why did the Roman Republic fall?” The Roman Republic did not fall simply from one cause, rather many external pressures that brought on political instability and destruction. There were multiple pressures that lead to the downfall of Rome including ambitious generals, changing politics, client armies, and a desolate Senate desperate to remain prominent. Many significant people of the time, who wrote letters and speeches on ancient Rome, help to build detailed recollections of the political warfare that took place between 78-31BC.

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

No Roman citizens could be sentenced to die on the cross. Roman women could not engage in any important business decisions without the agreement of their parents, husbands, or guardians. Any Roman citizen had an absolute power over their slaves; and no Roman citizen could legally be held as slaves. According to the book The Romans- From Village to

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

In Ancient Rome, the Romans had their own Roman Republic. The Roman republic reasonably met the common good. The way they did this was that they didn’t fully meet the common good in all areas, but in other areas they did. In public service I would give the Ancient Romans an A. One of the greatest achievements in ancient time was the waterway.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Roman Republic

Related Topics

Open Document