Pros And Cons Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

706 Words3 Pages

Methods and Violations of the Stanford Prison Experiment

Oliva Jarvis

University of Phoenix

Oliva Jarvis

University of Phoenix

Psych/599: Foundations of Graduate Study in Psychology

Judith Sugg

Monday July 10th, 2023

Methods and violations of the Stanford prison experiment

The Stanford prison experiment showed, in an intriguing way, how quickly people may be swayed by their surroundings when assigned particular tasks. The experiment's most significant effects were on psychology research methodologies and how to safeguard participants in studies involving both human and animal subjects as well as the researchers themselves in the event of violations of the American Psychological Association ethical guidelines.

Stanford Experiment

In 1971 Dr. Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment with the focus to understand human behavior in a particular setting, in this case prison, Mcray (2015). The study’s goal was to figure out how the behavior was affected by the role-playing, labeling, and social expectations over the course of two weeks, (Zimbardo, 2004). The experiment ended just after six days into the experiment due to frightening elevated levels of abuse (Zimbardo, 2004).

Human Behavior

The experiment revealed that human behavior can be influenced by the environment and situations they are in. …show more content…

In the process, the participants were interviewed and tested for personality traits as well. As a result, anyone who had criminal records or abusing narcotics likewise anyone who displayed personality disorders and physical disorders or psychological problems was excluded from the study, (Zimbardo, 20004). At the end, only white middle class males and one Asian American male were selected to participate in the study. Resulting on minimal diversity included in the